Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T00:10:34.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Theories of evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

John D. Greenwood
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Theories of evolution dominated intellectual debate in Europe and America in the latter half of the nineteenth century, especially after the publication of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859). Although religious authorities resisted, natural scientists and the educated public generally embraced theories of evolution. Such theories often represented human progress – or, at least, white, male, and Western human progress – as a triumph of the “survival of the fittest.”

Early Greek thinkers such as Empedocles had advanced theories of the evolution of biological species. However, most scholars during the medieval period had accepted the Aristotelian account of an immutable and hierarchical natural order, or scala naturae. Such an account not only sustained the popular conception of a purposive natural order created by a benevolent God, but also conveniently supported the notion of an immutable social hierarchy governed by kings, bishops, and the aristocracy. This account was generally accepted until the late eighteenth century and – by a good many theorists – beyond. For example, Gall's phrenology presupposed a more or less fixed hierarchy of neurological function (Young, 1990).

Nineteenth-century evolutionary theorists abandoned the notion of an immutable “great chain of being” (Lovejoy, 1936) and developed explanations of the accepted fact of species change. They generally represented evolution as a process of progressive development toward a hierarchical natural order. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744–1829) and Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) advanced theories that replaced the extrinsic teleology of a divinely created natural order with the intrinsic teleology of progressive development toward a natural order. Charles Darwin (1809–1882) was the exception. His rigorously materialist theory of evolution by natural selection treated evolution as a purely mechanistic process with no extrinsic or intrinsic purpose.

Early evolutionary theories

Theories of organic evolution began to resurface in the late eighteenth century (earlier anticipations are to be found in Leibniz and Kant). The English physician Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802), the grandfather of Charles Darwin, advanced a theory of the evolution of animal traits in Zoonomia (1794–1796), later popularized in his poem The Temple of Nature (1803). His theory was an extension of Hartley's associationist psychology. Darwin generalized traditional empiricist explanations of the development of individual psychology to the evolutionary development of species by claiming that learned associations and habits engender modifications of the nervous system that are passed on to future generations of a species.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Conceptual History of Psychology
Exploring the Tangled Web
, pp. 185 - 235
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, S. (1959). Darwin's illness. Nature, 184, 1102–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angell, J. R. (1909). The influence of Darwin on psychology. Psychological Review, 16, 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1902). Development and Evolution. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bannister, R. C. (1979). Social Darwinism: Science and Myth in Anglo-American Thought. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bibby, C. (1959). T. H. Huxley: Scientist, Humanist and Educator. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Birke, L. (1986). Women, Feminism, and Biology. New York, NY: Methuen.Google Scholar
Boakes, R. (1984). From Darwin to Behaviorism: Psychology and the Minds of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolles, R. C. (1993). The Story of Psychology: A Thematic History. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J. (1975). The changing meaning of evolution. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36, 106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, P. J. (1983). The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J. (1989). The Mendelian Revolution: The Emergence of Hereditarian Concepts in Modern Science and Society. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1894). Some remarks on punishment. International Journal of Ethics, 4, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Chalmers, R. (1844). Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Clark, R. W. (1986). The Survival of Charles Darwin. New York, NY: Avon.Google Scholar
Colp, R. Jr. (1977). To Be an Invalid: The Illness of Charles Darwin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (1993). How Lloyd Morgan's canon backfired. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 29, 113–122.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1839). Journal of Researches into the Geology and Natural History of the Various Countries Visited by H.M.S. Beagle. London: Colburn.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1877). Biographical sketch of an infant. Mind, 2, 258–294.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1896). Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. (Vols. 1–2.) New York, NY: Appleton. (Original work published 1868.)Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1958). The Autobiography of Charles Darwin and Selected Letters. (Darwin, F., Ed.) New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1892.)Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1998). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1872.)Google Scholar
Darwin, E. (1794–1796). Zoonomia: Or, the Laws of Organic Life. (Vols. 1–2.) London: Johnson.Google Scholar
Darwin, E. (1803). The Temple of Nature. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Darwin, L. (1928). What is Eugenics?London: Murray.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (1911). Eugenics: The Science of Human Improvement by Better Breeding. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1978). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1917). The need for social psychology. Psychological Review, 24, 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary Genius. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1872). Gregariousness in cattle and men. Macmillan's Magazine, 23, 357.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1874). English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1888). Co-relations and their measurement: chiefly from anthropometric data. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 45, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1889). Natural Inheritance. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1901). The possible improvement of the human breed under the existing conditions of law and sentiment. Nature, 64, 659–665.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1980). Ever Since Darwin. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gray, P. H. (1968). Prerequisite to an analysis of behaviorism: the conscious automaton theory from Spalding to William James. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 4, 365–376.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (1976). The Question of Animal Awareness: Evolutionary Continuity of Mental Experience. New York, NY: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. W. (1969). Who was the Beagle's naturalist?British Journal of the History of Science, 4, 266–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. (1876). The History of Creation. (Vols. 1–2.) New York, NY: Appleton.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. (1883). The Pedigree of Man and other Essays. London: Freethought.Google Scholar
Hale, M. (1980). Human Science and Order: Hugo Münsterberg and the Origins of Applied Psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, M. (1997). Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haycraft, J. B. (1895). Darwinism and Race Progress. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, L. S. (1987). The Shaping of Modern Psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hergenhahn, B. R. (1997). An Introduction to the History of Psychology. (edn.) Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, G. (1984). The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, R. (1955). Social Darwinism in American Thought. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, L. S. (1914). Functional periodicity. In Contributions to Education, No. 69. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, L. S. (1940). Public Addresses. Lancaster, PA: Science Press.Google Scholar
Hothersall, D. (1995). History of Psychology. (edn.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hutton, R. H. (1894). Charles Darwin. In Hutton, R. H. (Ed.), Criticisms of Contemporary Thought and Thinkers: Selected Papers from the Spectator. (Vol. 2.) London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1882.)Google Scholar
Huxley, T. (1863). Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. (1931). Selected Writings of Hughlings Jackson. (Taylor, J., Ed.) (Vols. 1–2.) London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
Jenkin, F. (1867). The origin of species. North British Review, 46, 277–318.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J-B. (1809). Philosophie Zoologique. (Eliot, H., Trans.) London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lankester, E. R. (1880) Degeneration: A Chapter in Darwinism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahey, T. H. (1992). A History of Psychology. (edn.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1859–60). The Physiology of Common Life. (Vols 1–2.) London: William Blackwood and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1935). Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vegels. Journal of Ornithology, 83, 137–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lowry, R. (1982). The Evolution of Psychological Theory: A Critical History of Concepts and Presuppositions. (edn.) New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. (1882). Ants, Bees and Wasps: A Record of Observations on the Habits of Social Hymenoptera. London: Kegan Paul, Trench.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. (1969). Principles of Geology, Being an Attempt to Explain the Former Changes of the Earth's Surface by Reference to Causes now in Operation. New York, NY: Johnson Reprint. (Original work published 1830–1838.)Google Scholar
Magner, L. S. (1994). A History of the Life Sciences. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. (1914). An Essay on the Principle of Population as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society. New York, NY: Dutton. (Original work published 1798.)Google Scholar
Marzluff, J. M. and Angell, T. (2005). In the Company of Crows and Ravens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mendel, G. (1866). Experiments in plant hybridization. Proceedings of the Natural History Society of Brno, 4, 3–47.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1979). An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy and of the Principal Philosophical Questions Discussed in his Writings. (Robson, J. M., Ed.) Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1865.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1985). The Subjection of Women. London: Dent. (Original work published 1869.)Google Scholar
Moore, J. R. (1985). Herbert Spencer's henchmen: the evolution of Protestant liberals in late-nineteenth-century America. In Durant, J. (Ed.), Darwinism and Divinity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1883). Suicide of scorpions. Nature, 27, 313–314.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1884). On instinct. Nature, 29, 370–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1890). Animal Life and Intelligence. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1896). Habit and Instinct. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1898). Review of Animal Intelligence by E. L. Thorndike. Nature, 58, 249–250.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1900). Animal Behavior. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1903). Introduction to Comparative Psychology. (edn.) London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. (1977). Introduction to comparative psychology. In Robinson, D. N. (Ed.), Significant Contributions to the History of Psychology, 1750–1920. Series D: Comparative Psychology. (Vol. 2.) Washington, DC: University Publications of America. (Original work published 1894.)Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1901). National Life from the Standpoint of Science. London: Black.Google Scholar
Quetelet, L. A. (1969). A Treatise on Man and the Development of his Faculties. A Reproduction of the English Translation of 1842. Gainesville, FL: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints. (Original work published 1835.)Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1997). From Soul to Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. (1987). Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1884a). Mental Evolution in Animals. New York, NY: Appleton.Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1884b). Mr. Lloyd Morgan on instinct. Nature, 29, 379–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1885). Mental Evolution in Man. New York, NY: Appleton.Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1977). Animal intelligence. In Robinson, D. N. (Ed.), Significant Contributions to the History of Psychology, 1750–1920. Series A: Orientations. (Vol. 7.) Washington, DC: University Publications of America. (Original work published 1882.)Google Scholar
Secord, J. A. (2001). Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shields, S. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: a study in social myth. American Psychologist, 30, 739–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, D. (1976). Two concepts of adaptation: Darwin's and psychology's. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 12, 367–375.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soloway, R. (1990). Demography and Degeneration. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Spalding, D. A. (1872). On instinct. Nature, 6, 485–486.Google Scholar
Spalding, D. A. (1873). Instinct. With original observations on young animals. Macmillan's Magazine, 27, 282–293.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1851). Social Statics, or, the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness. London: John Chapman.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1855). Principles of Psychology. London: Longmans.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, H. (1862). First Principles. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1864–1867). The Principles of Biology. (Vols. 1–2.) London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1870). Principles of Psychology. (edn.) London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1873). The Study of Sociology. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1876). The Principles of Sociology. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1892). Principles of Ethics. (Vols. 1–2). London: Williams and Northgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1893). The Inadequacy of Natural Selection. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1908). The Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer. (Duncan, D., Ed.) London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. Jr. (1962). Lamarckianism in American social science. Journal of the History of Ideas, 23, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocking, G. W. Jr. (1968). Race, Culture and Evolution. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. B. (1903). The Mental Traits of Sex. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. B. (1911). Animal Intelligence. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Viney, W. and King, D. B. (1998). A History of Psychology: Ideas and Context. (edn.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1858). On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. Proceedings of the Linnean Society, 3, 53–63.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1864). The origin of human races and the antiquity of man deduced from “the theory of natural selection.”Anthropological Review, 2, 158–187.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1869). Geological climates and the origin of species. Quarterly Review, 126, 359–394.Google Scholar
Warren, H. C. (1918). Mechanism vs. vitalism in the domain of psychology. Philosophical Review, 27, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, H. C. (1925). Mechanism and teleology in psychology. Psychological Review, 32, 266–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissman, A. (1893a). The Germ Plasm: A Theory of Heredity. New York, NY: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Weissman, A. (1893b). The all-sufficiency of natural selection. Contemporary Review, 64, 309–338, 596–610.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Woolley, H. T. (1910). A review of recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wundt, W. (1894). Lectures on Human and Animal Psychology. (Crighton, J. E. and Titchener, E. B., Trans.) New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1863.)Google Scholar
Young, R. M. (1990). Mind, Brain and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Theories of evolution
  • John D. Greenwood, City University of New York
  • Book: A Conceptual History of Psychology
  • Online publication: 05 September 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107414914.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Theories of evolution
  • John D. Greenwood, City University of New York
  • Book: A Conceptual History of Psychology
  • Online publication: 05 September 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107414914.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Theories of evolution
  • John D. Greenwood, City University of New York
  • Book: A Conceptual History of Psychology
  • Online publication: 05 September 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107414914.008
Available formats
×