Allen, William, Beal, Joan. C., Corrigan, Karen P., Maguire, Warren, and Moisl, Hermann 2007. ‘A linguistic “time-capsule”: The Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English’, in Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P., and Moisl, Hermann (eds.), Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, volume 2: Diachronic Databases. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 16–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amand, Maelle 2014. ‘Revisiting the TLS sociophonetic analysis of Tyneside English’. Paper presented at the ALOES Workshop, Paris-Diderot.Google Scholar

Andersson, Lars and Peter, Trudgill 1990. Bad Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Barnfield, Kate and Buchstaller, Isabelle 2010. ‘Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends’. English World-Wide 31: 252–87.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie 2002. ‘Inferring variation and change from public corpora’, in Chambers, Jack K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 97–114.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. and Corrigan, Karen P. 2007. “Time and Tyne”: A corpus-based study of variation and change in relativisation strategies in Tyneside English’, in Elspass, Stephan, Langer, Nils, Scharloth, Joachim and Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.) Germanic Language Histories ‘from Below’ (1700–2000). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 99–114.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P., Rayson, Paul and Smith, Nicholas 2007. ‘Writing the Vernacular: Transcribing and tagging the Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (NECTE)’, in Meurman-Solin, , Anneli, and Arja Nurmi, (eds.) Annotating Variation and Change, volume 1. Available online from www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/01/beal_et_al/.Google Scholar

Bender, Emily M. and Good, Jeff 2010. ‘A grand challenge for linguistics: Scaling up and integrating models’. Paper contributed to the NSF’s SBE 2020 initiative. Available online from www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/submission_detail.cfm?upld_id=81.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny 1982. Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Karen P. 1997. The Syntax of South Armagh English in Its Socio-Historical Perspective, unpublished, PhD thesis, University College Dublin.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Karen 2009. ‘Irish daughters of Northern British relatives: Internal and external constraints on the system of relativization in South Armagh English’, in Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, and Paulasto, Heli (eds.) Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English and Beyond. London: Taylor and Francis/Routledge. pp. 133–62.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Karen 2010. Irish English, Volume 1: Northern Ireland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Karen 2011. ‘The “art of making the best use of bad data”: Mining the Irish National Folklore Collection for evidence of linguistic contact, variation and change’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.) Researching the Languages of Ireland. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet. pp. 183–205.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Karen P., Mearns, Adam, and Moisl, Hermann 2014. ‘Feature-based versus aggregate analyses of the DECTE corpus: Phonological and morphological variability in Tyneside English’, in Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Bernhard, Wälchli (eds.) Aggregating Dialectology, Typology and Register Analysis. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. pp. 113–49.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Karen P. and Mearns, Adam (eds.) 2016. Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Volume 3: Databases for Public Engagement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

D’Arcy, Alexandra 2011. ‘Corpora: Capturing language in use’, in Maguire, Warren and McMahon, April (eds.) Analysing Variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 49–71.Google Scholar

Farr, Fiona and Murphy, Bróna 2009. ‘Religious references in contemporary Irish English: “For the love of God almighty … I’m the holy terror for turf”’. Journal of Intercultural Pragmatics 6: 535–59.Google Scholar

Fehringer, Carol and Corrigan, Karen P. 2015. ‘The rise of the going to future in Tyneside English: Evidence for further grammaticalisation’. English World-Wide 36: 198-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glassie, Henry 1982. Passing the Time in Ballymenone: Folklore and History of an Ulster Community. Dublin: The O’Brien Press.Google Scholar

Harris, John 1985. Phonological Variation and Change: Studies in Hiberno-English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hasund, K. 1998. ‘Protecting the innocent: the issue of informants anonymity in the CLOT corpus’, in Renouf, Antoinette (ed.). Explorations in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 13–28.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Sebastian 2007. ‘From web-page to mega-corpus: The CNN transcripts’, in Hundt, Marianne, Nadja, Nesselhauf and Biewer, Carolin (eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 69–86.Google Scholar

Johnson, Dan E. 2009. ‘Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed effects variable rule analysis’. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 359–83.Google Scholar

Kendall, Tyler 2011. ‘Corpora from a sociolinguistic perspective’, in Gries, Stefan (ed.). ‘Corpus Studies: Future Directions’, Special Issue of Revista Brasiliera de Linguistíca Aplicada 11. pp. 361–89.Google Scholar

Kretzschmar, William. A., Anderson, Jean., Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P., Opas-Hänninen, Lisa Lena and Plichta, Bartek 2006. ‘Collaboration on corpora for regional and social analysis’. Journal of English Linguistics 34: 172–205.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1981. Field Methods Used by the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation. Texas: South Western Educational Developmental Laboratory.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1997. ‘Some further steps in narrative analysis’. Journal of Narrative and Life History: Special Issue - Oral Versions of Personal Experience 7: 395–415.Google Scholar

Labov, William 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Volume I Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William and Waletzky, Joshua 1967. ‘Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience’, in Helm, June (ed.) Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press. pp. 12–44.Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe 2013. ‘Using WinPitch as a multifile concordancer for the NECTE corpus’. Paper presented at Corpus Interoperability and Diachrony: The NECTE-DECTE Corpora, Paris-Diderot.Google Scholar

McEnery, Tony and Andrew, Hardie 2012. Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mearns, Adam, 2015. ‘Tyneside’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.) Researching Northern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehl, Seth, Wallis, Sean, and Aarts, Bas, 2016. ‘Language learning at your fingertips: Deploying corpora in mobile teaching apps’, in Corrigan, Karen P. and Mearns, Adam (eds.) Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Volume 3: Databases for Public Engagement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 211–240.Google Scholar

Meurman-Solin, Anneli and Nurmi, Arja (eds.) 2007. Annotating Variation and Change, Volume 1. Available online from www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/01/beal_et_al/.Google Scholar

Milroy, James and Harris, John 1980. ‘When is a merger not a merger?: the MEAT/MATE problem in present-day vernacular English’. English World-Wide 1: 199–210.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley and Gordon, Matthew 2003. Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hermann, Moisl and Maguire, Warren 2008. ‘Identifying the main determinants of phonetic variation in the Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English’. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 15: 46–69.Google Scholar

Murphy, K. 2012. ‘The Folklore of South Armagh’. Lecture presented on 18th March 2012, Newry and Mourne Museum.Google Scholar

Murphy, Michael J. 1973. Tyrone Folk Quest. Belfast: Blackstaff.Google Scholar

Murphy, Michael J. 1975. Now You’re Talking. Belfast: Blackstaff.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena 1996. ‘The corpus of early English correspondence’, in Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Language History. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Parisse, Christophe 2013. ‘Converting the NECTE files into CLAN readable format’. Paper at Corpus Interoperability and Diachrony: The NECTE-DECTE Corpora, Paris-Diderot.Google Scholar

Rock, Frances 2001. ‘Policy and practice in the anonymisation of linguistic data’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6: 1–26.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Smith, Eric 2005. ‘GoldVarb X’, Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/GoldVarb/GV_index.htm.Google Scholar

Sinclair, John 2005. ‘Corpus and Text - Basic Principles’ in Wynne, Martin (ed.) Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, Oxford: Oxbow Books. pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Slembrouck, Stef 1992. ‘The parliamentary Hansard “verbatim” report: the written construction of spoken discourse’. Language and Literature 1: 101–19.Google Scholar

Smith, Nick, Hoffman, Sebastian and Rayson, Paul 2008. ‘Corpus tools and methods, today and tomorrow: Incorporating linguists’ manual annotations’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 23: 163–80.Google Scholar

Smyth, Daragh 1997. ‘Murphy’s Lore’, Special issue of Artslink. Belfast: Northern Ireland Arts Council.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2004. ‘Comparative sociolinguistics’, in Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. pp. 729–63.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2006. Analyzing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2007. ‘Representing real language: Consistency, trade offs and thinking ahead!’, in Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P., and Moisl, Hermann (eds.) Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Volume 2: Diachronic Databases. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 205–40.Google Scholar

Widdowson, John D. A. 1999. ‘Hidden depths: Exploring archival resources of spoken English’. Lore and Language 17: 81–92.Google Scholar