Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T10:33:56.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Antidemocratic Potential of Party System Institutionalization: Malaysia as Morality Tale?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Meredith L. Weiss
Affiliation:
State University of New York
Allen Hicken
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Erik Martinez Kuhonta
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

To an extent unusual for Southeast Asia, parties structure Malaysian political life. These parties perform all the functions they are supposed to: they represent and organize groups in society, channel and express interests, and significantly structure social and economic as well as political life. Nearly all those parties most active and supported now are long-standing and organizationally solid; all claim a reasonably high degree of institutionalization. Moreover, by the terms of the literature engaged here, Malaysia has a strongly institutionalized party system, or “set of patterned interactions in the competition among parties.” Malaysian parties at least officially accept and follow established rules in electoral contests; the ranks of primary contenders are reasonably stable, rooted in society and organizational life, and ideologically consistent; and the same set of parties tends to hold its niche in government. Though parties themselves suffer crises, the systems holds – and generally, the same party or a dominant faction regenerates post-crisis and returns to the fray within the span of a single election cycle. Based solely on its lattice of parties, the Malaysian polity seems well positioned to support a democratic government: although party system institution need not yield democratization in any teleological way, party strengthening is commonly presumed to be a path toward developing and buttressing representative, accountable institutions.

And yet Malaysia could hardly be considered a liberal democracy. Malaysia and Singapore “are the dogs that haven’t barked”: their dominant party systems have not yielded to more competitive alternatives, as their ruling parties have remained unified overall, and their regimes highly resilient. Parties in Malaysia observe established rules for electoral competition to an extent, but not only are these rules arguably skewed (e.g., by limits on free speech and assembly) but also breaches by the dominant coalition go unchecked.

Type
Chapter
Information
Party System Institutionalization in Asia
Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past
, pp. 25 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Jason P. 2004. The Internet, Reformasi and Democratisation in Malaysia. In Gomez, E. T. (Ed.), The State of Malaysia: Ethnicity, Equity and Reform, pp. 79–104. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Abraham, Collin E. R. 1997. Divide and Rule: The Roots of Race Relations in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Institute for Social Analysis (INSAN).Google Scholar
Alagappa, Muthiah. 1995. The Asian Spectrum. Journal of Democracy 6(1): 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, Simon. 1985. Barisan Nasional Dominance and Opposition Fragmentation: The Failure of Attempts to Create Opposition Cooperation in the Malaysian Party System. Asian Profile 13(1): 33–43.Google Scholar
Carlson, Matthew, and Turner, Mark. 2008. Public Support for Democratic Governance in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science 16(3): 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, William. 1997. The 1996 UMNO Party Election: “Two for the Show.”Pacific Affairs 70(3): 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, William. 2001. Malaysia’s Resilient Pseudodemocracy. Journal of Democracy 12(1): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, William. 2002. Politics in Southeast Asia: Democracy or Less. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Case, William. 2004. New Uncertainties for an Old Pseudo-Democracy: The Case of Malaysia. Comparative Politics 37(1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, James. 1996. PBDS and Ethnicity in Sarawak Politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia 26(4): 512–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huat, Chua Beng. 2007. Introduction: Political Elections as Popular Culture. In Huat, Chua Beng (Ed.), Elections as Popular Culture in Asia, pp. 1–21. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crouch, Harold. 1996. Malaysia: Do Elections Make a Difference? In Taylor, R. H. (Ed.), The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia, pp. 114–135. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Derichs, Claudia. 2004. Political Crisis and Reform in Malaysia. In Gomez, Edmund Terence (Ed.), The State of Malaysia: Ethnicity, Equity and Reform, pp. 105–129. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Noor, Farish A.. 1999. Looking for Reformasi: The Discursive Dynamics of the Reformasi Movement and Its Prospects as a Political Project. Indonesia and the Malay World 27(77): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funston, John. 1980. Malay Politics in Malaysia: A Study of UMNO and PAS. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Educational Books (Asia).Google Scholar
Funston, John. 2006. The Malay Electorate in 2004: Reversing the 1999 Result? In Swee-Hock, Saw and Kesavapany, K. (Eds.), Malaysia: Recent Trends and Challenges, pp. 132–156. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Lee, Goh Ban. 2005. The Demise of Local Government Elections and Urban Politics. In Puthucheary, Mavis and Othman, Norani (Eds.), Elections and Democracy in Malaysia, pp. 49–70. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Hari. 1991. Political Change in Malaysia: The Role of Semangat 46. Asian Survey 31(8): 712–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Hari. 1995. UMNO Leaders and Malay Rulers: The Erosion of a Special Relationship. Pacific Affairs 68(2): 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Hari. 1998. Tradition, UMNO and Political Succession in Malaysia. Third World Quarterly 19(2): 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2008. Developing Democracies in Southeast Asia: Theorizing the Role of Parties and Elections. In Kuhonta, Erik, Slater, Dan, and Vu, Tuong (Eds.), Southeast Asia in Political Science: Theory, Region, and Qualitative Analysis, pp. 80–101. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
In-Won, Hwang. 2004. Malaysia’s “Presidential Premier”: Explaining Mahathir’s Dominance. In Welsh, Bridget (Ed.), Reflections: The Mahathir Years, pp. 67–76. Washington, DC: Southeast Asia Program, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.Google Scholar
Jesudason, James V. 1995. Statist Democracy and the Limits to Civil Society in Malaysia. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 33: 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesudason, James V. 1996. The Syncretic State and the Structuring of Oppositional Politics in Malaysia. In Rodan, Garry (Ed.), Political Oppositions in Industrialising Asia, pp. 128–160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jomo, K. S. 1996. Elections’ Janus Face: Limitations and Potential in Malaysia. In Taylor, R. H. (Ed.), The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia, pp. 90–113. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, David Martin, Bell, Daniel, and Brown, David. 1995. Towards a Model of Illiberal Democracy. In Bell, Daniel et al. (Eds.), Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia, pp. 163–167. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Teik, Khoo Boo. 1997. Democracy and Authoritarianism in Malaysia since 1957: Class, Ethnicity and Changing Capitalism. In Laothamatas, Anek (Ed.), Democratization in Southeast and East Asia, pp. 46–76. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Ling, Lai Seck. 1997. Corak Pengundian di Kalangan Pengundi Cina di Kawasan Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) Seri Kembangan: Di antara Straight-ticket Voting dan Split-ticket Voting. Academic Exercise, Jabatan Sains Politik, Fakulti Sains Kemasyarakatan dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Google Scholar
Lee, Raymond L. M. 1986. Symbols of Separatism: Ethnicity and Status Politics in Contemporary Malaysia. In Lee, Raymond (Ed.), Ethnicity and Ethnic Relations in Malaysia, pp. 28–46. DeKalb: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. Consociational Democracy. World Politics 21(2): 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hai, Lim Hong. 2005. Making the System Work: The Election Commission. In Puthucheary, Mavis and Othman, Norani (Eds.), Elections and Democracy in Malaysia, pp. 249–291. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
Loh Kok Wah, Francis. 1997. Understanding Politics in Sabah and Sarawak: An Overview. Kajian Malaysia 15(12): 1–14.Google Scholar
Loh Kok Wah, Francis. 2007. Engaging the 2004 General Election in Malaysia: Contrasting Roles and Goals. In Huat, Chua Beng (Ed.), Elections as Popular Culture in Asia, pp. 115–138. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 1979. Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism versus Control. World Politics 31(3): 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R.. 1995. Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America. In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R. (Eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, pp. 1–34. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Means, Gordon P. 1991. Malaysian Politics: The Second Generation. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Means, Gordon P. 1996. Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy 7(4): 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolf, Lloyd, and Springer, J. Fred. 1977. Legislatures and Divided Societies: The Malaysian Parliament and Multi-Ethnicity. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2(2): 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ming, Ong Kian. 2005. Examining the Electoral Roll. In Puthucheary, Mavis and Othman, Norani (Eds.), Elections and Democracy in Malaysia, pp. 292–315. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
Puthucheary, Mavis, and Othman, Norani. 2005. Elections and Democracy in Malaysia. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
Randall, Vicky, and Svåsand, Lars. 2002. Party Institutionalization in New Democracies. Party Politics 8(1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saravanamuttu, Johan. 1989. Authoritarian Statism and Strategies for Democratisation: Malaysia in the 1980s. In Limqueco, Peter (Ed.), Partisan Scholarship: Essays in Honour of Renato Constantino, pp. 233–251. Manila: Journal of Contemporary Asia Publishers.Google Scholar
Saravanamuttu, Johan. 2000. Act of Betrayal: The Snuffing Out of Local Democracy in Malaysia. Aliran Monthly 20(4): 23–25.Google Scholar
Tan, Simon. 1990. The Rise of State Authoritarianism in Malaysia. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 22(3): 32–42.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. H. (Ed.). 1996. Introduction: Elections and Politics in Southeast Asia. In The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia, pp. 1–11. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.
Vasil, R. K. 1971. Politics in a Plural Society: A Study of Non-Communal Political Parties in West Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
von Vorys, Karl. 1976. Democracy without Consensus: Communalism and Political Stability in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press. Original edition, Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. 2004. Malaysia: Construction of Counterhegemonic Narratives and Agendas. In Alagappa, Muthiah (Ed.), Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space, pp. 259–291. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. 2006. Protest and Possibilities: Civil Society and Coalitions for Political Change in Malaysia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. 2009. Edging toward a New Politics in Malaysia: Civil Society at the Gate?Asian Survey 49(5): 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, Bridget. 2004. Shifting Terrain: Elections in the Mahathir Era. In Welsh, Bridget (Ed.), Reflections: The Mahathir Years, pp. 119–133. Washington, DC: Southeast Asia Program, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.Google Scholar
Nain, Zaharom. 2002. The Structure of the Media Industry: Implications for Democracy. In Wah, Francis Loh Kok and Teik, Khoo Boo (Eds.), Democracy in Malaysia: Discourses and Practices, pp. 111–137. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Zakaria Haji. 1989. Malaysia: Quasi Democracy in a Divided Society. In Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin (Eds.), Democracy in Developing Countries, Vol. 3: Asia, pp. 347–381. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Asia Times Online, May 19, 1999. Available from .
Malaysiakini, Nov. 16, 2006. Available from

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×