Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:17:53.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Cultural sensitivity: a responsible researcher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Pranee Liamputtong
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

Researchers doing research with ethnic minorities should be cognisant of the customs, values, and beliefs of the target group(s) before designing any project.

(Hunt & Bhopal 2004: 621)

Cultural sensitivity is an important issue in conducting research with people from different cultures (Weinfurt & Maghaddam 2001; Papadopoulos & Lees 2002; Walsh-Tapiata 2003; Hall & Kulig 2004; dé Ishtar 2005a, 2005b; Birman 2006; Liamputtong 2008). Cultural sensitivity, according to Joan Sieber (1992: 20), is ‘the understanding and approaches that enable one to gain access to individuals in a given culture and to learn about their actual lifestyles (beliefs, habits, needs, fears and risks)’. In Phylis Eide and Carol Allen's terms (2005: 4), this is referred to as knowing the cultural context of the group that the researchers wish to work with. The researchers exhibit ‘cultural sensitivity and competence’ through their knowledge of the key values of the social groups. They also need to demonstrate ‘culturally appropriate communication and willingness to learn’.

Without appropriate cultural sensitivity, misunderstanding or (worse) racist attitudes may surface and this will jeopardise the progress of research, or at the extreme level, the termination of your project. Bahira Sherif (2001: 444) tells us about her experiences while conducting research in Egypt. Some of her American colleagues who dressed in ‘a very provocative manner’ repeatedly said that they were extremely displeased with ‘the unwanted attention’ from the men on the streets.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carter, J. (2004). Research note: Reflections on interviewing across the ethnic divide. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7(4), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawla, D. (2007). Subjectivity and the ‘native’ ethnographer: Researcher eligibility in an ethnographic study of urban Indian women in Hindu arranged marriages. International Journal of Qualitative Methodology 5(4), Article 2. www/ualberta. ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/chawla. pdf Accessed: 2 January 2007.Google Scholar
Choi, J-a. (2006) Doing poststructural ethnography in the life history of dropouts in South Korea: Methodological ruminations on subjectivity, positionality, and reflexivity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19(4), 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egharevba, I. (2001). Researching an-‘other’ minority ethnic community: Reflectoins of a black female researcher on the intersection of race, gender, and other power positions on the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 4(3), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, B. (2001). The ambiguity of boundaries in the fieldwork experience: Establishing rapport and negotiating insider/outsider status. Qualitative Inquiry 7(4), 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sin, C. H. (2007). Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: Reversing the gaze on ‘white others’ and ‘white’ as ‘other’. Qualitative Research 7(4), 477–499.Google Scholar
Subedi, B. (2007). Recognizing respondents' ways of being and knowing: Lessons un/learned in researching Asian immigrant and Asian-American teachers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20(10), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh-Tapiata, W. (2003). A model for Maori research: Te whakaeke i te ao rangahau o te Maori. In Munford, R. & Sanders, J. (Eds.), Making a difference in families: Research that creates change (pp. 55–73). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×