This concluding chapter revisits the tour guides discussed in Chapter 4 and explores how they were instructed by representatives of the state to include the term xiangchou into their scripts. The repetition of xiangchou within the old heritage site illustrates the salience of the term, its cultural resonance, as well as its political influence. However, the tour guides’ personal interpretations of xiangchou also demonstrates the way the state’s appropriation of the term had created new forms of alienation: some Heyang locals feel homesick for a hometown they once knew and seems no longer to be. A divide has emerged between the xiangchou that drew urban tourists to Heyang, the xiangchou that locals hold for the Heyang of their childhood, the xiangchou expressed as a form of concern for the future of their hometown, and the xiangchou that the state invoked to implement its policy objectives upon the village.

Through a case study of the T’aegǔkki rallies beginning in late 2016, Chapter 6 examines why and how senior citizens took to the streets in large numbers to protest the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye and oppose the democratic and peaceful candlelight demonstrations. Analyzing the widespread emotions and narratives expressed by these older protesters, I argue that right-wing elites and intellectuals marshaled citizens by evoking historical experiences that aroused intense fear and outrage among older generations. In this chapter, I describe why the protests resonated so deeply with elderly citizens by focusing on their lived experiences during the Korean War and postwar industrialization and how the rise of new digital media inspired them to take to the streets on a large scale. Through grassroots organizing and by harnessing feelings of victimhood and fear among ordinary citizens, rightists cultivated a fertile ground for conservative mobilization.

Chapter 3 examines what the right’s institutional infrastructure has consisted of and how it has operated. Focusing on this right-wing infrastructure – the set of organizations, institutions, and groups essential to enable, maintain, and enhance rightist political goals and environment – helps us to analyze how different organizations play distinct but interconnected roles, complement one another (albeit conflicting at times), and reinforce their common political causes. During the authoritarian period (1961–87), the mainstream conservative party, state apparatuses, state-sponsored organizations, and conservative media were used by the governments to control citizens and promote state propaganda. Following democratization, state power was decentralized and the possibility of future military coups was eventually ended, but the democratic transition did not completely undo the ancien régime. I argue that, despite the overthrow of formal authoritarianism, the organizational infrastructures that helped sustain past regimes are still present in the post-authoritarian period and play a key role in perpetuating conservative values and obstructing social, political, and economic reforms. By describing how right-wing organizations and state institutions have interacted, formed a broad alliance for shared purposes, and served as the critical bedrock of the right-wing ecosystem, this chapter emphasizes the interactive and relational nature of right-wing entities.