To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Mary Astell (1666–1731) relies on a Cartesian account of the self to argue that both men and women are essentially thinking things and, hence, that both should perfect their minds or intellects. In offering such an account of the self, Astell might seem to ignore the inescapable fact that we have bodies. This chapter argues that Astell accommodates the self’s embodiment along two main dimensions. First, she tempers her sharp distinction between mind and body by insisting on their union. The mind and body are united in such a way that they exert reciprocal causal influence and form a whole together. Second, she argues that the mind–body union is good, that the union has its own distinctive form of good or perfection, and that the mind should pursue this good alongside its own.
The introduction summarizes the contributions of Charles Taylor’s ambitious work, Sources of the Self, attending particularly to its introductory section “Identity and the Good.” It then highlights the ways in which this volume expands the conversation started by Taylor’s work: in its coverage of multiple disciplines and genres, not just philosophy and philosophical writing; in its attention to non-canonical sources and previously overlooked periods (Taylor passes directly from Augustine to Descartes); and in its development of Taylor’s “webs of interlocution” into consideration of how we – and our sources – might offer accounts of truly embodied selves, situated in ordinary lives. Finally, the introduction offers a summary of the chapters in this volume.
Chapter IX argues that ekphrasis originated in the ancient Near East rather than in Classical anituityh discussing examples from a royal building hymn, royal inscriptions and Late Babylonian propagandistic literature.
This chapter revisits the question of Renaissance individualism by focusing on the writings of two early propagators of the Italian Renaissance: Petrarch and Boccaccio. Through an analysis of their literary dialogues with central medieval authorities and institutions, it argues that both authors develop a highly personal, earthbound conception of a relational self. In their engagements with figures such as Augustine (for Petrarch) and Dante (for Boccaccio), they challenge traditional structures of order and meaning, questioning their relevance to contemporary experience and thereby opening a space for an individualism that may be described as “modern.” The chapter also demonstrates that these dialogues are not purely agonistic or triumphant, but reveal the costs and contradictions of this emerging individualism – whether in its lack of metaphysical grounding or its destabilizing effects on the social fabric. Rather than simply discarding old authorities, Petrarch and Boccaccio’s representations of the self often seek to reconcile the old with the new, individualism with tradition, and self with others, anticipating Charles Taylor’s emphasis on the relational nature of the self.
Chapter II discusses former approaches to Mesopotamian mythology in Assyriology that conceived of myth as either ‘primitive’ and ‘mythopoeic’; as an explanation of natural phenomena and political realities; as a reflection of historical events; and as a negotiation of gender roles, as well as attempts towards outlining the intertextuality of mythical narratives.
The article discusses why Classics is important and why its study benefits not just university students but also young children. It was runner-up in the Intermediate Category for a Classical Association competition in 2025. The article explores the value of Classics as a wonderfully diverse subject involving the study of history, archaeology, architecture, art, and literature. Classics enables students to study over a thousand years of history, to uncover cultural values, to discover how language operates, to develop critical analysis skills, and to delight in its timeless literature. The article explores how the study of Classics can benefit young students’ reading and writing proficiency and can be especially beneficial for those with special educational needs. It explores how Latin translation builds code cracking and cognitive skills, not only developing grammatical knowledge but also encouraging problem-solving suited to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-based subjects such as computer science and maths. The article looks at the interdisciplinary nature of the subject and the benefits of learning Latin and Greek vocabulary for language learning and science.
This article presents a case study of an undergraduate workshop at Oxford University which, using the Corsi Collection of the Oxford University Museum of Natural History, focused on the identification and appreciation of coloured marbles, of the sort seen in ancient sculpture and architecture. Grounded in object-based learning (OBL), but conducted within the constraints of a predominantly text-based and classroom-bound curriculum, the workshop employed direct object engagement to foster observational skills, material literacy, and critical reflection on ancient resource use, offering students a chance to interact directly with Roman decorative materials. It aimed to demonstrate the pedagogical value of tactile engagement with artefacts in developing historical understanding, enhancing student enthusiasm, and embedding experiential learning within a traditionally text-centric curriculum. Drawing on theoretical frameworks developed by Hannan et al. and Laurillard, this paper argues that the integration of material-focused pedagogies can meaningfully boost student engagement and learning outcomes, while also contributing to broader institutional discussions about teaching excellence and student success. The outcomes demonstrate the significant pedagogical potential of object-based learning (OBL), especially in disciplines like Classics where material culture is often under-represented. In reflecting on outcomes, challenges, and broader applicability, the article advocates for wider adoption of OBL within Classics and outlines practical ways in which it can complement standard university teaching.
This paper examines the dynamics of religious transformation in North Africa during the second and third centuries AD, challenging traditional narratives rooted in culture-historical models and simplistic cultural labels, such as the purported ‘Africanisation’ of cults under the Severan dynasty. While past scholarship has often framed these changes in terms of cultural permanence, resistance, or renaissance, this study shows that they are instead deeply embedded within the broader social and economic practices of the Roman Empire and, at the same time, reflect local and micro-regional dynamics. The paper adopts a multifold approach to reinterpretation: the onomastic attributes of gods and devotees; the iconography and materiality of divine representations; the architectural forms of temples and their functions. By reanalysing key material corpora, this contribution highlights how cultic patterns were shaped by factors such as economic networks, the proliferation of stone-made monuments, and the involvement of an expanding ‘middle-class’ base of worshippers. A specific focus is placed on the cult of Saturn, often viewed as emblematic of African religious identity or continuity. This study argues instead that the second–third century boom in Saturn worship reflects broader imperial trends, including the rise in monumentalisation and shifting patterns of religious patronage. By dismantling previous assumptions and employing relational and materiality-focused methodologies, the paper offers a revised framework for understanding the interplay between local traditions and imperial dynamics in shaping religious practices in Roman Africa.
Hippocrates is traditionally believed to have had a son-in-law and pupil named Polybus, who, thanks to Aristotle’s direct attribution, is also often regarded as the author of the surviving ‘Hippocratic’ treatise On the Nature of the Human Being (Nat. Hom.), the source of the canonical theory of the four humours. This article accepts that Polybus was indeed the author of On the Nature of the Human Being, but aims to show that his status as Hippocrates’ son-in-law is a Hellenistic invention, inspired by the conflicting attribution of the treatise to Hippocrates once it had become part of the Hippocratic Corpus. This also allows a re-dating of On the Nature of the Human Being to the mid fifth century, so that both Polybus and his four-humour theory likely predate Hippocrates’ period of activity.