To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Hadwiger’s conjecture asserts that every graph without a $K_t$-minor is $(t-1)$-colourable. It is known that the exact version of Hadwiger’s conjecture does not extend to list colouring, but it has been conjectured by Kawarabayashi and Mohar (2007) that there exists a constant $c$ such that every graph with no $K_t$-minor has list chromatic number at most $ct$. More specifically, they also conjectured that this holds for $c=\frac{3}{2}$.
Refuting the latter conjecture, we show that the maximum list chromatic number of graphs with no $K_t$-minor is at least $(2-o(1))t$, and hence $c \ge 2$ in the above conjecture is necessary. This improves the previous best lower bound by Barát, Joret and Wood (2011), who proved that $c \ge \frac{4}{3}$. Our lower-bound examples are obtained via the probabilistic method.
For a subgraph $G$ of the blow-up of a graph $F$, we let $\delta ^*(G)$ be the smallest minimum degree over all of the bipartite subgraphs of $G$ induced by pairs of parts that correspond to edges of $F$. Johansson proved that if $G$ is a spanning subgraph of the blow-up of $C_3$ with parts of size $n$ and $\delta ^*(G) \ge \frac{2}{3}n + \sqrt{n}$, then $G$ contains $n$ vertex disjoint triangles, and presented the following conjecture of Häggkvist. If $G$ is a spanning subgraph of the blow-up of $C_k$ with parts of size $n$ and $\delta ^*(G) \ge \left(1 + \frac 1k\right)\frac n2 + 1$, then $G$ contains $n$ vertex disjoint copies of $C_k$ such that each $C_k$ intersects each of the $k$ parts exactly once. A similar conjecture was also made by Fischer and the case $k=3$ was proved for large $n$ by Magyar and Martin.
In this paper, we prove the conjecture of Häggkvist asymptotically. We also pose a conjecture which generalises this result by allowing the minimum degree conditions in each bipartite subgraph induced by pairs of parts of $G$ to vary. We support this new conjecture by proving the triangle case. This result generalises Johannson’s result asymptotically.
A graph $H$ is common if the number of monochromatic copies of $H$ in a 2-edge-colouring of the complete graph $K_n$ is asymptotically minimised by the random colouring. Burr and Rosta, extending a famous conjecture of Erdős, conjectured that every graph is common. The conjectures of Erdős and of Burr and Rosta were disproved by Thomason and by Sidorenko, respectively, in the late 1980s. Collecting new examples of common graphs had not seen much progress since then, although very recently a few more graphs were verified to be common by the flag algebra method or the recent progress on Sidorenko’s conjecture. Our contribution here is to provide several new classes of tripartite common graphs. The first example is the class of so-called triangle trees, which generalises two theorems by Sidorenko and answers a question of Jagger, Šťovíček, and Thomason from 1996. We also prove that, somewhat surprisingly, given any tree $T$, there exists a triangle tree such that the graph obtained by adding $T$ as a pendant tree is still common. Furthermore, we show that adding arbitrarily many apex vertices to any connected bipartite graph on at most $5$ vertices yields a common graph.
We show that the diameter of a uniformly drawn spanning tree of a simple connected graph on n vertices with minimal degree linear in n is typically of order $\sqrt{n}$. A byproduct of our proof, which is of independent interest, is that on such graphs the Cheeger constant and the spectral gap are comparable.
Leonard Euler’s ingenious approach to the conundrum which surrounded the seven bridges of Königsberg provided us not only with the definite solution to this intriguing problem, but also planted the seed from which the mathematical field of graph theory germinated. Although Euler’s now-historic negative resolution ended the tedious explorative search for a viable path through the city by inspired inhabitants and visitors of this Prussian town, this brute-force approach certainly merits further investigation in light of many modern-day problems which rely on such an approach due to the lack of better options. Is it possible to formulate this active exploration of the network of Königsberg’s bridges in mathematical terms? The affirmative answer to this question leads us to another field of mathematics, operator theory. This chapter will provide a coarse introduction into the very basics of operator calculus, the algebraic tool utilised to describe operations on and mappings between finite vector spaces. The application of this formalism to graph-theoretical objects will then establish the conceptual framework for Operator Graph Theory, the central objective of this book.
What do the bridges of Königsberg, synaptically connected neurons in our brains and the galaxies illuminating the dark voids of our universe have in common? All of these real-world phenomena can be described as collections of discrete discernible objects which are interlinked to form weblike structures called networks. This chapter will introduce the mathematical representation of such networks, and familiarise us with the basic concepts, ideas and terminology of a vast and ever-growing research field whose roots date back to the work of Leonard Euler. By taking a closer look at a number of concrete network models - specifically the random graph models which prominently feature as descriptive vessels for many natural phenomena - and briefly exploring some deep-rooted conceptual limitations of these models, we hope not only to motivate the need for a rigorous mathematical framework for the study of networks at finite scales, but also to accentuate the potential advantages of a more dynamical vantage point from which to view networks and their defining characteristics in later chapters of this book.
Over the course of three centuries, the field of graph theory has matured from its initial conception as an abstract model for solving a rather specific mathematical problem into a powerful vessel for describing countless real-world phenomena, with applications now reaching far beyond applied mathematics. However, its static formalisation puts a number of limitations in place which hamper an advantageous utilisation of graph-theoretical concepts in circumstances which require a more dynamical perspective. Is it possible to overcome these limitations by challenging the classical notion of a graph? In this chapter, we will propose exactly such a challenge by considering a graph’s nodes and their relations as the result of operations performed on a set of suitable objects. This subtle yet consequential change in the conception of a graph not only delivers a more dynamic vantage point, but eventually generalises the very notion of a graph by structurally equating it with an abstract algebra. This chapter will introduce the basic notions and formalisations of an operator graph-theoretical framework and candidly argue for its potential merits and usefulness.
When thinking of city maps, we instinctively envision a network of links along which an ever-changing flow of traffic is carried. Such an idealised description, however, is not limited to the maps we are all familiar with. From the interactions between atoms and subatomic particles to the gravitational forces which act between the billions of galaxies stretching across the known universe, from the transmission of electrical signals in our brains to the complexity of social interactions between people, most if not all phenomena we encounter, consciously or not, find a natural representation in the form of networks. Indeed, it can be argued that the abstract notion of interacting objects resides at the very heart of our conceptual understanding of nature as it touches upon the very fabric of physical reality with its finite and discrete makeup. How can we leverage the mathematical study of interconnected objects, the theory of networks and graphs, in our quest of understanding nature, and what are its limitations?
On our adventurous journey, we formalised in the previous chapter the generation of various finite random graph models in terms of suitable algebraic objects and obtained representations of these models which reside beyond their classical or algorithmic descriptions. This approach naturally paves the way for a more rigorous investigation of the vast plethora of graph-theoretical measures that typically are, or only can be, considered in tedious and demanding numerical studies, or under stringent limitations in asymptotic assessments. In this chapter, we will exemplify how the properties of the algebraic objects governing the generation of graphs can be exploited, and how parametrised expressions for a variety of graph measures can be obtained. Here we must restrict our gaze into the sheer limitless realm of possibilities to a few selected directions. By highlighting some of the differences to already available results from a conceptual and mathematical vantage point, we will continue to argue for the necessity of a study of networks at finite scales, for which our operator graph-theoretical framework presents itself as one viable approach.