To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Although the automatic sequences form a large and interesting class, one drawback is that they need to take their values in a finite set. But many interesting sequences, such as (s2(n))n.0 (counting the sum of the bits in the base-2 representation of n), take their values in N (or Z, or any semiring). We would like to find a generalization that allows this.
Up to now our logical formulas have allowed us to state formulas concerning a single automatic sequence, or perhaps two at the same time (as in Section 8.9.3). In some cases, however, it’s possible to use our approach to prove results about infinitely many sequences (even uncountably many sequences) at once!
In this paper, we study asymmetric Ramsey properties of the random graph $G_{n,p}$. Let $r \in \mathbb{N}$ and $H_1, \ldots, H_r$ be graphs. We write $G_{n,p} \to (H_1, \ldots, H_r)$ to denote the property that whenever we colour the edges of $G_{n,p}$ with colours from the set $[r] \,{:\!=}\, \{1, \ldots, r\}$ there exists $i \in [r]$ and a copy of $H_i$ in $G_{n,p}$ monochromatic in colour $i$. There has been much interest in determining the asymptotic threshold function for this property. In several papers, Rödl and Ruciński determined a threshold function for the general symmetric case; that is, when $H_1 = \cdots = H_r$. A conjecture of Kohayakawa and Kreuter from 1997, if true, would fully resolve the asymmetric problem. Recently, the $1$-statement of this conjecture was confirmed by Mousset, Nenadov and Samotij.
Building on work of Marciniszyn, Skokan, Spöhel and Steger from 2009, we reduce the $0$-statement of Kohayakawa and Kreuter’s conjecture to a certain deterministic subproblem. To demonstrate the potential of this approach, we show this subproblem can be resolved for almost all pairs of regular graphs. This therefore resolves the $0$-statement for all such pairs of graphs.
We suggest two related conjectures dealing with the existence of spanning irregular subgraphs of graphs. The first asserts that any $d$-regular graph on $n$ vertices contains a spanning subgraph in which the number of vertices of each degree between $0$ and $d$ deviates from $\frac{n}{d+1}$ by at most $2$. The second is that every graph on $n$ vertices with minimum degree $\delta$ contains a spanning subgraph in which the number of vertices of each degree does not exceed $\frac{n}{\delta +1}+2$. Both conjectures remain open, but we prove several asymptotic relaxations for graphs with a large number of vertices $n$. In particular we show that if $d^3 \log n \leq o(n)$ then every $d$-regular graph with $n$ vertices contains a spanning subgraph in which the number of vertices of each degree between $0$ and $d$ is $(1+o(1))\frac{n}{d+1}$. We also prove that any graph with $n$ vertices and minimum degree $\delta$ contains a spanning subgraph in which no degree is repeated more than $(1+o(1))\frac{n}{\delta +1}+2$ times.
Automatic sequences are sequences over a finite alphabet generated by a finite-state machine. This book presents a novel viewpoint on automatic sequences, and more generally on combinatorics on words, by introducing a decision method through which many new results in combinatorics and number theory can be automatically proved or disproved with little or no human intervention. This approach to proving theorems is extremely powerful, allowing long and error-prone case-based arguments to be replaced by simple computations. Readers will learn how to phrase their desired results in first-order logic, using free software to automate the computation process. Results that normally require multipage proofs can emerge in milliseconds, allowing users to engage with mathematical questions that would otherwise be difficult to solve. With more than 150 exercises included, this text is an ideal resource for researchers, graduate students, and advanced undergraduates studying combinatorics, sequences, and number theory.
We show that the $4$-state anti-ferromagnetic Potts model with interaction parameter $w\in (0,1)$ on the infinite $(d+1)$-regular tree has a unique Gibbs measure if $w\geq 1-\dfrac{4}{d+1_{_{\;}}}$ for all $d\geq 4$. This is tight since it is known that there are multiple Gibbs measures when $0\leq w\lt 1-\dfrac{4}{d+1}$ and $d\geq 4$. We moreover give a new proof of the uniqueness of the Gibbs measure for the $3$-state Potts model on the $(d+1)$-regular tree for $w\geq 1-\dfrac{3}{d+1}$ when $d\geq 3$ and for $w\in (0,1)$ when $d=2$.
Networks are convenient mathematical models to represent the structure of complex systems, from cells to societies. In the last decade, multilayer network science – the branch of the field dealing with units interacting in multiple distinct ways, simultaneously – was demonstrated to be an effective modeling and analytical framework for a wide spectrum of empirical systems, from biopolymers networks (such as interactome and metabolomes) to neuronal networks (such as connectomes), from social networks to urban and transportation networks. In this Element, a decade after one of the most seminal papers on this topic, the authors review the most salient features of multilayer network science, covering both theoretical aspects and direct applications to real-world coupled/interdependent systems, from the point of view of multilayer structure, dynamics and function. The authors discuss potential frontiers for this topic and the corresponding challenges in the field for the next future.
We find an asymptotic enumeration formula for the number of simple $r$-uniform hypergraphs with a given degree sequence, when the number of edges is sufficiently large. The formula is given in terms of the solution of a system of equations. We give sufficient conditions on the degree sequence which guarantee existence of a solution to this system. Furthermore, we solve the system and give an explicit asymptotic formula when the degree sequence is close to regular. This allows us to establish several properties of the degree sequence of a random $r$-uniform hypergraph with a given number of edges. More specifically, we compare the degree sequence of a random $r$-uniform hypergraph with a given number edges to certain models involving sequences of binomial or hypergeometric random variables conditioned on their sum.
A typical modern computational system is structured like a tower, with eachlayer’s proper behavior contingent on the correctness of the onebelow. The website that you use to send money to a friend relies on both astack of networking protocols (HTTP relying on TCP, which is relying on IP,etc.), as well as a stack of applications on your computer or your phone(your browser relying on your operating system, which is relying on thehardware itself). A key theme in computer science is this idea ofabstraction: that, so long as it’s workingproperly, you can rely on the next layer in one of these towers (or afunction in a large program, or . ..) without worryingabout how exactly it works. You just have to trustthat it works.
Imagine converting a color photograph to grayscale (as in Figure 2.1).Implementing this conversion requires interacting with a slew offoundational data types (the basic “kinds of things”) thatshow up throughout CS. A pixel is a sequence of three colorvalues, red, green, and blue. (And an image is a two-dimensional sequence ofpixels.)
This book is designed for an undergraduate student who has taken a computerscience class or three. Most likely, you are a sophomore or juniorprospective or current computer science major taking your firstnon-programming-based CS class. If you are a student in this position, youmay be wondering why you’re taking this class (or why youhave to take this class!).
In which our heroes encounter many choices, some of which may lead them tolive more happily than others, and a precise count of their number ofoptions is calculated.
Imagine writing a program to implement a student registration system at acollege or university. When a student is registering for classes,you’ll need to be able to answer questions of the form “isAlice eligible to be added to the roster for Price Theory?” to decidewhether to allow her to click to add that particular course. To do so,you’ll need to know Price Theory’s prerequisites: what classesmust you have already passed before you can take Price Theory?
I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, andexpress it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannotmeasure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of ameagre and unsatisfactory kind.
This chapter introduces probability, the study ofrandomness. Our focus, as will be no surprise by this point of the book, ison building a formal mathematical framework for analyzing random processes.We’ll begin with a definition of the basics of probability: defininga random process that chooses one particular outcome from aset of possibilities (any one of which occurs some fraction of the time).We’ll then analyze the likelihood that a particularevent occurs—in other words, asking whether thechosen outcome has some particular property that we care about. We thenconsider independence and dependence ofevents, and conditional probability: how, if at all, doesknowing that the randomly chosen outcome has one particular property changeour calculation of the probability that it has a different property?