To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study investigated an 18‑week teacher education model grounded in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Known as CATERR (comprehending, analyzing, teaching, evaluating, reflecting, and refining), this teacher education model cultivated the computer-assisted language learning (CALL) competencies of 43 content and language integrated learning (CLIL) preservice teachers (PSTs) from Taiwan. The model promotes peer coaching, where participants collaborate, reflect, and refine their teaching over three rounds. The study utilized a multi-method case study and triangulated the quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data refers to the TPACK-CLIL questionnaire administered before and after the teacher education model. Qualitative data included lesson plans, self-analysis, teaching demonstration videos, revised lesson plans, classroom discussion records, peer evaluations, and reflection notes. Data analysis involved paired-samples t-tests and descriptive statistics for the coding framework, thematic analysis for qualitative data, and a repeated measures ANOVA to compare three total scores across three rounds using scoring rubrics. Results showed that the CATERR teacher education model enhanced CLIL PSTs’ self-perceived and observed CALL competencies. Specifically, as “digital native” PSTs with high levels of technological knowledge (TK), they successfully transferred their TK into TPACK by adding pedagogical values and contextualizing the ICT tools in their CLIL lessons. Meanwhile, their ability to use ICT tools to facilitate interaction and students’ autonomous learning substantially improved. The theoretical and pedagogical implications for CALL teacher education research and practice are discussed.
Learning to Teach in a New Era provides a positive, future-oriented approach to preparing preservice and beginning teachers to teach and to embrace the rewarding aspects of working in the educational sphere. Learning to Teach in a New Era supports learners to understand and address the mandatory accreditation requirements of teaching in Australia. Emerging teachers are encouraged to develop and reflect on their philosophies of teaching, supported by features including scenarios, teacher reflections, critical thinking questions, research activities and review questions. This edition features a significant new chapter exploring the importance of trauma-informed practice, and incorporates expanded discussions about diversity and inclusion. Written by a team of authors with diverse expertise in the field of education, Learning to Teach in a New Era provides an essential introduction to educational practice.
Despite its rich biodiversity, India faces severe environmental challenges due to human activities prioritising immediate gratification over long-term sustainability. Recognising the power of education to address environmental crises, Environmental Education (EE) emerged as a field of study to foster environmental consciousness. Hence, equipping teachers with the knowledge, skills and attitudes to effectively integrate environmental education into their pedagogy is crucial for cultivating sustainable behaviour in students. However, research indicated a significant gap in teacher preparedness to effectively address environmental issues, leaving them ill-equipped to implement related activities and tasks in their classrooms. Using qualitative content analysis, the EE-related courses were analysed to study their status, orientation and responsiveness within three pre-service teacher education programmes. The results of the study showed that most environment-related courses are not compulsory and largely have an anthropocentric orientation with a limited socio-scientific approach. The courses are required to be made responsive toward the contemporary issues and concerns related to Education for Sustainable Development.
This article explores how water conditions in geographical contexts could influence the construction of teachers’ professional identities and, consequently, their knowledge and beliefs about water sustainability. Water sustainability is defined as the responsible management of water from a perspective that integrates environmental, social and economic sustainability principles. This quantitative study employed an ad hoc questionnaire, inspired by the New Water Culture principles as a conceptual sustainability framework. The instrument, designed with Google Forms, was administered to 221 secondary school teachers from two cities with contrasting water and cultural conditions: Bogotá (Colombia) and Melilla (Spain). Results indicate that teachers’ knowledge and beliefs in both cities are not aligned with water sustainability principles, with no significant differences between the two groups due to their different water conditions. However, there are partial differences related to the respective personal experiences: in Bogotá, teachers show greater concern for water quality, whereas in Melilla the focus is more on the quantity available. These findings underline the importance of promoting teachers’ professional development in water sustainability aligned with professional identities, as a key strategy for nurturing aware and engaged citizens. This approach is fundamental to tackle water stress challenges and foster a paradigm shift towards more responsible, sustainable lifestyles globally.
This article explores young children’s relations with soil, drawing on research that positioned soil as animate, lively and interconnected. The paper investigates how animist approaches offered a mode of encounter for children and their teachers, encouraging them to see themselves as part of a larger ecological community. The research began with a “soil biome immersion” experience where teachers engaged with soil through sensory and arts-based experiences. These initial encounters led to further exploration of child-soil relations through experiential learning and storytelling. Children, as active meaning-makers, co-constructed the inquiry through imaginative and sensory engagements. Findings suggest animism cultivates soil relations, challenging traditional notions of soil as inert and promoting a dynamic understanding of soil ecosystems. Through practices such as storying, drawing and listening, educators supported children’s animist perspectives, deepening their attunement to the more-than-human world. This article contributes to environmental education by demonstrating how animism can enrich children’s ecological awareness and their sense of connectedness to the world.
As academia increasingly comes under attack in the United States, The War on Tenure steps in to demystify what professors do and to explain the importance of tenure for their work. Deepa Das Acevedo takes readers on a backstage tour of tenure-stream academia to reveal hidden dynamics and obstacles. She challenges the common belief that tenure is only important for the protection of academic freedom. Instead, she argues that the security and autonomy provided by tenure are also essential to the performance of work that students, administrators, parents, politicians, and taxpayers value. Going further, Das Acevedo shows that tenure exists on a spectrum of comparable employment contracts, and she debunks the notion that tenure warps the incentives of professors. Ultimately, The War on Tenure demonstrates that the job security tenure provides is not nearly as unusual, undesirable, or unwarranted as critics claim.
Chapter 24 concludes the book with several suggestions for how to improve tenure without vitiating or abandoning it. The chapter suggests, as potential lines of reform: reframing tenure as a labor protection, revising evaluation procedures, recruiting more diverse faculty, implementing teaching tenure, and avoiding punitive post-tenure review.
Chapter 9 explores the challenges faced by dual-academic couples who must both navigate the difficult job market described in Chapter 8. This chapter explains why the “two-body problem” is particularly acute in academia, illustrates the toll it can take on mental and physical well-being, and discusses both university and faculty responses to the phenomenon.
Chapter 3 explains the material sacrifices required to gain a PhD, which is the threshold credential for most faculty positions. The chapter uses doctoral debt statistics, media coverage, and social science literature to show that aspiring academics do not enjoy privileged lives during either graduate school or the “post-doc queue” that often follows it.
Chapter 16 picks up where Chapter 6 left off in the history of tenure by explaining how tenure became a dominant industry practice. It draws on educational history to show that, even if tenure’s now-familiar form was articulated by faculty via the AAUP, tenure’s adoption across American academia was largely spurred by university leaders who saw it as a valuable recruitment and retention tool for an increasingly professionalized workforce.
Chapter 23 synthesizes the information presented in the book to explain why tenure matters not only for the current and aspiring faculty who are directly impacted by it, but for the students, parents, administrators, politicians, and citizens who may think that tenure is the peculiar concern of professors. The chapter also draws on higher education expenditure statistics to show why arguments sounding in budgetary shortfalls are inadequate justifications for reductions in tenure-stream employment.
Chapter 5 explains what tenure legally entails in order to temper the claim that tenure is exceptional in the landscape of employment contracts. It argues that tenure is merely a variation on the “just cause” contracts applied to many workers and that the protections of just cause are necessitated by a uniquely American default rule, namely, that most employment relationships are terminable “at-will.”
Chapter 6 tells the pre-history of tenure beginning with the colonial era and proceeding until the AAUP’s 1940 Statement, which is widely credited with defining what faculty tenure means in the United States. The chapter shows that many key legal elements of tenure have existed since the seventeenth century, and that employment concerns like job security played a much larger role in shaping academic employment than is commonly acknowledged.
Chapter 14 dismantles a third myth regarding tenure’s effects on individual faculty incentives, namely, that tenure dampens academic productivity. The chapter shows there is little empirical proof supporting this assumption but some proof against it, and argues that claims about declining productivity reflect a simplistic and unwarranted belief that faculty are rational maximizers whose sole motivation is employment security.
Chapter 21 slices TTS data from yet another angle, this time according to whether terminated faculty voluntarily quit or were involuntarily fired. The chapter shows that academia is not merely a refuge for workers who cannot succeed in the general labor force because, among other things, faculty whose disciplinary backgrounds give them better exit options do not seem to relinquish their positions more easily.
Chapter 17 considers the relationship between tenure-stream academia and unionization – a relationship that is often incorrectly believed to be nonexistent. The chapter argues that self-perception isn’t all that stands between tenure-stream faculty and collective action because multiple legal frameworks as well as the daily rhythms and realities of tenure-stream life discourage rootedness and community-building.