To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
History is not just a recounting of events; it is shaped by narrative style, cognitive frameworks, and the selection of time frames, all of which influence how events are understood. The chapter delves into the ‘linguistic turn’ in history, where language plays a crucial role in expressing and interpreting the past. Key elements of historical discourse, including narration, voice, time, and causation, are examined in depth.
The chapter also addresses the challenges of teaching history in a second language (L2), emphasizing the need for specialized instructional tools and rhetorical models. With references to a comprehensive chart of integrated descriptors for history across the curriculum and a genre map for bilingual history teaching, it underscores how controlling historical discourse through language can influence societies. Thus, this work also highlights the intersection of history, language, and ideology, especially in multilingual contexts.
This chapter explores the role of syntax in language development, showing how sentence structure evolves in bilinguals. Early L2 learners rely on L1 syntax or imitation, gradually forming independent L2 structures. Over time, L1 and L2 syntax merge, creating shared language nodes. Research confirms that both grammar systems remain active during language use.
Syntactic complexity is key to proficiency, measured through indices like clause structure and subordination. Advances in computational tools, such as Coh-Metrix and L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer, allow automated analysis of syntax. Studies show that bilinguals develop longer sentences, longer and more complex noun phrases, and more subordinate clauses over time.
Children worldwide follow a natural syntax progression – juxtaposition first, subordination later, and nominalization at higher levels. Bilinguals display unique patterns, with advanced L2 learners favouring longer sentences, relative clauses, and passive structures. This chapter highlights syntax’s role in bilingual growth and its impact on proficiency assessment.
This chapter explores language as a form of capital – both cultural and symbolic – and its role in social inequality. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory (1986), it examines how language distribution reinforces power structures, with ruling classes controlling literacy in specialized fields. The ‘linguistic deficit’ theory links lower socioeconomic status (SES) with limited language resources, leading to educational and social deficits. It also introduces the Matthew effect, where students with more language capital accumulate even more, and the Great Gatsby Curve, suggesting that inequality in language resources perpetuates social stratification.
Through a series of case studies of bilingualism, the chapter illustrates how language shapes social power dynamics. It argues that, in a globalized world, bilingualism – often a privilege in elite education – should be made available to all to address broader social inequities. Only through multilingual education will language policies reduce inequality and enable true social mobility.
Biliteracy is a lifelong process shaped by social and educational factors. While some achieve full biliteracy, others struggle with semi-lingualism. This chapter explores key dimensions of biliteracy – contexts, media, content, and development – showing how language status and literacy traditions impact learning.
A case study follows a Spanish–English bilingual’s journey from being initiated in L1 writing to mastering L2 academic composition, illustrating multilingual education’s potential. However, many systems resist bilingual programmes due to cultural and political factors. This chapter examines biliteracy challenges in Ceuta, Melilla, and the United States, where policies shape outcomes.
Biliteracy is fluid – language dominance shifts over time, requiring educational support. Successful programmes recognize students’ linguistic repertoires, easing language transitions. Research confirms bilingual learners excel when home language literacy is included in instruction. This chapter will help to understand biliteracy’s evolving nature, which is key to building inclusive, effective education systems.
This chapter delves into the critical role of lexis in L1 and L2 acquisition, exploring how vocabulary reflects language development and impacts text quality. The mental lexicon forms an intricate web of semantic connections, with bilinguals processing words differently based on proficiency. Low-proficiency learners rely on L1 translation, while advanced speakers strengthen direct links to L2 vocabulary. Research shows that both languages remain active during lexical tasks, shaping bilingual cognition.
Lexical richness is analysed through key models, including Crossley’s and Jarvis’. Advances in natural language processing have enabled automated evaluation tools like Coh-Metrix and TAALES, enhancing lexical analysis.
As bilinguals progress, their writing becomes more diverse and sophisticated, though L1 and L2 development may diverge in features like word concreteness. Formulaic language is also crucial – high-proficiency L2 writers use more native-like phrasal structures. By examining lexical acquisition, this chapter highlights its significance in bilingual proficiency, providing insights into how vocabulary shapes linguistic competence.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has been heralded by some as a transformational force in education. It is argued to have the potential to reduce inequality and democratize the learning experience, particularly in the Global South. Others warn of the dangers of techno-solutionism, dehumanization of learners, and a widening digital divide. The reality, as so often, may be more complicated than this juxtaposition suggests. In our study, we investigated the ways in which GenAI can contribute to independent language learning in the context of Pakistan. We were particularly interested in the roles of five variables that have been shown to be particularly salient in this and similar contexts: learners’ Generative Artificial Intelligence-mediated Informal Digital Learning of English (GenAI-IDLE) participation, AI Literacy, Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE) and Foreign Language Boredom (FLB), and their second language Willingness to Communicate (L2 WTC). Employing a structural equation modelling approach, we surveyed 359 Pakistani English as a foreign language (EFL) learners to investigate their interrelationships between variables. The results demonstrate that EFL learners’ GenAI-IDLE activity directly and positively influences AI literacy and FLE. Students’ AI literacy and FLE play a chain-mediating role in the relationship between GenAI-IDLE participation and L2 WTC. However, FLB lacks predictive power over L2 WTC. We discuss the implications of these results for language learning, in particular in low-resource contexts.
In this study, we apply a stated preference experiment and discrete choice modelling to examine Greek primary teachers’ preferences for reward and consequences strategies in supporting students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. We also investigate how these preferences differ based on teacher gender, educational attainment, and special education training. A total of 430 general and special education teachers completed 2,948 choice cards. Each card presented hypothetical scenarios combining five behavioural management attributes: verbal praise, responses to undesired behaviours, privilege removal, point-based systems, and tangible versus intangible rewards. Data were analysed using an alternative-specific conditional logit model. Verbal praise and intangible rewards (e.g., free time, token economies) received the highest preference ratings, while reprimands and privilege revocation were consistently disfavoured. Female teachers, those with postgraduate degrees, and special education trained educators assigned significantly greater utility to informational consequences and tangible rewards. Findings reveal a strong consensus among teachers in favour of positive reinforcement strategies and a reluctance to employ punitive measures. Professional development should emphasise reward-based techniques. Future research should link these stated preferences to actual classroom practices and student outcomes to assess their real-world effectiveness.
The implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) does not always lead to successful outcomes due to various contextual factors. The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS; Aarons, 2004) assesses implementers’ attitudes towards adopting EBPs (ATE), helping to understand the discrepancy between planned and implemented EBPs. Despite the growing implementation of school-based EBPs, the EBPAS has seldom been applied to general education teachers. This study aimed to validate the EBPAS for primary school teachers in Singapore using content validity and confirmatory factor analysis and to examine how the contextual characteristics influence ATE. A total of 170 teachers from 10 schools participated anonymously in an online survey. Confirmatory factor analysis results supported the four-factor structure of the EBPAS. All subscales showed excellent to acceptable internal consistency, with Divergence being the lowest. Teachers with higher educational attainment were more likely to be open to adopting EBPs. Similarly, teachers’ perceived school leadership support was significantly associated with their ATE. However, neither years of teaching experience, years of supporting students with special educational needs, nor teacher efficacy in inclusive practices significantly predicted ATE. The study highlights the need for further refinement, particularly of the Divergence subscale, through the exploration of alternative constructs and validation with larger samples.
Autistic high school students overwhelmingly have a poor experience of school. Research into this stage of life is limited, and researchers have tended not to talk to autistic students directly, instead hearing from non-autistic observers such as teachers and parents. This study aimed to address this gap in our knowledge by interviewing autistic students in mainstream high schools about their experience of school and their ideas for how this could be improved. Ten autistic students (13 to 20 years old) in Australian high schools were interviewed. Students overwhelmingly reported a negative experience. Most said their ideal school would be one where teachers and peers had greater understanding about autism and teachers had training in autism. By including the student voice, this research makes a valuable contribution to our understanding of autistic students’ school experience, adding depth and detail, and including what they would like to see changed. Importantly, the interview data also challenged misconceptions about what autistic students prioritised. The voice of autistic teens can make an important contribution to policies and practices aimed at improving their experience of school.
This short research article interrogates the rise of digital platforms that enable ‘synthetic afterlives’, with a focus on how deathbots – AI-driven avatar interactions grounded in personal data and recordings – reshape memory practices. Drawing on socio-technical walkthroughs of four platforms – Almaya, HereAfter, Séance AI, and You, Only Virtual – we analyse how they frame, archive, and algorithmically regenerate memories. Our findings reveal a central tension: between preserving the past as a fixed archive and continually reanimating it through generative AI. Our walkthroughs demonstrate how these services commodify remembrance, reducing memory to consumer-driven interactions designed for affective engagement while obscuring the ethical, epistemological and emotional complexities of digital commemoration. In doing so, they enact reductive forms of memory that are embedded within platform economies and algorithmic imaginaries.
The adoption of corpus technology in school classroom settings remains limited, largely due to insufficient technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) training for pedagogical corpus use. To address this gap, we investigated how teacher education in corpus-based language pedagogy (CBLP), a subdomain of TPACK for corpus technology tailored to language teachers, influenced student TESOL teachers’ self-efficacy for independent language learning and teaching. Employing a mixed-methods approach, including a CBLP training intervention (n = 120), survey data (n = 96), and interviews (n = 8) with student teachers at a university in Hong Kong SAR, China, the research validates a theoretical model through confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Results demonstrate that corpus literacy (CL) is foundational for effective CBLP implementation and development of independent learning self-efficacy, which in turn fosters innovative, resource-rich instructional strategies. CBLP also enhances teachers’ self-efficacy for student engagement, fostering more interactive and motivating classrooms. These findings emphasise the value of embedding CL and CBLP within TESOL teacher-education programmes to prepare future language teachers for self-efficacy within dynamic, technology-enhanced classrooms.
This study synthesized 65 (quasi-)experimental studies published between 2010 and 2024 that examined the use of mobile applications to develop language learners’ vocabulary learning. Bayesian meta-analysis was adopted to assess (1) overall effect size; (2) subgroup analyses (i.e. education level, vocabulary knowledge, aspects of vocabulary learning, learning environment, sample size, mobile application type, gender, and cultural background); and (3) publication bias. A large effect size of 1.28 was found for the overall effectiveness of using mobile applications for vocabulary learning when we restricted the studies to long-term treatment duration of 10 weeks or above. Each moderator was analyzed and discussed, and implications for language teaching and research were provided.
To better understand language teacher turnover, this study closely replicates and extends McInerney et al.’s (2015) research, which found that teacher commitment predicted turnover intentions to schools (44.2%) and the profession (45.2%) among Hong Kong schoolteachers (N = 1,060). Given the relatively stable employment conditions in that context, the generalizability of these findings to more mobile populations, such as expatriate native English-speaking teachers (NESTs), remains uncertain. In this replication, (1) the population was changed to NESTs in East Asia, and (2) subgroup comparisons were extended to reflect distinctions relevant to the replication sample. Additionally, results were directly compared to the original. A total of 215 NESTs participated. Results showed similar directional patterns but stronger effects: commitment explained 51.8% of variance in turnover intentions to schools and 59.7% to the profession. Affective commitment was the strongest predictor, though NESTs reported lower commitment and higher turnover intentions than in the original study.