To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
It has been conjectured that, if p ≡ 1 (mod 4) is prime, and if d < 0 is a square-free discriminant with then
Where belongs to the field is the fundamental unit of Q(√k), depending on whether there are an even number or an odd number of classes per genus in Q(√d), and Ω is the genus field of Q(√d). Here the summation being over a complete set of inequivalent forms in the genus G, and
In this paper it will be shown that this conjecture is true when d is the product of two odd discriminants. An example when d is the product of three prime discriminants is discussed.
be a real quadratic form in n variables x1,…, xn and let ‖θ‖ denote the distance from θ to the nearest integer. Danicic [3] proved that if N > 1 and ξ > 0 then there exist integers x1,…, xn, not all zero, satisfying
Let P be a (convex) d-polytope in the Euclidean space Ed and p a point of Ed not contained in P or in a supporting hyperplane of a facet of P (we use the terminology of Grunbaum [2]). The part of the boundary of P which is “visible” from p, i.e. the union of those facets whose supporting hyperplanes separate p and P, form a (d – l)-ball, whose boundary is a (d – 2)-sphere S (all balls, spheres and manifolds to be considered are piecewise-linear). The boundary-complex ℬ(P) induces a subdivision of S, which we call a (sharp) shadow-boundary ofP. is combinatorially isomorphic to the boundary complex of a poly tope which is a central projection of P from the point p on a hyperplane.
One of the problems of solid state physics is to explain why the atoms of certain elements (such as iron) arrange themselves in a body-centred cubic lattice, rather than in the much denser face-centred cubic lattice packing [8]. Recently, we discovered the geometric significance of these body-centred lattice packings: they are fragile in the sense that, assuming we have a sphere of fixed radius at each lattice point, any perturbation which does not alter the set of nearest neighbours of any sphere results in a denser configuration [3]. In other words, in-these packings it is the density of the interstitial void between the spheres that is being maximized. This fact might seem only to deepen the mystery of why such arrangements ever appear in nature at all. Our purpose here is to demonstrate that these lattice packings are in fact quite “stable”, provided one seeks a more subtle form of stability, one prompted by physical rather than purely geometrical considerations. More precisely, we will show for those lattices which possess a high degree of symmetry–and for the bodycentred cubic lattice in particular–that the EPSTEIN ZETA FUNCTION of the lattice, ∑ |r|-2s (where |r| is the distance of the r-th lattice point from the origin and s is any fixed number greater than n/2), is locally minimized, in the sense that, any lattice, obtained by a perturbation which does not alter the set of nearest neighbours of any lattice point, has an Epstein zeta function of larger value, for any s > n/2.
The present investigation was suggested by a theorem of A. Schinzel, H. P. Schlickewei and W. M. Schmidt [6]: let Q(x) = Q(x1,…, xs) be a quadratic form with integer coefficients. Then for each natural number m there are integers x1,…, xs satisfying
There are at least two indices used to measure the size of bounded sets of ℝn of zero measure—Hausdorff dimension (see [4] for a definition), and the density index [7].
An exact solution for the velocity field induced by the slow rolling motion of a sphere in contact with a permeable surface is derived. The porous solid and the viscous fluid each occupies a semi-infinite space.
It is shown that, by the use of conformal mapping, the problem is reduced to a fourth order ordinary linear boundary value problem. As the permeability of the porous body diminishes the important functionals, e.g. the force and torque resisting the rolling motion of the sphere, are divergent. The nature of this divergence is found and the dependence on the permeability of the porous solid is explicitly evaluated.
It is shown that a convex body K tiles Ed by translation if, and only if, K is a centrally symmetric d-polytope with centrally symmetric facets, such that every belt of K (consisting of those of its facets which contain a translate of a given (d – 2)-face) has four or six facets. One consequence of the proof of this result is that, if K tiles Ed by translation, then K admits a face-to-face, and hence a lattice tiling.
§1. Introduction and notation. In [1] and [2], Besicovitch demonstrated that there exist plane sets of measure zero containing line segments (and indeed entire lines) in all directions in the plane. It is natural to ask about the existence of analogous sets in Euclidean spaces of higher dimensions, and in [3] we defined an (n, k)-Besicovitch set to be a subset A of Rn, of n-dimensional Lebesgue measure zero, such that for each k-dimensional subspace Π of Rn, some translate of Π intersects A in a set of positive k-dimensional measure. (Thus Besicovitch's original constructions were for (2,1)-Besicovitch sets.) Recently, Marstrand [5] has shown (by approximating to sets by unions of cubes) that no (3, 2)-Besicovitch sets exist, and simultaneously the author [3] proved using Fourier transform methods that (n, k)- Bsicovitch sets cannot exist if k > ½n.
Theorem 1. If N is a natural number and I is an interval of N consecutive integers, then there is a 1–1 correspondencef: {1, 2,…, N} → I such that (i, f(i)) = 1 for 1 ≤ i ≤ N.
On 13 February 1976 Professor T. M. Flett died at the early age of 52. At that time he had almost completed the manuscript of the present book. In order that so much effort should not be lost, I undertook the task of finishing the work. My guiding principle has been that the book is still Professor Flett's: although I have no doubt that he would have made alterations in arriving at his own final version, I am sure that the reader would wish to hear his voice, even imperfectly, rather than mine. The text he left has been altered only where there were clear indications that he himself had intended to do this or on the rare occasions when errors had crept in. A few parts of the book which he clearly proposed to include did not exist even in manuscript. The reader will wish to know that I am solely responsible for §2.13, for the historical note on differentials (§4.7) and for the notes on chapters 3 and 4. In connection with the last two I probably owe apologies to many mathematicians. I do not have Professor Flett's encyclopaedic knowledge of the literature in this field and my attribution of theorems to their originators is not as detailed as his corresponding work for the earlier chapters; I fear that some names which should have appeared will have been omitted.