To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Independence is a unifying concept for linear algebra and graphs. A deep generalization of both through this unification, is contained in the notion of graphoids. Every graph can be seen as an interpretation of a graphoid in a particular ‘coordinate system’, called a 2-complete basis. From this prospect, a graphoid is an essential, coordinate free, geometrical notion for which each associated graph, if it exists, is just a particular view of the same generality. The concept of a graphoid can also be seen as a pair of set systems (dual matroids) whose members are called circuits and cutsets. The set of all circuits (cutsets) together with all their distinct unions we call a circ (cut) space. In this chapter, in the context of circuits and cutsets, we concentrate on two concepts of independence within graphs and graphoids. We first introduce independent collections of circuits and cutsets and then we use this concept to define independent edge subsets, that is, circuit-less and cutset-less subsets. Prom this point on, we take circuits and cutsets as primary notions. This material may be seen as a bridge between traditional graph theory and matroid theory. We also give a brief overview of properties of graphoids and methods in topological analysis of networks.
The graphoidal point of view
The space of all graphs can be divided into disjoint classes such that two graphs belong to the same class if they are 2-isomorphic.
This research monograph is concerned with two dual structures in graphs. These structures, one based on the concept of a circuit and the other on the concept of a cutset are strongly interdependent and constitute a hybrid structure called a graphoid. This approach to graph theory dealing with graphoidal structures we call hybrid graph theory. A large proportion of our material is either new or is interpreted from a fresh viewpoint. Hybrid graph theory has particular relevance to the analysis of (lumped) systems of which we might take electrical networks as the archetype. Electrical network analysis was one of the earliest areas of application of graph theory and it was essentially out of developments in that area that hybrid graph theory evolved. The theory emphasises the duality of the circuit and cutset spaces and is essentially a vertex independent view of graphs. In this view, a circuit or a cutset is a subset of the edges of a graph without reference to the endpoints of the edges. This naturally leads to working in the domain of graphoids which are a generalisation of graphs. In fact, two graphs have the same graphoid if they are 2-isomorphic and this is equivalent to saying that both graphs (within a one-to-one correspondence of edges) have the same set of circuits and cutsets.
Historically, the study of hybrid aspects of graphs owes much to the foundational work of Japanese researchers dating from the late 1960's. Here we omit the names of individual researchers, but they may be readily identified through our bibliographic notes.
First two chapters could be seen as a bridge between traditional graph theory and the graphoidal perspective.
The concept of graph inherently includes two dual structures, one based on circuits and the other based on cutsets. These two structures are strongly interdependent. They constitute the so-called graphoidal structure which is a deep generalization of the concept of graph and comes from matroid theory. The main difference between graph and graphoid is that the latter requires no concept of vertex while the first presumes vertex as a primary notion. After some bridging material, our approach will be entirely vertex-independent. We shall concentrate on the hybrid aspects of graphs that naturally involve both dual structures. Because of this approach, the material of this text is located somewhere between graph theory and the theory of matroids. This enables us to combine the advantages of both an intuitive view of graphs and formal mathematical tools from matroid theory.
Starting with the classical definition of a graph in terms of vertices and edges we define circs and cuts and then circuits and cutsets. In this context, a circuit (respectively, cutset) is a minimal circ (cut) in the sense that no proper subset of it is also a circ (cut). We consider some collective algebraic properties and mutual relationships of circs and cuts. Vertex and edge-separators are introduced and through these we define various kinds of connectivity. The immediate thrust is towards a vertex-independent description of graphs, so that later all theorems and propositions will be vertex-independent.
The last two sections of the chapter are devoted to the notions of multiports and Kirchhoff's laws which are basic concepts in network analysis.
Many properties of pairs of trees of a graph are related to the Hamming distance between them. This is important for several graph-theoretical concepts that have featured in hybrid graph theory. Here the notions of perfect pairs and superperfect pairs of trees have played a part. We define and characterize these notions in this chapter and describe necessary conditions for the unique solvability of affine networks in terms of trees and pair of trees.
The small number of theorems and propositions collected together in the opening paragraphs of Chapter 3 will again be frequently referred to here. Familiarity with the basic concepts of graphs such as circuit and cutset are presumed in this chapter. A maximal circuit-less subset of a graph G is called a tree of G while a maximal cutset-less subset of edges is called a cotree. These terms (circuit, cutset, tree and cotree) will be used here to mean a subset of the edges of a graph. Let F be a subset of E. Then the rank of F, denoted by rank (F), is the cardinality of a maximum circuit-less subset of F and the corank of F, denoted by corank (F), is the cardinality of a maximum cutsetless subset of F. The complement of F is the set difference E\F, denoted by F*. By |F| we denote the number of elements in (that is, the cardinality of) the subset F.
Diameter of a tree
Given a graph G, each its tree t can be classified according to the non-negative integer rank(f).
In this chapter maximal edge subsets that are both circuit-less and cutsetless (which we call basoids) and the related concepts of principal minor and principal partition of a graph are considered. The fact that basoids may have different cardinalities provides a rich structure which is described through several propositions. Transitions from one basoid to another (which provides a basis for augmenting basoids in turn) and the concept of a minor of a graph with respect to a dyad (a maximum cardinality basoid) are also investigated in detail. It is shown that there exists a unique minimal minor with respect to every dyad of a graph G.This edge subset, called the principal minor and its dual called the principal cominor, define a partition of the edge set of Gcalled the principal partition. The hybrid rank of a graph is defined to be the cardinality of a dyad of the graph. This is a natural extension of the definitions of rank and corank of a graph, defined as the cardinalities of a maximum circuit-less subset and a maximum cutset-less subset of the graph, respectively. In the last section of this chapter an application to hybrid topological analysis of networks is considered. An algorithm for finding a maximum cardinality topologically complete set of network variables is also described.
The material of this chapter is general in the sense that it can be easily extended from graphs to matroids. To ensure this generality, the Painting Theorem, the matroidal version of the Orthogonality Theorem as well as the Circuit and the Cutset axioms are widely used to prove propositions.
We present some nice properties of the classical construction of triangle-free graphs with high chromatic number given by Blanche Descartes and its modifications. In particular, we construct colour-critical graphs and hypergraphs of high girth with moderate average degree.
Consider a finite alphabet Ω and strings consisting of elements from Ω. For a given string w, let cor(w) denote the autocorrelation, which can be seen as a measure of the amount of overlap in w. Furthermore, let aw(n) be the number of strings of length n that do not contain w as a substring. Eriksson [4] stated the following conjecture: if cor(w)>cor(w′), thenaw(n)>aw′(n) from the first n where equality no longer holds. We prove that this is true if [mid ]Ω[mid ][ges ]3, by giving a lower bound for aw(n)−aw′(n).
Let C(G) denote the number of simple cycles of a graph G and let C(n) be the maximum of C(G) over all planar graphs with n nodes. We present a lower bound on C(n), constructing graphs with at least 2.28n cycles. Applying some probabilistic arguments we prove an upper bound of 3.37n.
We also discuss this question restricted to the subclasses of grid graphs, bipartite graphs, and 3-colourable triangulated graphs.
We show that the Poisson–Dirichlet distribution is the distribution of points in a scale-invariant Poisson process, conditioned on the event that the sum T of the locations of the points in (0,1] is 1. This extends to a similar result, rescaling the locations by T, and conditioning on the event that T[les ]1. Restricting both processes to (0, β] for 0<β[les ]1, we give an explicit formula for the total variation distance between their distributions. Connections between various representations of the Poisson–Dirichlet process are discussed.
A graph G is m-choosable with impropriety d, or simply (m, d)*-choosable, if, for every list assignment L, where [mid ]L(v)[mid ][ges ]m for every v∈V(G), there exists an L-colouring of G such that each vertex of G has at most d neighbours coloured with the same colour as itself. We prove a Grötzsch-type theorem for list colourings with impropriety one, that is, the (3, 1)*-choosability for triangle-free planar graphs; in the proof the method of extending a precolouring of a 4- or 5-cycle is used.
We introduce the path resistance method for lower bounds on the smallest nontrivial eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix of a graph. The method is based on viewing the graph in terms of electrical circuits: it uses clique embeddings to produce lower bounds on λ2 and star embeddings to produce lower bounds on the smallest Rayleigh quotient when there is a zero Dirichlet boundary condition. The method assigns priorities to the paths in the embedding; we show that, for an unweighted tree T, using uniform priorities for a clique embedding produces a lower bound on λ2 that is off by at most an O(log diameter(T)) factor. We show that the best bounds this method can produce for clique embeddings are the same as for a related method that uses clique embeddings and edge lengths to produce bounds.
We consider the problem of determining the maximum number N(m, k, r) of columns of a 0−1 matrix with m rows and exactly r ones in each column such that every k columns are linearly independent over ℤ2. For fixed integers k[ges ]4 and r[ges ]2, where k is even and gcd(k−1, r) = 1, we prove the lower bound N(m, k, r) = Ω(mkr/2(k−1)·(ln m)1/k−1). This improves on earlier results from [14] by a factor Θ((ln m)1/k−1). Moreover, we describe a polynomial time algorithm achieving this new lower bound.
Let A be a subset of an abelian group G. The subset sum of A is the set [sum ](A) = {[sum ]x∈T[mid ]T⊂A}. We prove the following result. Let S be a generating subset of an abelian group G such that 0∉S and 14[les ][mid ]S[mid ]. Then one of the following conditions holds.
(ii) There is an x∈S such that S[setmn ]{x} generates a proper subgroup of order less than (3[mid ]S[mid ]−3)/2.
As a consequence, we obtain the following open case of an old conjecture of Diderrich. Let q be a composite odd number and let G be an abelian group of order 3q. Let S be a subset of G with cardinality q+1. Then every element of G is the sum of some subset of S.
Let [Fscr] be a family of forbidden k-hypergraphs (k-uniform set systems). An [Fscr]-saturated hypergraph is a maximal k-uniform set system not containing any member of [Fscr]. As the main result we prove that, for any finite family [Fscr], the minimum number of edges of an [Fscr]-saturated hypergraph is O(nk−1). In particular, this implies a conjecture of Tuza. Some other related results are presented.