To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Let be a class of structures for a first-order language and let n be a positive integer. A structure A for the language is said to be n-residually if, given elements a1, … an and b1, … bn of A with ai≠bi for 1 ≤i≤n, there exist B ∈ and an epimorphism φ:A → B such that φ(ai≠φ(bi for 1 ≤i ≤ n. We abbreviate 1 -residually to residually , and A is said to be fully residually if it is n-residually for all n ≤ 1. We shall only be using two cases. One is where the language is the first-order language of groups, {·−1,1}, and A and all members of are groups. In this case we may take all the bi in the definition to be equal to 1. However, we are mainly interested in the first-order language of rings, {+,−·,0,1}. Again if A and all members of are rings, we may take all bi to be zero in the definition.
Let p(n) be the usual partition function. Let l be an odd prime, and let r (mod t) be any arithmetic progression. If there exists an integer n ≡ r (mod t) such that p(n) ≢ 0 (mod l), then, for large X,
The paper shows that no origin-symmetric convex polyhedron in R3 is the intersection body of a star body. It is shown also that every originsymmetric convex body in Rd, for d = 3 and 4, can be seen as the intersection body of a star-shaped set whose radial function satisfies conditions related to suitable non-integer Sobolev classes.
Let B = [b1, …, bn] (with column vectors bi) be a basis of ℝn. Then L = [sum ]biℤ is a lattice in ℝn and A = B[top ]B is the Gram matrix of B. The reciprocal lattice L* of L has basis B* = (B−1)[top ] with Gram matrix A−1. For any nonsingular matrix A = (ai,j) with inverse A−1 = (a*i,j), let τ(A) = max1[les ]i[les ]n{[sum ]nj=1[mid ]ai,j·a*j,j[mid ]}. Then τ(A), τ(A−1)[ges ]1 holds, with equality for an orthogonal basis. We will show that for any lattice L there is a basis with Gram matrix A such that τ(A), τ(A−1) = exp (O((ln n)2)). This generalizes a result in [8] and [20].
For any basis transformation A→Ā with Ā = T[top ]AT, T = (ti,j)∈SLn(ℤ), we will show [mid ]ti,j[mid ][les ]τ(A−1)·τ(Ā). This implies that every integral matrix representation of a finite group is equivalent to a representation where the coefficients of the matrices representing group elements are bounded by exp (O((ln n)2)). This new bound is considerably smaller than the known (exponential) bounds for automorphisms of Minkowski-reduced lattice bases: see, for example, [6].
The quantities τ(A), τ(A−1) have the following geometric interpretation. Let V(L) [ratio ]= {x∈ℝn[mid ]∀λ∈L[ratio ][mid ]x[mid ][les ][mid ]x−λ[mid ]} be the Voronoi cell (also called the Dirichlet region) of the lattice L. For a basis B of L, we call C(B) = {[sum ]xibi, [mid ]xi[mid ][les ]1/2} the basis cell of B. Both cells define a lattice tiling of ℝn (see [6]); they coincide for an orthogonal basis. For a general basis B of L with Gram matrix A we will show V(L)[les ]τ(A−1)·C(B) and C(B)[les ]n·τ(A)·V(L).
The problem of probabilistic representability of semimatroids over a four-element set is solved. In this problem, one looks for all combinations of conditional independences within four random variables which can occur simultaneously. New properties of the stochastic conditional independences are deduced from conditional information inequalities. Examples of four-tuples of random variables are presented to show the probabilistic representability of three non-Ingleton semimatroids.
A graph G is m-choosable with impropriety d, or simply (m, d)*-choosable, if for every list assignment L, where [mid ]L(v)[mid ][ges ]m for every v∈V(G), there exists an L-colouring of G such that each vertex of G has at most d neighbours coloured with the same colour as itself. We show that every planar graph is (3, 2)*-choosable and every outerplanar graph is (2, 2)*-choosable. We also propose some interesting problems about this colouring.
In this paper we analyse the expected depth of random circuits of fixed fanin f. Such circuits are built a gate at a time, with the f inputs of each new gate being chosen randomly from among the previously added gates. The depth of the new gate is defined to be one more than the maximal depth of its input gates. We show that the expected depth of a random circuit with n gates is bounded from above by ef ln n and from below by 2.04 … f ln n.
We study the fluctuations, in the large deviations regime, of the longest increasing sub-sequence of a random i.i.d. sample on the unit square. In particular, our results yield the precise upper and lower exponential tails for the length of the longest increasing subsequence of a random permutation.
As a consequence of an early result of Pach we show that every maximal triangle-free graph is either homomorphic with a member of a specific infinite sequence of graphs or contains the Petersen graph minus one vertex as a subgraph. From this result and further structural observations we derive that, if a (not necessarily maximal) triangle-free graph of order n has minimum degree δ[ges ]n/3, then the graph is either homomorphic with a member of the indicated family or contains the Petersen graph with one edge contracted. As a corollary we get a recent result due to Chen, Jin and Koh. Finally, we show that every triangle-free graph with δ>n/3 is either homomorphic with C5 or contains the Möbius ladder. A major tool is the observation that every triangle-free graph with δ[ges ]n/3 has a unique maximal triangle-free supergraph.
A family of k sets is called a Δ-system if any two sets have the same intersection. Denote by f(r, k) the least integer so that any r-uniform family of f(r, k) sets contains a Δ-system consisting of k sets. We prove that, for every fixed r, f(r, k) = kr + o(kr). Using a recent result of Molloy and Reed [5], a bound on the error term is provided for sufficiently large k.
We prove a joint local limit law for the distribution of the r largest components of decomposable logarithmic combinatorial structures, including assemblies, multisets and selections. Our method is entirely probabilistic, and requires only weak conditions that may readily be verified in practice.
A tight upper bound on the number of elements in a connected matroid with fixed rank and largest cocircuit size is given. This upper bound is used to show that a connected matroid with at least thirteen elements contains either a circuit or a cocircuit with at least six elements. In the language of matroid Ramsey numbers, n(6, 6) = 13: this is the largest currently known matroid Ramsey number.
The theory of symmetric functions has many applications to enumerative combinatorics, as well as to such other branches of mathematics as group theory, Lie algebras, and algebraic geometry. Our aim in this chapter is to develop the basic combinatorial properties of symmetric functions; the connections with algebra will only be hinted at in Sections 7.18 and 7.24, Appendix 2, and in some exercises.
Let x = (x1, x2,…) be a set of indeterminates, and let n ∈ ℕ. A homogeneous symmetric function of degree n over a commutative ring R (with identity) is a formal power series
where (a) α ranges over all weak compositions α = (α1, α2, …) of n (of infinite length), (b) cα ∈ R, (c) xα stands for the monomial xα11, xα22,… and (d) f (xω(1)xω(2), …) = f (x1, x2,…) for every permutation ω of the positive integers ℙ. (A symmetric function of degree 0 is just an element of R.) Note that the term “symmetric function” is something of a misnomer; f(x) is not regarded as a function but rather as a formal power series. Nevertheless, for historical reasons we adhere to the above terminology.
The set of all homogeneous symmetric functions of degree n over R is denoted ΛnR. Clearly if f, g ∈ ΛnR and a, b ∈ R, then a f + b g ∈ ΛnR in other words, ΛnR is an R-module. For our purposes it will suffice to take R = ℚ (or sometimes ℚ with some indeterminates adjoined), so Λnℚ is a ℚ-vector space.
In this chapter we will investigate two classes of generating functions called algebraic and D-finite generating functions. We will also briefly discuss the theory of noncommutative generating functions, especially their connection with rational and algebraic generating functions. The algebraic functions are a natural generalization of rational functions, while D-flnite functions are a natural generalization of algebraic functions. Thus we have the hierarchy
Various other classes could be added to the hierarchy, but the three classes of (6.1) seem the most useful for enumerative combinatorics.
Definition. Let K be a field. A formal power series η ∈ K [[x]] is said to be algebraic if there exist polynomials P0(x),…, Pd(x) ∈ K[x], not all 0, such that
The smallest positive integer d for which (6.2) holds is called the degree of η.
Note that an algebraic series η has degree one if and only if η is rational. The set of all algebraic power series over K is denoted Kalg[[x]].
Example. Letη = ∑n≥0x n. By Exercise 1.4(a) wehave(l-4x)η2 - 1 = 0. Hence η is algebraic of degree one or two. If K has characteristic 2 then η = 1, which has degree one. Otherwise it is easy to see that η has degree two. Namely, if deg(η) = 1 then η = P(x)/Q(x) for some polynomials P(x), Q(x) ∈ K[x]. Thus
The degree (as a polynomial) of the left-hand side is odd while that of the right-hand side is even, a contradiction.