To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A few additions, which did not change the structure and level of presentation, have been included in the preparation of this English translation. Chapter 1 is supplemented by Section 1.8. In Chapter 2 insertions have been added to Subsection 2.1.3; this chapter is supplemented by Subsection 2.2.4 and Section 2.7; Section 2.6 is supplemented by Subsections 2.6.2 and 2.6.6. In Chapter 3, Sections 3.1, 3.3 and 3.6 are supplemented, and a new section, Section 3.4, is introduced. In Chapter 5, Subsection 5.2.6, item (g) in Section 5.4 and Section 5.9 have been added. Subsection 6.1.3 has been added to Chapter 6. In the main, the option of using certain parts of the book as a textbook, as well as the independence of the chapters, is preserved.
After the Russian edition of the book had appeared, a number of significant monographs on combinatorics and closely related problems were published. These books and some papers have been included in the Bibliography.
I am grateful to Professor B. Bollobás for his kind suggestion to Cambridge University Press to publish this book in English, and to Professor V. F. Kolchin for useful discussions during the translation.
This book is addressed to those who are interested in combinatorial methods of discrete mathematics and their applications. A major part of the book can be used as a textbook on combinatorial analysis for students specializing in mathematics. The remaining part is suitable for use in special lectures and seminars for the advanced study of combinatorics. Those parts which are not intended for teaching include Sections 2.3, 3.6, 3.7, 5.3, 5.6, 5.8, 6.3, 6.4 and Subsection 5.1.3 where the material contains either special questions concerning applications of combinatorial methods or rather cumbersome derivations of asymptotic formulae. Of course, a course of studies in discrete mathematics can be biased towards asymptotic methods, where the selection of material can be different and where the above-mentioned sections become basic.
Some knowledge of algebra and set theory, summarized in Section 1.1, is assumed. To understand the derivations of asymptotic formulae, the reader must be familiar with those results of complex analysis usually included in standard courses for students specializing in mathematics.
For the convenience of those readers who are interested in the separate questions contained in the book, I have attempted to make the presentation of each chapter self-contained and, for the most part, independent of the other chapters.
As is usual, I acknowledge those authors whose results are presented in the book and provide the corresponding citation. The list of references is given at the end of the book.
The method of citation is unified. Citations of theorems, lemmas, corollaries, formulae, etc., include the chapter number, section number and own number within the section. For example, Theorem 1.2.3 is theorem number 3 in Section 2 of Chapter 1.
The generating functions considered in this chapter are important instruments for solving the so-called enumerative problems in combinatorial analysis. Enumerative problems arise if we need to be explicit about the number of ways of choosing particular elements from a finite set. The application of generating functions in this situation consists of establishing a correspondence between the elements of the set and the terms of the products of some series; the solution of enumerative problems is reduced, in fact, to finding a suitable method for the multiplication of these series. Under these conditions, the convergence of the series is not necessary, and it is natural to use a formal power series, assuming that the operations on them are properly defined. The formal power series, generally speaking, of several variables, are called the generating functions.
Note that the application of generating functions to the solution of enumerative problems connected with establishing a correspondence between the elements of a set and the terms of formal series is an intermediate problem of combinatorial analysis. To solve the main problem (consisting of the derivation of expressions for the number of elements in a set depending on the parameters determining this set) it is appropriate to consider the corresponding power series as convergent in some domain of variation of a real or complex variable. Inside such domains the power series determine analytic functions whose properties are well known in classical analysis. We do not introduce a new terminology for the analytic functions applied to the solution of enumerative problems, but, rather, we call them the generating functions also.
The first section of this chapter is of an introductory nature and presents a summary of the main notions and results from the set theory and algebra which will be used in the book. In the sections that follow we consider various combinatorial configurations which may be introduced on the basis of the general notion of a configuration given in terms of mappings of sets. As examples of combinatorial configurations we consider Latin squares, orthogonal Latin squares, block designs and finite projective planes.
Notions of set theory and algebra
Boolean operations on sets
A set is a collection of elements of abstract nature, objects or notions, united by some common property. Along with the word “set” we sometimes use equivalent words such as “collection”, “family”, etc. A set consists of elements, and the formula x ∈ X means that the element x belongs to the set X; otherwise we write x ∉ X. If for each x ∈ X the inclusion x ∈ Y holds, then we say that X is a subset of Y and write X ⊆ Y. Sets X and Y are equal if X ⊆ y and Y ⊆ X. We say that a set X is a proper subset of Y and write X ⊂ Y if X ⊆ y and X ≠ Y. Any set contains, as a subset, the empty set denoted by ø.
A wide range of the so-called combinatorial problems of choice can be reduced to finding a system of distinct representatives for a given family of subsets of a set. In what follows, such a system will be called a transversal. We prefer this term because it is short and so has an advantage over the corresponding, more detailed, conventional term. The main questions considered in this chapter are related to the existence and number of transversals. The basis for the answers to the first series of questions is an existence theorem due to P. Hall, and various applications of it. To determine the number of transversals, a notion of a permanent is used which is a modification of the well-known notion of a determinant playing an important role in algebra.
The theorem of P. Hall is the basis for the proofs of the theorem of M. Hall on the existence of Latin squares and rectangles and Birkhoff's theorem on the representation of a stochastic matrix as a weighted sum of permutation matrices. Birkhoff's theorem is connected with a number of assertions about the decomposition of probabilistic automata and Markov chains with doubly stochastic matrices of transition probabilities.
Transversals
The main theorems
Let X be an arbitrary, generally speaking, infinite set; let X1, …, Xn be a family of subsets of X containing, in general, infinite subsets. Note that the equalities Xi = Xj for i ≠ j are allowed. We denote this family by (Xi: i ∈ I), where I = {1, …, n}.
The starting point for the present paper is the following question, which asks whether points can be replaced by flats (translates of linear subspaces of arbitrary dimension) as the basic objects in a convexity structure on ℝd.
In Section 1 of this note we will construct an example of a subset of R × Rn such that the parabolic capacity with respect to the heat equation is zero although its orthogonal projection onto {0} × Rn is the whole space. Such examples were already given by R. Kaufman and J.-M. Wu in [5] and [6]. However, our probabilistic approach seems to be more transparent since it does not depend on explicit formulas for Green functions.
where φ is the notation used by Ramanujan in his notebooks [15], and is the familiar notation of Whittaker and Watson [20, p. 464]. It is well known that [1, p. 102] (with a misprint corrected)
where denotes the ordinary or Gaussian hypergeometric function; k, 0 < k < 1, is the modulus; K is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind; and
where K′=K(k′) and is the complementary modulus. Thus, an evaluation of any one of the functions φ, , or K yields an evaluation of the other two functions. However, such evaluations may not be very explicit. For example, if K(k) is known for a certain value of k, it may be difficult or impossible to explicitly determine K′, and so q cannot be explicitly determined. Conversely, it may be possible to evaluate φ(q) for a certain value of q, but it may be impossible to determine the corresponding value of k. (Recall that [1, p. 102].)
For a sequence of polynomials (Pn) orthonormal on the interval [−1, 1], we consider the sequence of transforms (gn) of the series given by . We establish necessary and sufficient conditions on the matrix (bnk) for the sequence (gn) to converge uniformly on compact subsets of the interior of an appropriate ellipse to a function holomorphic on that interior.
For finite coverings in euclidean d-space Ed we introduce a parametric density function. Here the parameter controls the influence of the boundary of the covered region to the density. This definition gives a new approach to covering which is similar to the approach for packing in [BHW1], [BHW2]. In this way we obtain a unified theory for finite and infinite covering and generalize similar results, which were developed by various authors since 1950 for d=2, to all dimensions.
Let Δ = {z:|Z|<1}, Γ={z:|z|=1}, and ℳ denote the set of complex-valued Borel measures on Γ. Let Kα(z)=(1−z)−α for α>0 and K0(z)=log 1/(1−z). For α > 0 let ℱα denote the family of functions f on Δ having the property that there exists a measure μ∈ℳ such that
for |z|<1. When α=0, this condition is replaced by
The dynamics of cluster growth can be modelled by the following infinite system of ordinary differential equations, first proposed by Smoluchowski, [8],
where cj=cj(t) represents the physical concentration of j-clusters (aggregates of j identical particles), aj,k=aj,k≥0 are the time-independent coagulation coefficients, measuring the effectiveness of the coagulation process between a j-cluster and a k-cluster, and the first sum in the right-hand side of (1) is defined to be zero if j = 1.
In the paper [2] Hsia noted that the forms x2+xy+y2+9z2 and x2+3y2+3yz+3z2 constitute a genus and that both forms are regular; he asked whether there exist any other genera containing two or more regular forms. In this note it is proved that the forms
are regular. They constitute a genus with discriminant 27 (in the normalization used by Brandt and Intrau in [1]). It is noteworthy that Hsia's genus has the same discriminant.
For arbitrary f: R → R and ϒ ⊂ Z × R we define the set of quantized observations of f relative to ϒ as follows: for each integer n and each y∈R we write
(the supremum of an empty set is taken to be −∞ ) and we put
Thus for example and , where [x] (without subscript) denotes as usual the integer part of x.
One of the most beautiful and important results in geometric convexity is Hadwiger's characterization theorem for the quermassintegrals. Hadwiger's theorem classifies all continuous rigid motion invariant valuations on convex bodies as consisting of the linear span of the quermassintegrals (or, equivalently, of the intrinsic volumes) [4]. Hadwiger's characterization leads to effortless proofs of numerous results in integral geometry, including various kinematic formulas [7, 9] and the mean projection formulas for convex bodies [10]. Hadwiger's result also provides a connection between rigid motion invariant set functions and symmetric polynomials [1, 7].
A double elastic panel, set in a light compressible fluid, is excited by a time harmonic force applied along a line on one of the plates. The double panel consists of two parallel elastic plates, with different elastic properties, each of width a and separated by distance d≪a, set in rigid plane baffles with acoustically soft adjoining side walls. Each plate is taken to have infinite extent in the z-direction, so that the problem treated is a two-dimensional one. The radiated acoustic power is estimated asymptotically, averaged over a small frequency band and over all line force positions, for frequencies that are sufficiently high to ensure the excitation of many panel modes, with ka≫1 and kd >> 1, where k is the acoustic wave number. Transition formulae are given for frequencies ω that are near to either of the coincidence frequencies, ω1 and ω2, of the individual panels.
We prove a generalization of a theorem of Ryshkov relating the Voronoï vectors of lattices to the defining conditions for the Minkowski fundamental domain . This is then used to prove that a Minkowski reduced basis of a lattice of dimension n < 7 consists of strict Voronoï vectors.