To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Given the description of a quantum state in terms of Hilbert space vectors, physical magnitudes (Heisenberg’s matrices) correspond to linear operators on the Hilbert space. A linear operator (or simply, operator) is a linear map of a Hilbert space to itself.
Science is distinguished from other endeavors by the scientific method, which starts with curiosity and leads sequentially from hypothesis to experimental testing to hypothesis revision, and finally, to knowledge. This chapter traces the development of the scientific method from ancient Egypt, Greece, the Islamic world, Europe (beginning in the Middle Ages), and the modern world (eighteenth to twenty-first century). It shows how the method became increasingly rigorous and precise through codification of its practice and the use of statistics in data analysis. The contributions of philosophy to the method and its possible senescence, in the light of data-driven science, also are discussed.
In this chapter we introduce the clustering problem and use it to motivate mixture models. We start by describing clustering in a frequentist paradigm and introduce the relevant likelihoods and latent variables. We then discuss properties of the likelihoods including invariance with respect to label swapping. Finally, we expand this discussion to describe clustering and mixture models more generally within a Bayesian paradigm. This allows us to introduce Dirichlet priors used in inferring the weight we ascribe to each cluster component from which the data are drawn. Finally, we describe the infinite mixture model and Dirichlet process priors within the Bayesian nonparametric paradigm, appropriate for the analysis of uncharacterized data that may contain an unspecified number of clusters.
In this chapter we present dynamical systems and their probabilistic description. We distinguish between system descriptions with discrete and continuous state-spaces as well as discrete and continuous time. We formulate examples of statistical models including Markov models, Markov jump processes, and stochastic differential equations. In doing so, we describe fundamental equations governing the evolution of the probability of dynamical systems. These equations include the master equation, Langevin equation, and Fokker–Plank equation. We also present sampling methods to simulate realizations of a stochastic dynamical process such as the Gillespie algorithm. We end with case studies relevant to chemistry and physics.
This chapter extends DMRG from real space to an arbitrary basis space in which each basis state, such as a momentum eigenstate or a molecular orbital, serves as an effective lattice site. Unlike in real space, the interaction potentials become nonlocal and off-diagonal in an arbitrary basis representation. To solve this nonlocal problem, one should optimize the order of basis states and introduce the so-called complementary operators to minimize the number of operators whose matrix elements must be computed and stored. We illustrate the momentum-space DMRG using the Hubbard model and discuss its application in other interacting fermion models. Finally, we introduce a DMRG scheme for optimizing the single-particle basis states and their order simultaneously in a more general basis space without momentum conservation.
Free energy, widely used as a measure of turbulence intensity in weakly collisional plasmas, has been recently found to be a suitable basis to describe both linear and nonlinear growth in a wide class gyrokinetic systems. The simplicity afforded by this approach is accompanied by some drawbacks, notably the lack of any explicit treatment of wave–particle effects, which makes the theory unable to describe things like stability thresholds or dependence on the geometry of the background magnetic field. As a step toward overcoming these limitations, we propose an extension of the theory based on a generalization of the free energy. With this, it is demonstrated that resonance effects are recovered, and the bounds on growth are significantly reduced. The simplicity and efficient computation of the associated ‘optimal’ growth rates makes the theory potentially applicable to stellarator optimization.