Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-ncjtf Total loading time: 0.587 Render date: 2021-05-17T10:10:35.228Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Integrating models of cognition and culture will require a bit more math

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

Matthew R. Zefferman
Affiliation:
Department of Defense Analysis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA93943mrzeffer@nps.edu https://www.zefferman.com
Paul E. Smaldino
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA95343. psmaldino@ucmerced.edu http://smaldino.com/
Corresponding

Abstract

We support the goal to integrate models of culture and cognition. However, we are not convinced that the free energy principle and Thinking Through Other Minds will be useful in achieving it. There are long traditions of modeling both cultural evolution and cognition. Demonstrating that FEP or TTOM can integrate these models will require a bit more math.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2013) A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kallens PA, Contreras, Dale, R. & Smaldino, P. E. (2018) Cultural evolution of categorization. Cognitive Systems Research 52:765774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S. A. (1995) George Price's contributions to evolutionary genetics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 175(3):373–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J. & McElreath, R. (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 12(3):123135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018b) Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., Lazer, D., Redish, A. D., Couzin, I. D. & Cognitive Search Research Group (2015) Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(1):4654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElreath, R. & Henrich, J. (2007) Modeling cultural evolution. In Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology, eds. Dunbar, R. I. M. & Barrett, L., pp. 571586. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perreault, C., Moya, C. & Boyd, R. (2012) A Bayesian approach to the evolution of social learning. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(5):449459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendell, L., Boyd, R., Cownden, D., Enquist, M., Eriksson, K., Feldman, M. W., Fogarty, L., Ghirlanda, S., Lillicrap, T. & Laland, K. N. (2010) Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tournament. Science 328(5975):208213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rendell, L., Fogarty, L., Hoppitt, W. J., Morgan, T. J., Webster, M. M. & Laland, K. N. (2011) Cognitive culture: Theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(2):6876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., Mathew, S., Newton, E. K., Naar, N., Newson, L., Ross, C., Smaldino, P. E., Waring, T. M. & Zefferman, M. (2016) Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:e30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smaldino, P. E. (2019) Social identity and cooperation in cultural evolution. Behavioural Processes 161:108116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smaldino, P. E. & Epstein, J. M. (2015) Social conformity despite individual preferences for distinctiveness. Royal Society Open Science 2(3):140437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smaldino, P. E. & Spivey, M. J. (2019) Mills made of grist, and other interesting ideas in need of clarification [commentary on C. Heyes]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42:e182e182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, T. M., Goff, S. H. & Smaldino, P. E. (2017) The coevolution of economic institutions and sustainable consumption via cultural group selection. Ecological Economics 131:524532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zefferman, M. R. (2016) Mothers teach daughters because daughters teach granddaughters: The evolution of sex-biased transmission. Behavioral Ecology 27(4):11721181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zefferman, M. R. & Mathew, S. (2015) An evolutionary theory of large-scale human warfare: Group-structured cultural selection. Evolutionary Anthropology 24(2):5061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Integrating models of cognition and culture will require a bit more math
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Integrating models of cognition and culture will require a bit more math
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Integrating models of cognition and culture will require a bit more math
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *