Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T04:55:57.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choosing a Markov blanket

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

Thomas Parr Open the ORCID record for Thomas Parr [Opens in a new window]
Thomas Parr*
Affiliation:
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, LondonWC1N 3AR, UK. thomas.parr.12@ucl.ac.uk https://tejparr.github.io/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary focuses upon the relationship between two themes in the target article: the ways in which a Markov blanket may be defined and the role of precision and salience in mediating the interactions between what is internal and external to a system. These each rest upon the different perspectives we might take while “choosing” a Markov blanket.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e112
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Clark, A. (2017a) A nice surprise? Predictive processing and the active pursuit of novelty. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17(3):521–34. doi:10.1007/s11097-017-9525-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desimone, R. (1996) Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93(24):13494–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. (2019) A free energy principle for a particular physics. arXiv e-prints, 1–148. Retrieved from https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190610184F.Google Scholar
Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K. & Luck, S. J. (1998) Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 353(1373):1257–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hohwy, J. (2016) The self-evidencing brain. Noûs 50(2):259–85. doi:10.1111/nous.12062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, M., Parr, T., Palacios, E., Friston, K. & Kiverstein, J. (2018) The Markov blankets of life: Autonomy, active inference and the free energy principle. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 15(138):1–11. 20170792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindley, D. V. (1956) On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27(4):986–1005. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirza, M. B., Adams, R. A., Mathys, C. D. & Friston, K. J. (2016) Scene construction, visual foraging, and active inference. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 10(56):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palacios, E. R., Isomura, T., Parr, T. & Friston, K. (2019) The emergence of synchrony in networks of mutually inferring neurons. Scientific Reports 9(1):6412. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42821-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parr, T., Da Costa, L. & Friston, K. (2020) Markov blankets, information geometry and stochastic thermodynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 378:1–13. doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0159.Google ScholarPubMed
Parr, T. & Friston, K. J. (2019) Attention or salience? Current Opinion in Psychology 29:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearl, J. (1998) Graphical models for probabilistic and causal reasoning. In: Quantified representation of uncertainty and imprecision, ed. Smets, P., pp. 367–89. Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I. & Umiltá, C. (1987) Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25(1, Part 1):31–40. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipp, S. (2016) Neural elements for predictive coding. Frontiers in Psychology 7:1792. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed