Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6c7dr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T15:43:42.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unification at the cost of realism and precision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

Rachael L. Brown
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, the Australian National University, Canberra, 0200ACT, Australia. rachael.brown@anu.edu.au ross.pain@anu.edu.au http://rachaelbrown.net
Carl Brusse
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, the Australian National University, Canberra, 0200ACT, Australia. rachael.brown@anu.edu.au ross.pain@anu.edu.au http://rachaelbrown.net Department of Philosophy and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia. carl.brusse@sydney.edu.au
Bryce Huebner
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC20009. bryce.huebner@georgetown.edu brycehuebner.weebly.com
Ross Pain
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, the Australian National University, Canberra, 0200ACT, Australia. rachael.brown@anu.edu.au ross.pain@anu.edu.au http://rachaelbrown.net

Abstract

Veissière et al. must sacrifice explanatory realism and precision in order to develop a unified formal model. Drawing on examples from cognitive archeology, we argue that this makes it difficult for them to derive the kinds of testable predictions that would allow them to resolve debates over the nature of human social cognition and cultural acquisition.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable