Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T18:50:52.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community-engaged research is best positioned to catalyze systemic change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

Holly Caggiano Open the ORCID record for Holly Caggiano [Opens in a new window] ,
Sara M. Constantino Open the ORCID record for Sara M. Constantino [Opens in a new window] ,
Jeffrey Lees Open the ORCID record for Jeffrey Lees [Opens in a new window] ,
Rohini Majumdar Open the ORCID record for Rohini Majumdar [Opens in a new window]  and
Elke U. Weber Open the ORCID record for Elke U. Weber [Opens in a new window]
Holly Caggiano
Affiliation:
Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA holly.caggiano@princeton.edu jeff.lees@princeton.edu rohinim@princeton.edu eweber@princeton.edu
Sara M. Constantino
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA s.constantino@northeastern.edu School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
Jeffrey Lees
Affiliation:
Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA holly.caggiano@princeton.edu jeff.lees@princeton.edu rohinim@princeton.edu eweber@princeton.edu
Rohini Majumdar
Affiliation:
Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA holly.caggiano@princeton.edu jeff.lees@princeton.edu rohinim@princeton.edu eweber@princeton.edu
Elke U. Weber
Affiliation:
Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA holly.caggiano@princeton.edu jeff.lees@princeton.edu rohinim@princeton.edu eweber@princeton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Addressing many social challenges requires both structural and behavioral change. The binary of an i- and s-frame obscures how behavioral science can help foster bottom-up collective action. Adopting a community-frame perspective moves toward a more integrative view of how social change emerges, and how it might be promoted by policymakers and publics in service of addressing challenges like climate change.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e152
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamic, L. (1931). Dynamite: The story of class violence in America. ISCI.Google Scholar
Aron, A. (2022). The climate crisis: Science, impacts, policy, psychology, justice, social movements (pp. 253–288). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108982566.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulle, R. J. (2018). The climate lobby: A sectoral analysis of lobbying spending on climate change in the USA, 2000 to 2016. Climatic Change, 149(3–4), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2241-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centola, D. (2021). Change: The surprising science of how new ideas, behaviors, and innovations take off and take hold. Little, Brown Spark.Google Scholar
Ciplet, D. (2022). Transition coalitions: Toward a theory of transformative just transitions. Environmental Sociology, 8(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2031512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantino, S. M., Sparkman, G., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., Shell-Duncan, B., … Weber, E. U. (2022). Scaling up change: A critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 23(2), 50–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006221105279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2019). Deliberative democracy and climate governance. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(5), 411–413. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0591-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IPCC. (2022). Summary for policymakers. In Shukla, P. R., Skea, J., Slade, R., Khourdajie, A. A., van Diemen, R., McCollum, D., Pathak, M., Some, S., Vyas, P., Fradera, R., Belkacemi, M., Hasija, A., Lisboa, G., Luz, S., & Malley, J. (Eds.), Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1–48). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.001Google Scholar
Kaaronen, R. O., & Strelkovskii, N. (2020). Cultural evolution of sustainable behaviors: Pro-environmental tipping points in an agent-based model. One Earth, 2(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, B. (2014). Social class myopia: The case of psychology and labor unions. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyborg, K., Anderies, J. M., Dannenberg, A., Lindahl, T., Schill, C., Schlüter, M., … de Zeeuw, A. (2016). Social norms as solutions. Science (New York, N.Y.), 354(6308), 42–43. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H. (2006). Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103(51), 19224–19231. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607962103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otto, I. M., Donges, J. F., Cremades, R., Bhowmik, A., Hewitt, R. J., Lucht, W., … Schellnhuber, H. J. (2020). Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing earth's climate by 2050. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 117(5), 2354–2365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900577117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rome, A. (2013). The genius of earth day: How a 1970 teach-in unexpectedly made the first green generation. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Roos, P., Gelfand, M., Nau, D., & Lun, J. (2015). Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sass, S. A. (1997). The promise of private pensions. Harvard.Google Scholar
Stokes, L. C. (2016). Electoral backlash against climate policy: A natural experiment on retrospective voting and local resistance to public policy. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 958–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiri, M. A., Villamayor-Tomás, S., Scheidel, A., & Demaria, F. (2022). How social movements contribute to staying within the global carbon budget: Evidence from a qualitative meta-analysis of case studies. Ecological Economics, 195, 107356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. M. (2014). Counting carbon: The politics of carbon footprints and climate governance from the individual to the global. Global Environmental Politics, 14(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, R., Curato, N., & Smith, G. (2022). Deliberative democracy and the climate crisis. WIREs Climate Change, 13(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.759CrossRefGoogle Scholar