Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-bzm8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T05:15:24.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Don't throw the individual perspective out while waiting for systemic change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

Elizabeth S. Collier
Affiliation:
Division of Bioeconomy and Health, Material and Surface Design, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden elizabeth.collier@ri.se kathryn.harris@ri.se Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden marcus.bendtsen@liu.se; www.marcusbendtsen.com
Kathryn L. Harris
Affiliation:
Division of Bioeconomy and Health, Material and Surface Design, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden elizabeth.collier@ri.se kathryn.harris@ri.se
Michael Jecks
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, UK mejecks@outlook.com
Marcus Bendtsen
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden marcus.bendtsen@liu.se; www.marcusbendtsen.com

Abstract

Although it is clear that i-frame approaches cannot stand alone, the impact of s-frame changes can plateau. Combinations of these approaches may best reflect what we know about behavior and how to support behavioral change. Interactions between i-frame and s-frame thinking are explored here using two examples: alcohol consumption and meat consumption.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable