Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:32:02.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Don't throw the individual perspective out while waiting for systemic change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

Elizabeth S. Collier Open the ORCID record for Elizabeth S. Collier [Opens in a new window] ,
Kathryn L. Harris Open the ORCID record for Kathryn L. Harris [Opens in a new window] ,
Michael Jecks  and
Marcus Bendtsen Open the ORCID record for Marcus Bendtsen [Opens in a new window]
Elizabeth S. Collier
Affiliation:
Division of Bioeconomy and Health, Material and Surface Design, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden elizabeth.collier@ri.se kathryn.harris@ri.se Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden marcus.bendtsen@liu.se; www.marcusbendtsen.com
Kathryn L. Harris
Affiliation:
Division of Bioeconomy and Health, Material and Surface Design, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden elizabeth.collier@ri.se kathryn.harris@ri.se
Michael Jecks
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, UK mejecks@outlook.com
Marcus Bendtsen
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden marcus.bendtsen@liu.se; www.marcusbendtsen.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although it is clear that i-frame approaches cannot stand alone, the impact of s-frame changes can plateau. Combinations of these approaches may best reflect what we know about behavior and how to support behavioral change. Interactions between i-frame and s-frame thinking are explored here using two examples: alcohol consumption and meat consumption.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e154
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collier, E. S., Normann, A., Harris, K. L., Oberrauter, L.-M., & Bergman, P. (2022). Making more sustainable food choices one meal at a time: Psychological and practical aspects of meat reduction and substitution. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 11(9), 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091182Google Scholar
Guttormsson, U. (2022). CAN RAPPORT 213: Självrapporterade alkoholvanor i Sverige 2004–2021. Centralförbundet för alkohol- och narkotikaupplysning.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., Angus, C., Boyd, J., Buykx, P., Brennan, A., Gardiner, K., … Yannoulis, Y. (2022). Evaluating the impact of minimum unit pricing in Scotland on people who are drinking at harmful levels. June 7. Retrieved from https://www.publichealthscotland.scot/media/13486/evaluating-the-impact-of-minimum-unit-pricing-in-scotland-on-people-who-are-drinking-at-harmful-levels-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Källmén, H., Wennberg, P., Leifman, H., Bergman, H., & Berman, A. H. (2011). Alcohol habits in Sweden during 1997–2009 with particular focus on 2005 and 2009, assessed with the AUDIT: A repeated cross-sectional study. European Addiction Research, 17(2), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Säll, S., & Gren, M. (2015). Effects of an environmental tax on meat and dairy consumption in Sweden. Food Policy, 55, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2022). Konsumtion av kött. May 16. Retrieved from https://jordbruksverket.se/mat-och-drycker/hallbar-produktion-och-konsumtion-av-mat/konsumtion-av-kottGoogle Scholar
Swedish Government Prop. (2017). Prop 2016/17:104: En livsmedelstrategi för Sverige – fler jobb och hållbar tillväxt i hela landet. January 30. Retrieved from https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/proposition/2017/01/prop.-201617104/Google Scholar
Törrönen, J., Roumeliotis, F., Samuelsson, E., Kraus, L., & Room, R. (2019). Why are young people drinking less than earlier? Identifying and specifying social mechanisms with a pragmatist approach. International Journal of Drug Policy, 64, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S., Wang, J., Zhao, S., & Yang, S. (2019). Information publicity and resident's waste separation behavior: An empirical study based on the norm activation model. Waste Management, 87, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, S. K., Ballantine, P. W., & Ozanne, L. K. (2022). Consumer adoption of plant-based meat substitutes: A network of social practices. Appetite, 175, 106037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed