Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T12:30:01.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The human fear paradox turns out to be less paradoxical when global changes in human aggression and language evolution are considered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2023

Antonio Benítez-Burraco
Affiliation:
Department of Spanish, Linguistics, and Theory of Literature (Linguistics), Faculty of Philology, University of Seville, Seville 41004, Spain abenitez8@us.es http://antoniobenitez.wix.com/benitez-burraco
Ljiljana Progovac
Affiliation:
Department of English (Linguistics), College of Liberal Arts & Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA

Abstract

Our commentary focuses on the interaction between Grossmann's fearful ape hypothesis (FAH) and the human self-domestication hypothesis (HSDH), also taking into account language acquisition and evolution. Although there is considerable overlap between the two hypotheses, there are also some discrepancies, and our goal is to consider the extent to which HSDH can explain the phenomena identified by FAH without invoking fearfulness as directly adaptive.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benítez-Burraco, A., & Progovac, L. (2020). A four-stage model for language evolution under the effects of human self-domestication. Language & Communication, 73, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogins, B. (1999). Evolutionary perspectives on human growth. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 109153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieri, R. L., Churchill, S. E., Franciscus, R. G., Tan, J., & Hare, B. (2014). Craniofacial feminization, social tolerance, and the origins of behavioral modernity. Current Anthropology, 55(4), 419443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/677209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, B. T., & Kushnick, G. (2018). Female status, food security, and stature sexual dimorphism: Testing mate choice as a mechanism in human self-domestication. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 167(3), 458469. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gowlett, J. A. J. (2018). Kinship (early human), the archaeological evidence for. In Callan, H. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2343Google Scholar
Hare, B. (2017). Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 155186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, B., Wobber, V., & Wrangham, R. (2012). The self-domestication hypothesis: Evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression. Animal Behavior, 83(3), 573585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, B., & Woods, V. (2020). Survival of the friendliest: Understanding our origins and rediscovering our common humanity. Random House.Google Scholar
Herrmann, E., Hare, B., Cissewski, J., & Tomasello, M. (2011). A comparison of temperament in nonhuman apes and human infants. Developmental Science, 14(6), 13931405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilton, M., Twomey, K. E., & Westermann, G. (2019). Taking their eye off the ball: How shyness affects children's attention during word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 183, 134145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilton, M., & Westermann, G. (2017). The effect of shyness on children's formation and retention of novel word–object mappings. Journal of Child Language, 44(6), 13941412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komiyama, T., Iwama, H., Osada, N., Nakamura, Y., Kobayashi, H., Tateno, Y., & Gojobori, T. (2014). Dopamine receptor genes and evolutionary differentiation in the domestication of fighting cocks and long-crowing chickens. PLoS One, 9(7), e101778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101778CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manson, J. H., Chua, K. J., Rodriguez, N. N., Barlev, M., Durkee, P. K., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2022). Sex differences in fearful personality traits are mediated by physical strength. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221094086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, C. P., & Anderson, E. R. (2009). Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 496505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.05.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikolsky, A., & Benítez-Burraco, A. (2022). Human aggression and music evolution: A model. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a8up7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L., & Benítez-Burraco, A. (2019). From physical aggression to verbal behavior: Language evolution and self-domestication feedback loop. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raaska, H., Lapinleimu, H., Sinkkonen, J., Salmivalli, C., Matomäki, J., Mäkipää, S., & Elovainio, M. (2012). Experiences of school bullying among internationally adopted children: Results from the Finnish Adoption (FINADO) study. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 43(4), 592611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, D. X., Rafati, N., Ring, H., Younis, S., Feng, C., Blanco-Aguiar, J. A., … Andersson, L. (2020). Brain transcriptomics of wild and domestic rabbits suggests that changes in dopamine signalling and ciliary function contributed to evolution of tameness. Genome Biology and Evolution, 12(10), 19181928. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, J., & Kirby, S. (2018). Self domestication and the evolution of language. Biological Philosophy, 33, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeder, M. A. (2012). The domestication of animals. Journal of Anthropological Research, 68(2), 161190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar