Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T15:32:00.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fearfulness: An important addition to the starter kit for distinctively human minds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2023

Dominic M. Dwyer Open the ORCID record for Dominic M. Dwyer [Opens in a new window]  and
Cecilia Heyes Open the ORCID record for Cecilia Heyes [Opens in a new window]
Dominic M. Dwyer
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK DwyerDM@cardiff.ac.uk; https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/people/view/356849-dwyer-dominic
Cecilia Heyes
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, All Souls College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4AL, UK cecilia.heyes@all-souls.ox.ac.uk; https://users.ox.ac.uk/~ascch/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Grossmann's impressive article indicates that – along with attentional biases, expansion of domain-general processes of learning and memory, and other temperamental tweaks – heightened fearfulness is part of the genetic starter kit for distinctively human minds. The learned matching account of emotional contagion explains how heightened fearfulness could have promoted the development of caring and cooperation in our species.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e62
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 337–339. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Waal, F. B. M., & Preston, S. D. (2017). Mammalian empathy: Behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(8), 498–509. doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, U. (2001). Mind blindness and the brain in autism. Neuron, 32(6), 969–979. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00552-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez-Liencres, C., Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Brune, M. (2013). Towards a neuroscience of empathy: Ontogeny, phylogeny, brain mechanisms, context and psychopathology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(8), 1537–1548. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. (2018a). Cognitive gadgets. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018b). Empathy is not in our genes. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 95, 499–507. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (2019). Precis of cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, 1–13. doi:10.1017/s0140525x18002145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C., Chater, N., & Dwyer, D. M. (2020). Sinking in: The peripheral Baldwinisation of human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 884–899. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.08.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mineka, S., Davidson, M., Cook, M., & Keir, R. (1984). Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93(4), 355–372. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.93.4.355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar