Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T19:05:51.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More than fear: Contributions of biobehavioral synchrony and infants' reactivity to cooperative care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2023

Elizabeth B. daSilva Open the ORCID record for Elizabeth B. daSilva [Opens in a new window]  and
Bennett I. Bertenthal
Elizabeth B. daSilva
Affiliation:
Division of Science, Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus, Columbus, IN 47203, USA elabendy@indiana.edu; https://www.iupuc.edu/science/contact-science/liz-dasilva.html
Bennett I. Bertenthal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA bbertent@indiana.edu; https://dcnlab.sitehost.iu.edu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present two challenges to the fearful ape hypothesis: (1) biobehavioral synchrony precedes and moderates the effects of fear on cooperative care, and (2) cooperative care emerges in a more bidirectional manner than Grossmann acknowledges. We present evidence demonstrating how dyadic differences in co-regulation and individual differences in infants' reactivity shape caregivers' responses to infant affect.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e59
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, D. H., DaSilva, E. B., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2021). Associations between infant–mother physiological synchrony and 4- to 6-month-old infants’ emotion regulation. Developmental Psychobiology, 63(6), e22161. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebe, B., Messinger, D., Bahrick, L. E., Margolis, A., Buck, K. A., & Chen, H. (2016). A systems view of mother–infant face-to-face communication. Developmental Psychology, 52(4), 556–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigelow, A. E., & Power, M. (2016). Effect of maternal responsiveness on young infants’ social bidding-like behavior during the still face task. Infant and Child Development, 25(3), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/icdCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgett, D. J., Gartstein, M. A., Putnam, S. P., McKay, T., Iddins, E., Robertson, C., … Rittmueller, A. (2009). Maternal and contextual influences and the effect of temperament development during infancy on parenting in toddlerhood. Infant Behavior and Development, 32(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.10.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, C. L., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2021). Characteristics and consequences of co-experienced positive affect: Understanding the origins of social skills, social bonds, and caring, healthy communities. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, S. C. F., Werker, J. F., Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (2003). Three facial expressions mothers direct to their infants. Infant and Child Development, 12, 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/icdCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, S.-M., Haltigan, J. D., & Messinger, D. S. (2010). Dynamic infant–parent affect coupling during the face-to-face/still-face. Emotion, 10(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2007). Parent–infant synchrony: Biological foundations and developmental outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R., Greenbaum, C., & Yirmiya, N. (1999). Mother–infant affect synchrony as an antecedent of the emergence of self-control. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 223–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gee, D. G., & Cohodes, E. M. (2021). Influences of caregiving on development: A sensitive period for biological embedding of predictability and safety cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(5), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211015673CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, S. I., & Drummond, J. K. (2019). Rethinking emotions in the context of infants’ prosocial behavior: The role of interest and positive emotions. Developmental Psychology, 55(9), 1882–1888. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones-Mason, K., Alkon, A., Coccia, M., & Bush, N. R. (2018). Autonomic nervous system functioning assessed during the still-face paradigm: A meta-analysis and systematic review of methods, approach and findings. Developmental Review, 50(May), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.06.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klinnert, M. D., Emde, R. N., Butterfield, P., & Campos, J. J. (1986). Social referencing: The infant's use of emotional signals from a friendly adult with mother present. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolacz, J., DaSilva, E. B., Lewis, G. F., Bertenthal, B. I., & Porges, S. W. (2022). Associations between acoustic features of maternal speech and infants’ emotion regulation following a social stressor. Infancy, 27(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leerkes, E. M., Blankson, A. N., & O'Brien, M. (2009). Differential effects of maternal sensitivity to infant distress and nondistress on social-emotional functioning. Child Development, 80(3), 762–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01296.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohaus, A., Keller, H., Ball, J., Elben, C., & Voelker, S. (2001). Maternal sensitivity: Components and relations to warmth and contingency. Parenting: Science and Practice, 1(4), 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, P. C., Rynes, K. N., Aragon, C., Caprihan, A., Phillips, J. P., & Lowe, J. R. (2014). Mother–infant mutual eye gaze supports emotion regulation in infancy during the still-face paradigm. Infant Behavior and Development, 37(4), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.06.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills-Koonce, W. R., Gariépy, J.-L., Propper, C., Sutton, K., Calkins, S., Moore, G., & Cox, M. (2007). Infant and parent factors associated with early maternal sensitivity: A caregiver-attachment systems approach. Infant Behavior and Development, 30(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.11.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsey, M. A., & Gentzler, A. L. (2015). An upward spiral: Bidirectional associations between positive affect and positive aspects of close relationships across the life span. Developmental Review, 36, 58–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorce, J. F., Emde, R. N., Campos, J. J., & Klinnert, M. D. (1985). Maternal emotional signaling: Its effect on the visual cliff behavior of 1-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronick, E., & Beeghly, M. (2011). Infants’ meaning-making and the development of mental health problems. American Psychologist, 66(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021631.InfantsCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tronick, E. Z., & Gianino, A. (1986). Interactive mismatch and repair: Challenges to the coping infant. Zero to Three, 6(3), 1–6.Google Scholar
Tronick, E. Z., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed