Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T03:22:16.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spoiled for choice: Identifying the building blocks of folk-economic beliefs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2018

Shaylene Nancekivell  and
Ori Friedman
Shaylene Nancekivell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043. snancek@umich.edu
Ori Friedman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 2V9, Canada. friedman@uwaterloo.cahttps://uwaterloo.ca/psychology/people-profiles/ori-friedman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Boyer & Petersen suggest that folk-economic beliefs result from evolved domain-specific cognitive systems concerned with social exchange. However, a major challenge for their account is that each folk-economic belief can be explained by different combinations of evolved cognitive systems. We illustrate this by offering alternative explanations for several economic beliefs they discuss.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, A. S. & Dunham, Y. (2015) Representing “us” and “them”: Building blocks of intergroup cognition. Journal of Cognition and Development 16(5):780–801. doi:10.1080/15248372.2014.1000459.Google Scholar
Eisenberg-Berg, N., Haake, R. J. & Bartlett, K. (1981) The effects of possession and ownership on the sharing and proprietary behaviors of preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 27(1):61–68. doi:10.1080/00221325.1983.10533536.Google Scholar
Eisenberg-Berg, N., Haake, R. J., Hand, M. & Sadalla, E. (1979) Effects of instructions concerning ownership of a toy on preschoolers' sharing and defensive behaviors. Developmental Psychology 15(4):460–61. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.15.4.460.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 99(4):689–723. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689.Google Scholar
Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., Wilson, A. & Hood, B. M. (2009) Picasso paintings, moon rocks, and hand-written Beatles lyrics: Adults' evaluations of authentic objects. Journal of Cognition and Culture 9(1):1–14. doi: 10.1163/156853709X414601.Google Scholar
Furby, L. (1980) Collective possession and ownership: A study of its judged feasibility and desirability. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 8(2): 165–83. doi:10.2224/sbp.1980.8.2.165.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. (2013) Artifacts and essentialism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4(3):449–63. doi: 10.1007/s13164-013-0142-7.Google Scholar
Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J. R. & Tomasello, M. (2011) Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature 476(7360):328–31. doi:10.1038/nature10278.Google Scholar
Huh, M. & Friedman, O. (2017) Young children's understanding of the limits and benefits of group ownership. Developmental Psychology 53(4):686–97. doi:10.1037/dev0000284.Google Scholar
Kanngiesser, P. & Warneken, F. (2012) Young children consider merit when sharing resources with others. PLoS ONE 7(8):e43979. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043979.g001.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1990) The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies, trans. Halls, W. D.. Norton.Google Scholar
Newman, G. E., Diesendruck, G. & Bloom, P. (2011) Celebrity contagion and the value of objects. Journal of Consumer Research 38(2):215–28. doi:10.1086/658999.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (2012) Naïve theories of social groups. Child Development 83(6):1900–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01835.x.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. (2005) Black rednecks and white liberals: Hope, mercy, justice and autonomy in the American health care system. Encounter Books.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M. & Martinovic, B. (2017) Collective psychological ownership and intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(6):1021–39. doi:10.1177/1745691617706514.Google Scholar