Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T20:31:53.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

More than language is needed to represent and combine different core knowledge components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2024

Peter Krøjgaard*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and the Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark peter@psy.au.dk trines@psy.au.dk osman@psy.au.dk
Trine Sonne
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and the Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark peter@psy.au.dk trines@psy.au.dk osman@psy.au.dk
Osman S. Kingo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and the Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark peter@psy.au.dk trines@psy.au.dk osman@psy.au.dk
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

We question Spelke's key claim that the medium, in which contents from different core knowledge systems can be represented and combined, is language-based. Recalling an episodic memory, playing chess, and conducting mental rotation are tasks where core knowledge information is represented and combined. Although these tasks can be described by means of language, these tasks are not inherently language-based. Hence, language may be an important subset of an abstraction medium – not the medium as such.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable