Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-8hdgz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T13:48:20.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ownership psychology as a cognitive adaptation: A minimalist model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2022

Pascal Boyer Open the ORCID record for Pascal Boyer [Opens in a new window]
Pascal Boyer*
Affiliation:
Departments of Anthropology and Psychology & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA pboyer@wustl.edu; http://www.pascalboyer.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ownership is universal and ubiquitous in human societies, yet the psychology underpinning ownership intuitions is generally not described in a coherent and computationally tractable manner. Ownership intuitions are commonly assumed to derive from culturally transmitted social norms, or from a mentally represented implicit theory. While the social norms account is entirely ad hoc, the mental theory requires prior assumptions about possession and ownership that must be explained. Here I propose such an explanation, arguing that the intuitions result from the interaction of two cognitive systems. One of these handles competitive interactions for the possession of resources observed in many species including humans. The other handles mutually beneficial cooperation between agents, as observed in communal sharing, collective action and trade. Together, these systems attend to specific cues in the environment, and produce definite intuitions such as “this is hers,” “that is not mine.” This computational model provides an explanation for ownership intuitions, not just in straightforward cases of property, but also in disputed ownership (squatters, indigenous rights), historical changes (abolition of slavery), as well as apparently marginal cases, such as the questions, whether people own their seats on the bus, or their places in a queue, and how people understand “cultural appropriation” and slavery. In contrast to some previous theories, the model is empirically testable and free of ad hoc stipulations.

Keywords

cooperationevolutionary psychologyHawk–Doveownershippropertysocial norms

Information

Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e323
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2013). Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1–64). Oxford Uiversity Press.Google Scholar
Albanese, G., & de Blasio, G. (2014). Who trusts others more? A cross-European study. Empirica, 41(4), 803–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altay, S., Majima, Y., & Mercier, H. (2020). It's my idea! Reputation management and idea appropriation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(3), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, J.-B., & Baumard, N. (2011). The evolution of fairness in a biological market. Evolution, 650, 1447–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, J.-B., Debove, S., Fitouchi, L., & Baumard, N. (2022). Moral cognition as a Nash product maximizer: An evolutionary contractualist account of morality. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2hxgu.Google Scholar
Arico, A. (2010). Folk psychology, consciousness, and context effects. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(3), 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C. (2005). Adaptations to predators and prey. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 200–223). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C. (2015). The shape of thought: How mental adaptations evolve. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, P. C., & Freitag, M. (2018). Measuring trust. In Uslaner, E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp. 15–36). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumard, N., André, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2013). Partner choice, fairness, and the extension of morality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 102–122. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumol, W. J., Baumol, W. J., Oates, W. E., Bawa, V. S., Bawa, W., Bradford, D. F., & Baumol, W. J. (1988). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, R. (1997). Moral reasoning and the child with psychopathic tendencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, P. R., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Children's understanding of ownership transfers. Cognitive Development, 24, 133–145. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, P. R., & Harris, P. L. (2011). Early representations of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bliege Bird, R. L., & Bird, D. W. (1997). Delayed reciprocity and tolerated theft: The behavioral ecology of food-sharing strategies. Current Anthropology, 38, 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2009). Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3281–3288. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A. (2009). Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide. Cognition, 110, 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bshary, R. (2002). Building up relationships in asymmetric co-operation games between the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus and client reef fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 365–371. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0527-6.Google Scholar
Bshary, R., & Grutter, A. (2006). Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature, 441, 975–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccafusco, C. (2016). A theory of copyright authorship. Virginia Law Review, 102, 1229.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, B. (2005). British abolitionism and the rhetoric of sensibility. Writing, sentiment and slavery 1760–1807. Palgrave-McMillan.Google Scholar
Cowell, J. M., Lee, K., Malcolm-Smith, S., Selcuk, B., Zhou, X., & Decety, J. (2017). The development of generosity and moral cognition across five cultures. Developmental Science, 20(4), e12403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Greene, J. (2010). Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. In The Oxford handbook of moral psychology (pp. 197–209). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davoodi, T., Nelson, L. J., & Blake, P. R. (2020). Children's conceptions of ownership for self and other: Categorical ownership versus strength of claim. Child Development, 91(1), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeScioli, P., & Karpoff, R. (2015). People's judgments about classic property law cases. Human Nature, 26, 184–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeScioli, P., & Wilson, B. J. (2011). The territorial foundations of human property. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 297–304. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillian, C. D. W. C. L. (2010). Trade and exchange: Archaeological studies from history and prehistory [Document (dct)]. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg-Berg, N., Haake, R. J., & Bartlett, K. (1981). The effects of possession and ownership on the sharing and proprietary behaviors of preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 27, 61–68.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. (1991). Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltis, D., Engerman, S. L., Bradley, K. R., Cartledge, P., & Drescher, S. (2011). The Cambridge world history of slavery: Volume 3, AD 1420-AD 1804. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eswaran, M., & Neary, H. M. (2014). An economic theory of the evolutionary emergence of property rights. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(3), 203–226.Google Scholar
Fagundes, D. (2017). The social norms of waiting in line. Law & Social Inquiry, 42(4), 1179–1207. doi:10.1111/lsi.12256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortes, M. (1953). The structure of unilineal descent groups. American Anthropologist, 55(1), 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, O. (2010). Necessary for possession: How people reason about the acquisition of ownership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1161–1169. doi:10.1177/0146167210378513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (2008). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107, 829–849. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, O., Neary, K. R., Burnstein, C. L., & Leslie, A. M. (2010). Is young children's recognition of pretense metarepresentational or merely behavioral? Evidence from 2- and 3-year-olds’ understanding of pretend sounds and speech. Cognition, 115, 314–319. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, O., Neary, K. R., Defeyter, M. A., & Malcolm, S. L. (2011). Ownership and object history. In Ross, H. H. & Friedman, O. (Eds.), Origins of ownership of property: New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 132, pp. 79–90). Wiley.Google Scholar
Friedman, O., & Ross, H. (2011). Twenty-one reasons to care about the psychological basis of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furby, L. (1991). Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: A personal memoir and an appraisal of our progress. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 6, 457–463.Google Scholar
Furley, P., Schweizer, G., & Memmert, D. (2018). Thin slices of athletes’ nonverbal behavior give away game location: Testing the territoriality hypothesis of the home game advantage. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(2), 1474704918776456. doi:10.1177/1474704918776456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gambetta, D. (1993). The Sicilian mafia: The business of private protection. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (2011). Codes of the underworld: How criminals communicate. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gat, A. (2006). War in human civilization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gell, A. (1992). Inter-tribal commodity barter and reproductive gift-exchange in old Melanesia. In Humphrey, C. & Hugh-Jones, S. (Eds.), Barter, exchange, and value: An anthropological approach (pp. 142–168). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. A., Manczak, E. M., Was, A. M., & Noles, N. S. (2016). Children seek historical traces of owned objects. Child Development, 87, 239–255. doi:10.1111/cdev.12453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilley, B. (2018). The case for colonialism. Academic Questions, 31(2), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H. (2007). The evolution of private property. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2016). “It's mine!”. Re-thinking the conceptual semantics of “possession” through NSM. Language Sciences, 56, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, B. W., & Friedman, O. (2018). The development of territory-based inferences of ownership. Cognition, 177, 142–149. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grafen, A. (1987). The logic of divisively asymmetric contests: Respect for ownership and the desperado effect. Animal Behaviour, 35(2), 462–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurven, M. (2004). To give and to give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 543–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurven, M., & Winking, J. (2008). Collective action in action: Prosocial behavior in and out of the laboratory. American Anthropologist, 110, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, B. (2020). Bolivia in the age of gas. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hann, C. M. (1998). Property relations: Renewing the anthropological tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hann, C. M. (2006). The gift and reciprocity: Perspectives from economic anthropology. In Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (Vol. 1, pp. 207–223).Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319(5868), 1362–1367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, E., Engelmann, J. M., & Tomasello, M. (2019). Children engage in competitive altruism. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 179, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heywood, L. M. (2009). Slavery and its transformation in the kingdom of Kongo: 1491–1800. The Journal of African History, 50(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, J. (1993). Judgments about the right to property from preschool to adulthood. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 135–146. doi:10.1007/bf01044542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, E. E. (1968). Primitive trade: Its psychology and economics. A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1995). Languages of the mind: Essays on mental representation. Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Kanngiesser, P., Gjersoe, N., & Hood, B. M. (2010). The effect of creative labor on property-ownership transfer by preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 21, 1236–1241. doi:10.1177/0956797610380701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanngiesser, P., Rossano, F., Frickel, R., Tomm, A., & Tomasello, M. (2019a). Children, but not great apes, respect ownership. Developmental Science, 23(1), e12842. doi:10.1111/desc.12842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanngiesser, P., Rossano, F., Zeidler, H., Haun, D., & Tomasello, M. (2019b). Children's respect for ownership across diverse societies. Developmental Psychology, 55(11), 2286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, H. S., & Gurven, M. (2005). The natural history of human food sharing and cooperation: A review and a new multi-individual approach to the negotiation of norms. In Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (Eds.), Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life (pp. 75–113). MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. L. (1995). The foraging spectrum: Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kim, U., Helgesen, G., & Ahn, B. M. (2002). Democracy, trust, and political efficacy: Comparative analysis of Danish and Korean political culture. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 318–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbrough, E. O., Smith, V. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2008). Historical property rights, sociality, and the emergence of impersonal exchange in long-distance trade. American Economic Review, 98(3), 1009–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokko, H., López-Sepulcre, A., & Morrell, L. J. (2006). From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior. The American Naturalist, 167(6), 901–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., Pedersen, E. J., & Tooby, J. (2012). What are punishment and reputation for? PLoS ONE, 7, e45662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasnow, M. M., Delton, A. W., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2016). Looking under the hood of third-party punishment reveals design for personal benefit. Psychological Science, 27(3), 405–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krasnow, M. M., Delton, A. W., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2013). Meeting now suggests we will meet again: Implications for debates on the evolution of cooperation. Nature Scientific Reports, 3, 1747. doi:10.1038/srep01747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krier, J. E. (2009). Evolutionary theory and the origin of property rights. Cornell Law Review, 95, 139.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (1982). Lineage theory: A critical retrospect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 11(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, R. L. M. (1984). Malaysian queue culture: An ethnography of urban public behaviour. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 12(2), 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, P. T., Hardy, R. A., & Suarez, P. A. (2022). Hobo economicus. The Economic Journal, 132(646), 2325–2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M., Friedman, O., & German, T. P. (2004). Core mechanisms in “theory of mind”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 529–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levene, M., Starmans, C., & Friedman, O. (2015). Creation in judgments about the establishment of ownership. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 445, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litwinski, L. (1942). Is there an instinct of possession. British Journal of Psychology, 33(1), 28.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1988[1689]). Two treatises of government. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, L. (1969). Queue culture: The waiting line as a social system. American Journal of Sociology, 75(3), 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, M. (1954). The gift; forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Free Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246(5427), 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K. A., & Smith, V. L. (2001). Goodwill accounting and the process of exchange. In Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 319–340). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, M., Navarrete, C. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2012). Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: The male warrior hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 670–679. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPhail, C., & Wohlstein, R. T. (1983). Individual and collective behaviors within gatherings, demonstrations, and riots. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 579–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2009). Intuitive and reflective inferences. In Evans, J. S. B. T. & Frankish, K. (Eds.), In two minds. Dual processes and beyond (pp. 149–170). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, A. (2012). Illegitimate appropriation or just punishment? The confiscation of property in Ancien Régime Criminal Law and Doctrine. In Lorenzetti, L., Barbot, M., & Morelli, L. (Eds.), Property rights and their violations. Expropriations and confiscations, 16th-20th centuries (pp. 37–49). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nancekivell, S. E., Friedman, O., & Gelman, S. A. (2019). Ownership matters: People possess a naïve theory of ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 102–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D. (2009). Ecological influences on human behavioural diversity: A review of recent findings. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 618–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D. (2010). Dying young and living fast: Variation in life history across English neighborhoods. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettle, D., Colléony, A., & Cockerill, M. (2011). Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e26922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noles, N. S., Keil, F. C., Bloom, P., & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Children's and adults’ intuitions about who can own things. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12, 265–286. doi:10.1163/15685373-12342076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliar, D., & Sprigman, C. (2008). There's no free laugh (anymore): The emergence of intellectual property norms and the transformation of stand-up comedy. Virginia Law Review, 2008, 1787–1867.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2017). Preschoolers’ generosity increases with understanding of the affective benefits of sharing. Developmental Science, 20(3), e12417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietraszewski, D., & Shaw, A. (2015). Not by strength alone. Human Nature, 26(1), 44–72. doi:10.1007/s12110-015-9220-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietraszewski, D., & Wertz, A. E. (2011). Reverse engineering the structure of cognitive mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 209–210. doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. Viking.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. (1980). A theory of primitive society, with special reference to law. Journal of Law and Economics, 23, 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarantelli, E. L., & Dynes, R. R. (1970). Property norms and looting: Their patterns in community crises. Phylon (1960–), 31(2), 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quillien, T. (2020). When do we think that X caused Y? Cognition, 205, 104410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renfrew, C. (1969). Trade and culture process in European prehistory. Current Anthropology, 10, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. G. (1976). Laches in federal substantive law: Relation to statutes of limitations. BUL Review, 56, 970.Google Scholar
Rochat, P., Robbins, E., Passos-Ferreira, C., Oliva, A. D., Dias, M. D., & Guo, L. (2014). Ownership reasoning in children across cultures. Cognition, 132(3), 471–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, M. J. (1997). Celebration, politics, selective looting and riots: A micro level study of the Bulls riot of 1992 in Chicago. Social Problems, 44(4), 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H. (1996). Negotiating principles of entitlement in sibling property disputes. Developmental Psychology, 32, 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudmin, F. W. (1994). Cross-cultural psycholinguistic field research: Verbs of ownership and possession. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 114–132. doi:10.1177/0022022194251007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & Tummolini, L. (2018). Cues of control modulate the ascription of object ownership. Psychological Research, 82, 929–954. doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0871-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, M. S. (2003). Panhandling. Citeseer.Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2014). Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Setchell, J. M., Charpentier, M., & Wickings, E. J. (2005). Mate guarding and paternity in mandrills: Factors influencing alpha male monopoly. Animal Behaviour, 70, 1105–1120. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, A., Li, V., & Olson, K. R. (2012). Children apply principles of physical ownership to ideas. Cognitive Science, 36, 1383–1403. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01265.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, P. (1981). The expanding circle. Citeseer.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1996). Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smead, R., & Forber, P. (2020). Convention and the origins of ownership. Philosophy of Science, 87(5), 884–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, G. D. (2012). American abolitionism and slave-breeding discourse: A re-evaluation. Slavery and Abolition 33(4), 551–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperber, D. (1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language, 12, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Baumard, N. (2012). Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind & Language, 27, 495–518. doi:10.1111/mila.12000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. (2001). Tense and tender ties: The politics of comparison in North American history and (post) colonial studies. The Journal of American History, 88(3), 829–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stonehouse, E. E., & Friedman, O. (2021). Unsolicited but acceptable: Non-owners can access property if the owner benefits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strassmann, J. E., & Queller, D. C. (2014). Privatization and property in biology. Animal Behaviour, 92, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. (1937). The professional thief. By a professional thief. Annotated and interpreted by Edwin H. Sutherland.Google Scholar
Tatone, D., Geraci, A., & Csibra, G. (2015). Giving and taking: Representational building blocks of active resource-transfer events in human infants. Cognition, 137, 47–62. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, A. (2004). From petitions to partyism: Antislavery and the domestication of Maine politics in the 1840s and 1850s. New England Quarterly, 77, 70–88.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. S. (2018). The case against the case for colonialism. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(1), 19–32. doi:10.5840/ijap2018820100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report, 88(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (Eds.) (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Price, M. E. (2006). Cognitive adaptations for nâperson exchange: The evolutionary roots of organizational behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27(2–3), 103–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umbres, R. (2022). Living with distrust: Morality and cooperation in a Romanian village. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Creveld, M. (2013). Wargames: From gladiators to gigabytes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M., Sierksma, J., & Martinovic, B. (2015a). First arrival and collective land ownership: How children reason about who owns the land. Social Development, 24(4), 868–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M., Sierksma, J., & Thijs, J. (2015b). First arrival and owning the land: How children reason about ownership of territory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, B. A. (2010). The impact of the American doctrine of discovery on native land rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Seattle University Law Review, 34, 507.Google Scholar
Welch, M. R., Rivera, R. E. N., Conway, B. P., Yonkoski, J., Lupton, P. M., & Giancola, R. (2005). Determinants and consequences of social trust. Sociological Inquiry, 75, 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In Barkow, J. H. & Cosmides, L. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 289–322). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yoder, K. J., & Decety, J. (2018). The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(3), 279–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, J. O., & Brunk, C. G. (2012). The ethics of cultural appropriation. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar