Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Field, Tiffany
2025.
Relationships research: a narrative review.
Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 6,
p.
236.
Martin, Ashley E.
and
Yoo, Seung Joo
2025.
The paradox of privilege: The downsides of masculinity for men and organizations.
Research in Organizational Behavior,
Vol. 45,
Issue. ,
p.
100226.
Blanz, Mathias
and
Jänsch, Jessica
2025.
Barriers for Male Victims of Intimate Partner Violence to Seek and to Find Help: An Anonymous Online Survey from Germany.
Open Journal of Applied Sciences,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 07,
p.
1946.
Chavez, C. Leonardo Jimenez
Peltier, MacKenzie R.
and
McKee, Sherry A.
2025.
Sex differences in the impact of social determinants of health on substance use disorder treatment outcomes.
Biology of Sex Differences,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
Komlenac, Nikola
2025.
Fear of being single moderates the link between relationship status and psychological or sexual well-being.
Psychology & Sexuality,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
1064.
Warren, Alison
2025.
Loneliness as a driver of allostatic load: mechanisms linking social disconnection to physiological dysregulation and health disparities.
Stress,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
Lucchi Basili, Lorenza
and
Sacco, Pier Luigi
2025.
Dance and the Embodied Social Cognition of Mating: Carlos Saura’s Tango in the Perspective of the Tie-Up Theory.
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 1,
Wahring, Iris V.
Ghose, Urmimala
Hoppmann, Christiane A.
Ram, Nilam
and
Gerstorf, Denis
2026.
Relationship transitions and well-being in middle-aged and older men and women.
International Journal of Behavioral Development,
Park, Chaerim
and
Shin, Huiyoung
2026.
Social relationship dimensions and network links to loneliness and depression in midlife and older adulthood.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 5,
p.
1494.
Wahring, Iris V.
Gerstorf, Denis
and
Nikitin, Jana
2026.
The dynamic interplay of merit and appreciation in love: Variations by gender, age, and relationship duration.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 49,
Issue. ,
Wells, Tayler
Hoan, Elaine
and
MacDonald, Geoff
2026.
Happily Ever After? Singles’ Expectations of Romantic Relationships Are Associated With Singlehood Satisfaction and Future Romantic Outcomes.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Zoppolat, Giulia
Barreto, Manuela
Qualter, Pamela
Crosbie, Jasmine
and
Doyle, David Matthew
2026.
Does Romantic Involvement Benefit Everyone? Testing a Foundational Tenet in Relationship Science Through the Case of Asexuality.
Social Psychological and Personality Science,
Qin, Helena Yuchen
Hoan, Elaine
Joel, Samantha
and
MacDonald, Geoff
2026.
In What Domains Does Entering a Romantic Relationship Boost Well-Being? A Longitudinal Investigation.
Social Psychological and Personality Science,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
447.
Johansen, Anna Torp
Bélanger, Sissel Marguerite
Reneflot, Anne
Hem, Erlend
Aakhus, Eivind
Øien-Ødegaard, Carine
Stene-Larsen, Kim
and
Hartberg, Cecilie Bhandari
2026.
Suicide and sociodemographic factors among older adults in Norway: a register-based study.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 3,
p.
505.
Tang, Minghao
and
Wu, Xiaogang
2026.
Family background, romantic experience and college students’ realistic attitudes toward love in China.
Social Science Research,
Vol. 134,
Issue. ,
p.
103283.
Tartari, Maria
Conti, Alice
Candeloro, Giulia
Lucchi Basili, Lorenza
Uboldi, Sara
and
Sacco, Pier Luigi
2026.
Cultural fiction as predictive-affective simulation: a neurocognitive model of male emotional regulation and gender violence prevention.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 17,
Issue. ,
Ho, Daniel
Tan, Kenneth
Li, Norman P.
and
Sim, Lester
2026.
The (Simp)le Truth About Excessive and Obsessive Romantic Behaviors in Men.
Journal of Personality,
Langlais, Michael
and
Elias, Erika
2026.
When Love Pauses: Examining the Physiological Consequences of Temporary Breakups.
Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
67.
Hoan, Elaine
Shi, Xin
Hu, Julia
and
MacDonald, Geoff
2026.
“Leftover” or Flourishing? Gender Differences in Well‐Being Among Chinese Singles.
Personal Relationships,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 2,
Target article
Romantic Relationships Matter More to Men than to Women
Related commentaries (43)
Sexual relationships matter more to men than to women
A cultural lens on romantic dependence
A matter of context: Gender differences vary across life stage, historical context, and individual characteristics
A memory lens on gender differences in romantic relationships
Are men more dependent or more powerful than women?
Beyond social structures: An evolutionary network perspective on gendered romantic dependency
Broader gender inequities shape why romantic relationships matter more to men than to women
Concluding that romantic relationships matter more to men than to women is too simple
Considering error management theory can provide a more comprehensive model as to why romantic relationships matter more to men than women
Culture, not nature: How traditional masculinity shapes male attitudes toward relationships
Desperate to connect: Men’s dependence on romantic relationship in a competitive mating landscape
Do romantic relationships matter less to women than to men because men provide lower-quality emotional support?
Do romantic relationships matter more to men than to women? An evolutionary psychology perspective
Evolutionary reasons why men are more likely to engage in romantic behavior than women
Fear of relationship dissolution: The influence of gendered post-breakup life course expectations
Gender differences in partner and ex-partner dreams
If men benefit more, should women demand more? A commentary on relationship dependence and mate selectivity
Impaired emotional regulation in the elderly men following female partner loss
Inconsistent use of evolutionary frameworks in accounts of romantic relationships
Men’s dependence in intimate relationships has broader harm beyond men’s wellbeing
Morality in romantic relationships
Only genderless society can solve the problem of emotional support for men
Parenthood as an inflection point for men and women’s patterns of interdependence
Parsimony and basic principles in human “romantic” relationships
Partner-serving moral cognition helps men to maintain romantic relationships from which they benefit more than women
Profound romantic relationships matter more to women than to men
Reassessing romantic dependency: Gendered vulnerabilities and cultural realities beyond the Western lens
Romantic relationships matter more to men than to women: Based on Darwinian gender differences of fitness-enhancing effects in having sexual partners
Scant evidence, sweeping claim: Do romantic relationships matter more to men?
Sex and romance are close evolutionary bedfellows
Synthetic love in the digital age: AI-mediated emotional investment and gendered romantic dependence
Testing sex differences in the relationship context needs the inclusion of gay and lesbian couples
The asymmetric structure of male-female bonding explains gender differences in relationship dependence
The costs and rewards of men’s romantic dependence: A gendered perspective
The cultural plasticity of intimacy behavior: A socioecological attachment perspective
The obsolete male and the mismatch in sexual desire
The support-deficit perspective is now the parsimonious explanation for gender differences in human mating
Unveiling gender dynamics in romantic relationships: A comprehensive analysis
Using self-determination theory to consider gender differences in the importance of romantic relationships
Well-being and resilience against oppressive narratives after romantic dissolution
Who benefits most from romantic relationships and who bears the burdens?
Why do romantic relationships matter more to men than to women? The commitment problem and market competition for useful men
Why does the belief that women are more romantic persist despite empirical evidence?
Author response
Understanding gender differences across relationship stages requires integrating evolutionary, ontological, and proximate mechanisms