Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T02:15:54.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation does not just inform choice, it changes choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2023

Karalyn F. Enz Open the ORCID record for Karalyn F. Enz [Opens in a new window]  and
Diana I. Tamir Open the ORCID record for Diana I. Tamir [Opens in a new window]
Karalyn F. Enz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA. kenz@princeton.edu dtamir@princeton.edu https://scholar.princeton.edu/kenz https://psnlab.princeton.edu/
Diana I. Tamir
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA. kenz@princeton.edu dtamir@princeton.edu https://scholar.princeton.edu/kenz https://psnlab.princeton.edu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simulation – imagining future events – plays a role in decision-making. In Conviction Narrative Theory, people's emotional responses to their simulations inform their choices. Yet imagining one possible future also increases its plausibility and accessibility relative to other futures. We propose that the act of simulation, in addition to affective evaluation, drives people to choose in accordance with their simulations.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e91
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7931095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enz, K. F., & Tamir, D. I. (in prep). Imagine before you decide: Episodic simulation increases the likelihood of choosing the simulated option.Google Scholar
Gaesser, B., Shimura, Y., & Cikara, M. (2020). Episodic simulation reduces intergroup bias in prosocial intentions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 683–705. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E. F., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(2), 208–214. doi: 10.3758/BF03212420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iglesias-Parro, S., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J. (2006). Biasing decision making by means of retrieval practice. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(6), 899–908. doi: 10.1080/09541440500501189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, G. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147). Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Klein, G. (2005). Recognition-primed decisions. In Moray, N. (Ed.), Ergonomics: Major writings (Vol. 3, pp. 271–307). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Morris, A., Phillips, J., Huang, K., & Cushman, F. (2021). Generating options and choosing between them depend on distinct forms of value representation. Psychological Science, 32(11), 1731–1746. doi: 10.1177/09567976211005702CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, J., Morris, A., & Cushman, F. (2019). How we know what not to think. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(12), 1026–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, J., Fernandes, M., & Kosnes, L. (2009). Retrieval-induced forgetting and mental imagery. Memory & Cognition, 37(6), 819–828. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.819CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., De Brigard, F., & Szpunar, K. K. (2015). Episodic future thinking and episodic counterfactual thinking: Intersections between memory and decisions. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 117, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.12.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (1985). Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease: The mediating effect of ease of imagery. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 118–127. doi: 10.1177/0146167285111011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szpunar, K. K., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Get real: Effects of repeated simulation and emotion on the perceived plausibility of future experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(2), 323–327. doi: 10.1037/a0028877CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, H., & Wallsten, T. S. (2011). A query theory account of the effect of memory retrieval on the sunk cost bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 767–773. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0099-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2011). Query theory: Knowing what we want by arguing with ourselves. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 91–92. doi: 10.1017/s0140525×10002797CrossRefGoogle Scholar