Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-23T03:47:53.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fechner revisited: Towards an inclusive approach to aesthetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

W. Tecumseh Fitch
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. tecumseh.fitch@univie.ac.at gesche.w.fitch@univie.ac.at http://cogbio.univie.ac.at
Gesche Westphal-Fitch
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. tecumseh.fitch@univie.ac.at gesche.w.fitch@univie.ac.at http://cogbio.univie.ac.at

Abstract

Accepting Bullot & Reber's (B&R's) criteria for art appreciation would confine the study of aesthetics to those works for which historical information is available, mainly post–eighteenth-century Western “high art.” We reject their contention that “correct” artistic understanding is limited to experts with detailed knowledge or education in art, which implies a narrowly elitist conception of aesthetics. Scientific aesthetics must be broadly inclusive.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable