Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T02:48:05.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questioning the necessity of the aesthetic modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Katherine Tullmann
Katherine Tullmann*
Affiliation:
The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, Philosophy & Cognitive Science, New York, NY 10016. ktullmann@gc.cuny.edu http://web.gc.cuny.edu/philosophy/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I question both the necessity and the sufficiency of Bullot & Reber's (B&R's) aesthetic modes. I argue that they have not shown how the aesthetic modes are truly “aesthetic” – how they concern our experience of artworks as opposed to other kinds of experiences or why the modes are individually necessary for one. I suggest the causal dependence of the modes should be modified.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 160 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Danto, A. C. (1981) The transfiguration of the commonplace: A philosophy of art. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1993) Déjà vu all over again: How Danto's aesthetics recapitulates the philosophy of mind. In: Danto and his critics, ed. Rollins, M., pp. 41–54. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2011) Art and the limits of neuroscience. Opinionator, The New York Times, (December 4). Available at: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/2012/2004/art-and-the-limits-of-neuroscience.Google Scholar
Onians, J. (2008) Neuroarthistory: From Aristotle and Pliney to Baxandall and Zeki. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. & Hirstein, W. (1999) The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (6–7):15–51.Google Scholar
Zeki, S. (1999) Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar