Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T08:22:29.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Nicolas J. Bullot  and
Rolf Reber
Nicolas J. Bullot
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia. nicolas.bullot@mq.edu.au http://www.maccs.mq.edu.au/members/profile.html?memberID=521
Rolf Reber
Affiliation:
Department of Education, University of Bergen, Postboks 7807, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. rolf.reber@psysp.uib.no http://www.uib.no/persons/Rolf.Reber#publikasjoner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research seeking a scientific foundation for the theory of art appreciation has raised controversies at the intersection of the social and cognitive sciences. Though equally relevant to a scientific inquiry into art appreciation, psychological and historical approaches to art developed independently and lack a common core of theoretical principles. Historicists argue that psychological and brain sciences ignore the fact that artworks are artifacts produced and appreciated in the context of unique historical situations and artistic intentions. After revealing flaws in the psychological approach, we introduce a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. This framework demonstrates that a science of art appreciation must investigate how appreciators process causal and historical information to classify and explain their psychological responses to art. Expanding on research about the cognition of artifacts, we identify three modes of appreciation: basic exposure to an artwork, the artistic design stance, and artistic understanding. The artistic design stance, a requisite for artistic understanding, is an attitude whereby appreciators develop their sensitivity to art-historical contexts by means of inquiries into the making, authorship, and functions of artworks. We defend and illustrate the psycho-historical framework with an analysis of existing studies on art appreciation in empirical aesthetics. Finally, we argue that the fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure can be amended to meet the requirements of the framework. We conclude that scientists can tackle fundamental questions about the nature and appreciation of art within the psycho-historical framework.

Keywords

art appreciationcausal reasoningcognition of artifactscognitive trackingdesign stanceessentialismfunctionhistory of artmindreadingprocessing fluencypsycho-historical framework

Information

Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 123 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alter, A. L. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review 13:219–35. DOI: 10.1177/1088868309341564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N. & Eyre, R. N. (2007) Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136:569–76. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. C. & Pearson, P. D. (1984) A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In: Handbook of reading research, ed. Barr, R., Kamil, M. L. & Mosenthal, P., pp. 255–91. Longman.Google Scholar
Antliff, M. (2000) The fourth dimension and futurism: A politicized space. The Art Bulletin 82(4):720–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnau, F. (1961) The art of the faker: Three thousand years of deception. Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1956/1974) Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1981) Style as a Gestalt problem. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39(3):281–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1986) New essays in the psychology of art. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzouni, J. (2004) Theory, observation and scientific realism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55(3):371–92. DOI: 10.1093/bjps/55.3.371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) Mindblindness. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, K. & Wellman, H. J. (1995) Children talk about the mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, M. (1985) Patterns of intention. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, M. C. (1958/1981) Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism (second edition). Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Beckett, S. (1954) Waiting for Godot: A tragicomedy in two acts. Grove Press.Google Scholar
Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T. & Carbon, C. C. (2010) Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4:214–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1936/2008) The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility, second version, trans. E. Jephcott, R. Livingstone & H. Eiland. In: The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility, and other writings on media, ed. Jennings, M. W., Doherty, B. & Levin, T. Y., pp. 19–55. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology. Meredith.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E., ed. (1974) Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Bigand, E. & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2006) Are we “experienced listeners”? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training. Cognition 100:100–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (1996a) Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition 60:1–29. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00699-0.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (1998) Theories of artifact categorization. Cognition 66:87–93. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00003-1.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2004) Descartes' baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2010) How pleasure works: The new science of why we like what we like. Norton.Google Scholar
Boccioni, U. (1914/1977) Pittura scultura futuriste: Dinamismo plastico. Vallechi.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979/1987) Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, trans. Nice, R.. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1992/1996) Rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field, trans. Emanuel, S.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (1991) Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philosophical Studies 61:127–48. DOI: 10.1007/bf00385837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, B. (1964) Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic, trans. Willett, J.. Methuen.Google Scholar
Bredius, A. (1937) A new Vermeer: Christ and the disciples at Emmaus. The Burlington Magazine 71:210–11.Google Scholar
Breton, A. (2008) Le surréalisme et la peinture [1928–1946–1965]. Ecrits sur l'art, Œuvres complètes, IV, pp. 346–846. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Budd, M. (1995) Values of art: Pictures, poetry and music. Allen Lane/The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Bullot, N. J. (2009a) Material anamnesis and the prompting of aesthetic worlds: The psycho-historical theory of artworks. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16(1):85–109. Available at: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/2009/00000016/00000001/art00004.Google Scholar
Bullot, N. J. (2009b) Toward a theory of the empirical tracking of individuals: Cognitive flexibility and the functions of attention in integrated tracking. Philosophical Psychology 22(3):353–87. DOI: 10.1080/09515080902969006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullot, N. J. (2011) Attention, information and epistemic perception. In: Information and living systems: Essays in philosophy of biology, ed. Terzis, G. & Arp, R., pp. 309–52. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullough, E. (1957) Aesthetics: Lectures and essays. Bowes & Bowes.Google Scholar
Cage, J. (1961/1973) Silence: Lectures and writings. Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1985) Conceptual change in childhood. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (1999) Philosophy of art: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (2002) Aesthetic experience revisited. British Journal of Aesthetics 42(2):145–68. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.2.145.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (2004) Art and human nature. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62(2):95–107. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00143.x.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (1992) Human knowledge and human nature: A new introduction to an ancient debate. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2002) The roots of scientific reasoning: infancy, modularity and the art of tracking. In: The cognitive basis of science, ed. Carruthers, P., Stich, S. & Siegal, M., pp. 73–95. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2006a) The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2006b) Why pretend? In: The architecture of the imagination: New essays on pretence, possibility, and fiction, ed. Nichols, S., pp. 89–109. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2009) Mindreading underlies metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(02):164–82. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X09000831.Google Scholar
Chase, W. G. & Simon, H. A. (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4(1):55–81. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2011a) Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story. The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(1):53–62. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21457$$$.Google Scholar
Chikofsky, E. & Cross, J. H. II. (1990) Reverse engineering and design recovery: A taxonomy. IEEE Software 7(7):13–17. DOI: 10.1109/52.43044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, H. & Schwarz, N. (2006) If I don't understand it, it must be new: Processing fluency and perceived product innovativeness. Advances in Consumer Research 33:319–20.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1966) Topics in the theory of generative grammar. Mouton.Google Scholar
Clark, K. (1961) Looking at pictures. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1938) The principles of art. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1946) The idea of history. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Menzies, P. & Sutton, J. (2009) Abductive inference and delusional belief. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 15(1–3):261–87. DOI: 10.1080/13546800903439120.Google Scholar
Coremans, P. B. (1949) Van Meegeren's faked Vermeers and de Hooghs: A scientific examination. J. M. Meulenhoff.Google Scholar
Crane, D. (1989) The transformation of the avant-garde: The New York art world, 1940–1985. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crimp, D. (1981) Richard Serra: Sculpture exceeded. October 18:67–78.Google Scholar
Croce, B. (1902/1909) Aesthetic as science of expression and general linguistic, trans. Ainslie, D.. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Croce, B. (1921) The essence of aesthetic, trans. Ainslie, D.. William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Robinson, R. E. (1990) The art of seeing: An interpretation of the æsthetic experience. J. Paul Getty Museum & The Getty Education Institute for the Arts.Google Scholar
Cudworth, C. L. (1954) Ye Olde Spuriosity Shoppe, or, Put it in the Anhang . Notes, Second Series 12(1):25–40.Google Scholar
Currie, G. (1989) An ontology of art. Macmillan Press and Scots Philosophical Club.Google Scholar
Currie, G. (1990) The nature of fiction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Currie, G. (1995) Imagination and simulation: Aesthetics meets cognitive science. In: Mental simulation: Evaluations and applications, ed. Davies, M. & Stone, T., pp. 151–69. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Currie, G. (2003) Aesthetics and cognitive science. In: The Oxford handbook of aesthetics, ed. Levinson, J., pp. 706–21. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Currie, G. (2004) Arts and minds. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. & Ravenscroft, I. (2003) Recreative minds: Imagination in philosophy and psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. E. (2003) Gustave Caillebotte, French impressionism, and mere exposure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10:319–43.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994) Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1964) The artworld. Journal of Philosophy 61(19):571–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1974) The transfiguration of the commonplace. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33(2):139–48.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1992) Beyond the Brillo box: The visual arts in post-historical perspective. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1998) After the end of art: Contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (2003) The abuse of beauty: Aesthetics and the concept of art. Open Court.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (2009) Andy Warhol. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, D. (2004) Art as performance. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davies, S. (2006a) Aesthetic judgments, artworks and functional beauty. The Philosophical Quarterly 56(223):224–41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2006.00439.x.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1990) The interpretation of texts, people and other artifacts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50(Issue Supplement):177–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1910) The analysis of a complete act of thought. In: How we think, pp. 68–78. D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (1984/1997) The art circle: A theory of art. Chicago Spectrum Press.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (2000) The institutional theory of art. In: Theories of art today, ed. Carroll, N., pp. 93–108. The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. I. (1988) Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ducasse, C. J. (1964) Art and the language of the emotions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23(1):109–12.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (1974) To understand it on its own terms. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35(2):246–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, D. (1979) Artistic crimes: The concept of forgery in the arts. British Journal of Aesthetics 19(4):302–14. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/19.4.302.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2005) Aesthetic universals. In: The Routledge companion to aesthetics, second edition, ed. Gaut, B. N. & Lopes, D. M., pp. 279–92. Routledge.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2009) The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure & human evolution. Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, D., ed. (1983) The forger's art: Forgery and the philosophy of art. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, M. M. (2000) A sustainable definition of “art.” In: Theories of art today, ed. Carroll, N., pp. 141–59. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Eco, U. & Sebeok, T. A. eds. (1983) The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion 6(3–4):169–200. DOI: 10.1080/02699939208411068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, N. (1939/1969) The civilizing process, Vol. I. The history of manners. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Esslin, M. (1961) The theatre of the absurd. Doubleday.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1982) The varieties of reference. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1876) Vorschule der Äesthetik [Elements of aesthetics]. Druck und Verlag von Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Foster, H. (2002) Design and crime and other diatribes. Verso.Google Scholar
Freedberg, D. (1989) The power of images: Studies in the history and theory of response. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Freedberg, D. & Gallese, V. (2007) Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(5):197–203.Google Scholar
Fried, M. (1998) Art and objecthood: Essays and reviews. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frigg, R. & Howard, C. (2011) Fact and fiction in the neuropsychology of art. In: The aesthetic mind: Philosophy and psychology, ed. Schellekens, E. & Goldie, P., pp. 54–70. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gann, K. (2010) No such thing as silence: John Cage's 4′33″. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1970) Children's sensitivity to painting styles. Child Development 41(3):813–21.Google Scholar
Geldzahler, H. (1994) Making it new: Essays, interview, and talks. Turtle Point Press.Google Scholar
Gell, A. (1998) Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. A. (2003) The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gendler, T. S. (2000) The puzzle of imaginative resistance. The Journal of Philosophy 97(2):55–81.Google Scholar
Gendler, T. S. (2004) Thought experiments rethought – and reperceived. Philosophy of Science 71(5):1152–63. DOI: 10.1086/425239.Google Scholar
Gendler, T. S. (2006) Imaginative contagion. Metaphilosophy 37(2):183–203. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00430.x.Google Scholar
Gendler, T. S. (2010) Intuition, imagination, and philosophical methodology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gendler, T. S. & Hawthorne, J., eds. (2002) Conceivability and possibility. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
German, T. P. & Johnson, S. C. (2002) Function and the origins of the design stance. Journal of Cognition and Development 3(3):279–300. DOI: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0303_2.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. (1979) Clues: Roots of a scientific paradigm. Theory and Society 7(3):273–88.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. & Sterelny, K. (2007) Biological information. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-biological/.Google Scholar
Godley, J. (1951) Master art forger: The story of Han van Meegeren. Wilfred Funk.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2006) Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1950/1951) The story of art, fourth edition, Phaidon.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1960) Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1963) Meditations of a hobby horse: And other essays on the theory of art. Phaidon.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1979) The sense of order: A study in the psychology of decorative art. Phaidon.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1990) Pictorial instructions. In: Images and understanding, thoughts about images, ideas about understanding, ed. Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C. & Weston-Smith, M., pp. 26–45. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (2000) Concerning “The science of art”: Commentary on Ramachandran and Hirstein. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7(8–9):17.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (2002) The preference for the primitive: Episodes in the history of western taste and art. Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1968) The languages of art. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1978) Ways of worldmaking. Hackett.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997) Words, thoughts, and theories. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Schulz, L. eds. (2007) Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H. M. (1994) The theory theory. In: Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture, ed. Hirschfeld, L. A. & Gelman, S. A., pp. 257–93. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, B. (2012) Aesthetic science and artistic knowledge. In: Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience, ed. Shimamura, A. P. & Palmer, S. E., pp. 129–59. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. C. & Holyoak, K. J. (1983) Implicit learning and generalization of the “mere exposure” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45:492–500.Google Scholar
Görner, V. (1997) Jörg Immendorf: Bild mit Geduld [Immendorf: Picture with Patience]. Hatje Cantz.Google Scholar
Gracyk, T. (2009) Ontological contextualism. In: A companion to aesthetics: second edition, ed. Davies, S., Higgins, K. M., Hopkins, R., Stecker, R. & Cooper, D. E., pp. 449–53. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grandy, R. E. (2007) Artifacts: Parts and principles. In: Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation, ed. Margolis, E. & Laurence, S., pp. 18–32. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, C. (1961) Art and culture. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1957) Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66(3):377–88.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. (1999) Squaring the circle: Natural kinds with historical essences. In: Species: New interdisciplinary essays, ed. Wilson, R. A., pp. 209–28. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guercio, G. (2006) Art as existence: The artist's monograph and its project. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gutheil, G., Bloom, P., Valderrama, N. & Freedman, R. (2004) The role of historical intuitions in children's and adults' naming of artifacts. Cognition 91(1):23–42. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00165-3.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2000) The work of the imagination. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haskell, H. (1996) The early music revival: A history. Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Hauser, A. (1951) The social history of art. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.Google Scholar
Heinich, N. (1996b) The glory of van Gogh: An anthropology of admiration, trans. Leduc Browne, P.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. V. (1863) Die lehre von den tonempfindungen als physiologische grundlage für die theorie der musik. Vieweg.Google Scholar
Hilpinen, R. (2004) Artifact. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (online). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artifact/.Google Scholar
Hood, B. M. & Bloom, P. (2008) Children prefer certain individuals over perfect duplicates. Cognition 106(1):455–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.012.Google Scholar
Hookway, C. (2002) Emotions and epistemic evaluations. In: The cognitive basis of science, ed. Carruthers, P., Stich, S. & Siegal, M., pp. 251–62. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1757/1993) Of the standard of taste. In: Selected essays, ed. Copley, S. & Edgar, A., pp. 133–54, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeshion, R., ed. (2010) New essays on singular thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Juslin, P. N. & Västfjäll, D. (2008) Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31:559–621. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X08005293.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1793/2000) Critique of the power of judgment, trans. Guyer, P. & Matthews, E.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. (1992) Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism. In: The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J., pp. 581–98. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1989) Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (2006) Explanation and understanding. Annual Review of Psychology 57(1):227–54. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. & Wilson, R. A. eds. (2000) Explanation and cognition. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelemen, D. (1999) Function, goals and intention: Children's teleological reasoning about objects. Cognition 3(12):461–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Kelemen, D. & Carey, S. (2007) The essence of artifacts: Developing the design stance. In: Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation, ed. Margolis, E. & Laurence, S., pp. 212–30. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keysar, B. & Barr, D. J. (2002) Self-anchoring in conversation: Why language users do not do what they “should.” In: Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment, ed. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D., pp. 150–66. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieran, M. & Lopes, D. M. (2006) Knowing art: Essays in aesthetics and epistemology. Springer.Google Scholar
Kinder, A., Shanks, D. R., Cock, J. & Tunney, R. J. (2003) Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132:551–65.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (2005) An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse Processes 39(2–3):125–28. DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2005.9651676.Google Scholar
Knobe, J. (2010) Person as scientist, person as moralist. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(04):315–29. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X10000907.Google Scholar
Kreitler, H. & Kreitler, S. (1972) The psychology of the arts. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kruger, J., Wirtz, D., Van Boven, L. & Altermatt, T. W. (2004) The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40(1):91–98. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00065-9.Google Scholar
Kwon, M. (2002) One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, M. (2009) Approaching architecture: The case of Richard Serra and Michael Asher. Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin:44–55.Google Scholar
Lang, B., ed. (1987) The concept of style (second edition) Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (1962) Two cultures? The significance of C. P. Snow. Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A. & Augustin, D. (2004) A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology 95:489–508. DOI: 10.1348/0007126042369811.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1996) The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Touchstone.Google Scholar
Levinson, J. (1990) Music, art, and metaphysics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, J. (1996a) Art, value, and philosophy. Mind 105(420):667–82.Google Scholar
Levinson, J. (2002) The irreducible historicality of the concept of art. British Journal of Aesthetics 42(4):367–79. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.4.367.Google Scholar
Levinson, J. (2007) Aesthetic contextualism. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 4(3):1–12.Google Scholar
Lipton, P. (1991/2004) Inference to the best explanation. Routledge.Google Scholar
Livingston, P. (2003) Intention in art. In: The Oxford handbook of aesthetics, ed. Levinson, J., pp. 275–90. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locher, P. J. (2003) An empirical investigation of the visual rightness theory of picture perception. Acta Psychologica 114(2):147–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.07.001.Google Scholar
Locher, P. J. (2012) Empirical investigation of an aesthetic experience with art. In: Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience, ed. Shimamura, A. P. & Palmer, S. E., pp. 163–88. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locher, P. J., Overbeeke, K. & Stappers, P. J. (2005) Spatial balance of color triads in the abstract art of Piet Mondrian. Perception 34(2):169–89. DOI: 10.1068/p5033.Google Scholar
Lopes, D. M. (1996) Understanding pictures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lopes, D. M. (2002) Review of Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain by Semir Zeki. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60(4):365–66. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6245.00082.Google Scholar
Lopes, D. M. (2004) Directive pictures. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62(2):189–96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2003.00151.x.Google Scholar
Lopes, D. M. (2005) Sight and sensibility: Evaluating pictures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lopes, D. M. (2010) A philosophy of computer art. Routledge.Google Scholar
Machotka, P. (1966) Aesthetic criteria in childhood: Justifications of preference. Child Development 37(4):877–85.Google Scholar
MacLeod, S. (1999) The life of Haifisch. Broken Boulder Press.Google Scholar
Malevich, K. (1959) The non-objective world, trans. Dearstyne, H.. Theobold.Google Scholar
Margolis, E. & Laurence, S., eds. (2007) Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, J. (1980) Prospects for a science of aesthetic perception. In: Perceiving artworks, ed. Fisher, J., pp. 213–39. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, J. (2000) The deviant ontology of artworks. In: Theories of art today, ed. Carroll, N., pp. 109–29. The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Marinetti, F. T. (1909, 20 February) Manifeste du Futurisme, Le Figaro, p. 1.Google Scholar
Martin, L. J. (1906) An experimental study of Fechner's principles in aesthetics. Psychological Review 13:142–219. DOI:10.1037/h0076085.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1984) The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 5:49–80.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1990) The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Martindale, C., Moore, K. & Borkum, J. (1990) Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. American Journal of Psychology 103:53–80.Google Scholar
Matan, A. & Carey, S. (2001) Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts. Cognition 78(1):1–26. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00094-9.Google Scholar
McManus, I. C. (2006) Measuring the culture of C. P. Snow's Two Cultures . Empirical Studies of the Arts 24(2):219–27. DOI: 10.2190/5NM6-FV42-X38A-F3VP.Google Scholar
McManus, I. C., Cheema, B. & Stoker, J. (1993) The aesthetics of composition: A study of Mondrian. Empirical Studies of the Arts 11(2):83–94.Google Scholar
McWhinnie, H. J. (1968) A review on aesthetic measure. Acta Psychologica 28:363–75. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(68)90025-5.Google Scholar
Meskin, A. & Weinberg, J. M. (2003) Emotions, fiction, and cognitive architecture. The British Journal of Aesthetics 43(1):18–34. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.1.18.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1984) Culture and development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46:961–78.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984) Language, thought, and other biological categories. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (2004) Varieties of meaning. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mishkin, H. G. (1959) The published works of Giovanni Battista Sammartini: A bibliographical reappraisal. The Musical Quarterly 45(3):361–74. DOI: 10.1093/mq/XLV.3.361.Google Scholar
Morelli, G. (1880/1893) Italian masters in German galleries: A critical essay on the Italian pictures in the galleries of Munich, Dresden and Berlin, trans. Richter, L. M.. Bell.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., Nisbett, R. E. & Peng, K. (1995) Causal attribution across domains and cultures. In: Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, ed. Sperber, D., Premack, D. & Premack, A. J., pp. 577–613. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, A. (2003) The importance of being understood: Folk psychology as ethics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mras, G. P. (1966) Eugène Delacroix's theory of art. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Munro, T. (1951) Aesthetics as science: Its development in America. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9(3):161–207.Google Scholar
Munro, T. (1968) Evolution in the arts and other theories of culture history. The Cleveland Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Munro, T. (1970) Form and style in the arts: An introduction to aesthetic morphology. Press of Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. L. & Medin, D. L. (1985) The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review 92(3):289–316.Google Scholar
Newman, G. E. & Bloom, P. (2012) Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141(3):558–69. DOI: 10.1037/a0026035.Google Scholar
Nichols, S., ed. (2006) The architecture of the imagination: New essays on pretence, possibility, and fiction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. & Stich, S. P. (2003) Mindreading: An integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003) The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why. Free Press.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. (1988) The design of everyday things. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1981) Philosophical explanations. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. & Suci, G. J. (1955) Factor analysis of meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 50:325–38.Google Scholar
Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B. & Gardner, J. S. (2012) Hidden knowledge in aesthetic judgments: Preference for color and spatial composition. In: Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience, ed. Shimamura, A. & Palmer, S. E., pp. 189–222. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1955) Meaning in the visual arts: Papers in and on art history. Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1995) Three essays on style. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, G. & Carlson, A. (2008) Functional beauty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, M. J. (1987) How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of æsthetic experience. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peretz, I. (2006) The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition 100(1):1–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.004.Google Scholar
Peretz, I. & Coltheart, M. (2003) Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience 6(7):688–91. DOI: 10.1038/nn1083.Google Scholar
Petrie, B. (1974) Boccioni and Bergson. The Burlington Magazine 116(852):140–47.Google Scholar
Pickford, R. W. (1972) Psychology and visual aesthetics. Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Piliavin, I. M., Rodin, J. & Piliavin, J. A. (1969) Good Samaritanism: An underground phenomenon? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13:289–99.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1997) How the mind works. Norton.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2002) The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1962) The open society and its enemies, Vol. II, the high tide of prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the aftermath. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1957/1976) The poverty of historicism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pratt, C. C. (1961) Aesthetics. Annual Review of Psychology 12:71–92. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.12.020161.000443.Google Scholar
Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:515–26. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512.Google Scholar
Preston, B. (1998) Why is a wing like a spoon? A pluralist theory of function. The Journal of Philosophy 95(5):215–54.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975) Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999) Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(3):341–423.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1969) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. (2001) Sharpening up “The science of art.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(1):9–29.Google Scholar
Reber, R. (2008) Art in its experience: Can empirical psychology help assess artistic value? Leonardo 41(4):367–72. DOI: 10.1162/leon.2008.41.4.367.Google Scholar
Reber, R. (2012) Processing fluency, aesthetic pleasure, and culturally shared taste. In: Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience, ed. Shimamura, A. P. & Palmer, S. E., pp. 223–49. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reber, R., Schwarz, N. & Winkielman, P. (2004a) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8(4):364–82. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.Google Scholar
Reber, R., Wurtz, P. & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004b) Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition 13:47–60. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00049-7.Google Scholar
Reisenzein, R. (1986) A structural equation analysis of Weiner's attribution-affect model of helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(6):1123–33. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekoff, M. G. (1985) On reverse engineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-15(2):244–52. DOI: 10.1145/336512.336526.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (2006) The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 57(1):199–226. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.Google Scholar
Richter, H. (1998) Dada: Art and anti-art. Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Rips, L. J., Blok, S. & Newman, G. (2006) Tracing the identity of objects. Psychological Review 113(1):1–30. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.1.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1979) Expressing the way the world is: Expression as reference. Journal of Aesthetic Education 13(1):29–44.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1995) Startle. The Journal of Philosophy 92(2):53–74.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (2004) The art of distancing: How formal devices manage our emotional responses to literature. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62(2):153–62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00148.x.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (2005) Deeper than reason: Emotion and its role in literature, music, and art. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M. (1995) What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rollins, M. (2004) What Monet meant: Intention and attention in understanding art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62(2):175–88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00150.Google Scholar
Rollins, M., ed. (1993) Danto and his critics. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roskill, M. (1976/1989) What is art history? Second edition. The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Ross, L. (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In: Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10), ed. Berkowitz, L., pp. 173–220. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ruben, D.-H. (1990) Explaining explanation. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (1965) Situations, trans. Eisler, B.. Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, J.-M. (1999) Pourquoi la fiction? [Why fiction?] Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1990) Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1999) Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scharfstein, B.-A. (2009) Art without borders: A philosophical exploration of art and humanity. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schellekens, E. & Goldie, P. eds. (2011) The aesthetic mind: Philosophy and psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (1994) Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 26:123–62. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60153-7.Google Scholar
Shimamura, A. P. & Palmer, S. E., eds. (2012) Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1917/1965) Art as technique. In: Russian formalist criticism, ed. Lemon, L. T. & Reis, M. J., pp. 3–24. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Shultz, T. R. (1982) Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 47(1):1–51.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2005c) What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion 5:89–102. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2009) Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3:48–51.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2012) Human emotions and aesthetic experience: An overview of empirical aesthetics. In: Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience, ed. Shimamura, A. P. & Palmer, S. E., pp. 250–75. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skolnick, D. & Bloom, P. (2006) The intuitive cosmology of fictional worlds. In: The architecture of the imagination: New essays on pretence, possibility, and fiction, ed. Nichols, S., pp. 73–86. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skov, M. & Vartanian, O. (2009) Neuroaesthetics. Baywood.Google Scholar
Smith, J. D. & Melara, R. J. (1990) Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: 'Tis the gift to be simple. Cognition 34(3):279–98. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90007-7.Google Scholar
Smith, L. F. & Smith, J. K. (2006) The nature and growth of aesthetic fluency. In: New directions in aesthetics, creativity, and the psychology of art, ed. Locher, P., Martindale, C., Dorfman, L., Petrov, V. & Leontiev, D., pp. 47–58. Baywood.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. (1959) The two cultures. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solso, R. L. (1994) Cognition and the visual arts. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Song, H. & Schwarz, N. (2008a) Fluency and the detection of misleading questions: Low processing fluency attenuates the moses illusion. Social Cognition 26:791–99.Google Scholar
Song, H. & Schwarz, N. (2008b) If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science 19:986–88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (2007) A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge, Volume I. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Speer, J. H. (2010) Fundamentals of tree-ring research. University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2007) Seedless grapes. In: Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation, ed. Margolis, E. & Laurence, S., pp. 124–37, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (2002) Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language 17(1–2):3–23. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00186.Google Scholar
Stafford, B. M. (2007) Echo objects: The cognitive work of images. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stafford, B. M. (2011) A field guide to a new meta-field: Bridging the humanities-neurosciences divide. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, N. (2005) Fakes and forgeries. In: The Routledge companion to aesthetics, second edition, ed. Gaut, B. N. & Lopes, D. M., pp. 513–25. Routledge.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2009) Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In: In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, ed. Evans, J. S. B. T. & Frankish, K., pp. 55–88. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stecker, R. (2003) Value in art. In: The Oxford handbook of aesthetics, ed. Levinson, J., pp. 307–24. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (1955) Month in review: Fifteen years of Jackson Pollock. Arts 30(3):43–46.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2003) Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. (1995) Aesthetic properties of pictorial perception. Psychological Review 102(4):671–83.Google Scholar
Tanner, J., ed. (2003) The sociology of art: A reader. Routledge.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (2002) The passionate scientist: Emotion in scientific cognition. In: The cognitive basis of science, ed. Carruthers, P., Stich, S. & Siegal, M., pp. 235–50. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2001) Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts. SubStance 30(94/95):6–27. DOI: 10.1353/sub.2001.0017.Google Scholar
Topolinski, S. & Strack, F. (2009) The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence, and of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(1):39–63.Google Scholar
Ullman, S. (1984) Visual routines. Cognition 18:97–159. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90023-4.Google Scholar
Vasari, G. (1550/1991) The lives of the artists, Conaway Bondanella, J. & Bondanella, P., trans. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vermaas, P. E. & Houkes, W. (2003) Ascribing functions to technical artefacts: A challenge to etiological accounts of functions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54(2):261–89. DOI: 10.1093/bjps/54.2.261.Google Scholar
Walton, K. L. (1970) Categories of art. The Philosophical Review 79(3):334–67.Google Scholar
Walton, K. L. (1978) Fearing fictions. The Journal of Philosophy 75(1):5–27.Google Scholar
Walton, K. L. (1987) Style and the products and processes of art. In: The concept of style (second ed.), ed. Lang, B., pp. 72–103. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, K. L. (1990) Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, S., Sakamoto, J. & Wakita, M. (1995) Pigeons' discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior 63(165–74). DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-175.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (1980) A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:186–200.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (1990) The child's theory of mind. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Werness, H. B. (1983) Han van Meegeren fecit . In: The forger's art: Forgery and the philosophy of art, ed. Dutton, D., pp. 1–57. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. & Byrne, R. W. eds. (1997) Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitfield, S. (2000) Lucio fontana. University of Califonia Press.Google Scholar
Wilson Bareau, J. (2001) Manet by himself. Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J. (1756/1987) Reflections on the imitation of Greek works in painting and sculpture, ed. Heyer, E. & Norton, R. C., trans., Open Court.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J. (1972) Winckelmann: Writings on art, ed. Irwin, D. G.. Phaidon.Google Scholar
Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T. & Catty, S. (2006) Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science 17:799–806. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x.Google Scholar
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. & Reber, R. (2003) The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implication for evaluative judgment. In: The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, ed. Musch, J. & Klauer, K. C., pp. 189–217. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, H. (1920/1950) Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art, Hottinger, M. D., trans., Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. (1974) On art and the mind, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. (1980) Art and its objects, second edition with six supplementary essays. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. (1993) Danto's gallery of indiscernibles. In: Danto and his critics, ed. Rollins, M., pp. 28–38. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zacks, J. & Tversky, B. (2001) Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin 127(1):3–21.Google Scholar
Zeki, S. (1998) Art and the brain. Dædalus 127:71–103.Google Scholar
Zeki, S. & Lamb, M. (1994) The neurology of kinetic art. Brain 117:607–36.Google Scholar
Zizak, D. M. & Reber, A. S. (2004) Implicit preferences: The role(s) of familiarity in the structural mere exposure effect. Consciousness and Cognition 13:336–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2003.12.003.Google Scholar