Interfacility patient transfers contribute to the regional spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). We evaluated whether transfer patterns of inpatients with similar characteristics to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) case-patients (CRE surrogates) better reflect hospital-level CRE burden than traditionally used populations.

We determined the risk factors for subsequent hospital admission using demographic and clinical information from Tennessee Department of Health tracked CRE case-patients from July 2015 to September 2019. Risk factors were used to identify CRE surrogates among inpatients in the 2018 Tennessee Hospital Discharge Data System (HDDS). Transfer networks of CRE surrogates, Medicare/TennCare beneficiaries, and all-inpatients with ≤365 days of intervening community stays were compared with the transfer networks of CRE case-patients in 2019. The associations between hospital-level CRE prevalence and hospitals’ incoming transfer volumes from each network were assessed using negative binomial regression models.

Eight risk factors for subsequent hospital admission were identified from 2,518 CRE case-patients, which were used to match CRE case-patients with HDDS inpatients, resulting in 10,069 surrogate patients. CRE surrogate network showed more structural similarities with the CRE case-patient network than with the all-inpatient and Medicare/TennCare networks. A 33% increase in hospitals’ CRE prevalence in 2019 was associated with each doubling of incoming transfer of CRE surrogates in 2018 (adjusted Risk Ratio [aRR] 1.33, 95%CI: 1.1, 1.59), higher than all-inpatient (aRR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.51) and Medicare/TennCare networks (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.44).

Surrogate transfer patterns were associated with hospital-level CRE prevalence, highlighting their value in MDRO containment and prevention.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been associated with advanced epigenetic age cross-sectionally, but the association between these variables over time is unclear. This study conducted meta-analyses to test whether new-onset PTSD diagnosis and changes in PTSD symptom severity over time were associated with changes in two metrics of epigenetic aging over two time points.

We conducted meta-analyses of the association between change in PTSD diagnosis and symptom severity and change in epigenetic age acceleration/deceleration (age-adjusted DNA methylation age residuals as per the Horvath and GrimAge metrics) using data from 7 military and civilian cohorts participating in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium PTSD Epigenetics Workgroup (total N = 1,367).

Meta-analysis revealed that the interaction between Time 1 (T1) Horvath age residuals and new-onset PTSD over time was significantly associated with Horvath age residuals at T2 (meta β = 0.16, meta p = 0.02, p-adj = 0.03). The interaction between T1 Horvath age residuals and changes in PTSD symptom severity over time was significantly related to Horvath age residuals at T2 (meta β = 0.24, meta p = 0.05). No associations were observed for GrimAge residuals.

Results indicated that individuals who developed new-onset PTSD or showed increased PTSD symptom severity over time evidenced greater epigenetic age acceleration at follow-up than would be expected based on baseline age acceleration. This suggests that PTSD may accelerate biological aging over time and highlights the need for intervention studies to determine if PTSD treatment has a beneficial effect on the aging methylome.

CHD predisposes children to neurodevelopmental delays. Frequent, prolonged hospitalisations during infancy prevent children with heart disease from participating in recommended language and cognitive development programmes, such as outpatient early childhood literacy programmes, and contribute to caregiver stress, a risk factor for adverse developmental outcomes. This study aims to describe the implementation of a single-centre inpatient early childhood literacy programme for hospitalised infants with heart disease and assess its impact on reading practices and patient–family hospital experience.

Admitted infants ≤1 year old receive books, a calendar to track reading frequency, and reading guidance at regular intervals. Voluntary feedback is solicited from caregivers using an anonymous, QR-code survey on books. A prospective survey also assessed programme impact on hospital experience.

From February 2021 to November 2023, the Books@Heart programme provided 1,293 books to families of 840 infants, of whom 110 voluntarily submitted feedback. Caregivers reported a significant improvement in access to books (p < 0.001) and increased reading frequency after learning about Books@Heart (p = 0.003), with the proportion reading to their child daily increasing from 27% to 62%. Among 40 prospective survey responses, caregivers reported feeling a sense of personal fulfillment (60%), self-confidence (30%), connection (98%), and personal well-being (40%) while reading to their child.

An inpatient early childhood literacy programme is a well-received intervention for infants with heart disease that promotes development, improves book access, increases reading exposure, and engages families. Further studies are needed to assess its impact on sustained reading practices and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

We aimed to systematically review primary studies exploring workplace bullying of psychiatric trainees, including rates, forms of bullying, perpetrators and help-seeking. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase using PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criterion was primary research papers surveying or interviewing psychiatry trainees with respect to perceived workplace bullying by staff members. Exclusion criteria were secondary research papers and papers whose only focus was bullying by patients or carers.

Substantial levels of bullying were reported in all five included studies. Perpetrators were often reported to be consultants, managers or peers. Most trainees did not obtain help for bullying and harassment. All of the studies had methodological limitations.

Concerning levels of workplace bullying have been reported by psychiatric trainees in the UK and abroad. Further methodologically robust studies are required to evaluate the current levels and nature of this bullying, and strategies to prevent and manage it.

We aim to analyze the efficacy and safety of TMS on cognition in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), AD-related dementias, and nondementia conditions with comorbid cognitive impairment.

Systematic review, Meta-Analysis

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane database, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 1, 2000, to February 9, 2023.

RCTs, open-label, and case series studies reporting cognitive outcomes following TMS intervention were included.

Cognitive and safety outcomes were measured. Cochrane Risk of Bias for RCTs and MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria were used to evaluate study quality. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022326423).

The systematic review included 143 studies (n = 5,800 participants) worldwide, encompassing 94 RCTs, 43 open-label prospective, 3 open-label retrospective, and 3 case series. The meta-analysis included 25 RCTs in MCI and AD. Collectively, these studies provide evidence of improved global and specific cognitive measures with TMS across diagnostic groups. Only 2 studies (among 143) reported 4 adverse events of seizures: 3 were deemed TMS unrelated and another resolved with coil repositioning. Meta-analysis showed large effect sizes on global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination (SMD = 0.80 [0.26, 1.33], p = 0.003), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD = 0.85 [0.26, 1.44], p = 0.005), Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (SMD = −0.96 [−1.32, −0.60], p < 0.001)) in MCI and AD, although with significant heterogeneity.

The reviewed studies provide favorable evidence of improved cognition with TMS across all groups with cognitive impairment. TMS was safe and well tolerated with infrequent serious adverse events.

Deficits in visual-motor coordination and/or fine motor dexterity are often present in pediatric neurological and neurodevelopmental conditions and may adversely affect performance on tests with motor demands. This consideration is relevant when interpreting discrepant scores across Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) Processing Speed Index (PSI) subtests, specifically Symbol Search and the more motorically demanding Coding. Although test developers maintain that motor ability is unlikely to significantly impact Coding performances, clinicians often consider whether uneven WISC-V PSI subtest scores (Coding<Symbol Search) may in part be attributed to motor-related difficulties, when indicated. This has important clinical implications, as WISC-V Coding may then be omitted or substituted when calculating FSIQ. Thus, the present study aims to evaluate the role of motor task deficits in uneven PSI subtest scores in a sample of clinic-referred youth.

Participants were 238 children and adolescents (MAge=10.62 years; 65.5% male; 60.5% white) referred for neuropsychological assessment. All participants completed the Coding and Symbol Search subtests of the WISC-V and at least one of two motor tasks: the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) and the Grooved Pegboard (GP). To evaluate patterns of functioning, we determined the frequencies of patients who demonstrated uneven PSI subtest performances (defined in this study as a Coding scaled score [ss] at least 3-points lower than that of Symbol Search) and/or normative weaknesses (i.e., Standard Score [SS] below 80, per recommendations from the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology) on motor tasks. A chi-square test of independence was used to evaluate associations between uneven PSI performance and the presence/absence of motor weaknesses. Among those with uneven PSI performance, a one-way ANOVA was used to examine whether PSI subtest difference scores varied as a function of motor performance group (No Weakness=0, VMI Weakness Only=1, GP Weakness Only=2, Weaknesses on Both=3).

Of the 238 participants, 28 (11.0%) displayed normative weaknesses on the VMI only, 43 (16.9%) displayed weaknesses on the dominant-GP only, and 18 (7.1%) displayed weaknesses on both tasks. On the WISC-V, 56 participants (23.5%) exhibited uneven PSI subtest performance (Coding<Symbol Search), with 21 (37.5%) of those participants displaying at least one normative motor weakness. Chi-square analyses indicated no significant association between the presence/absence of motor skill weakness and uneven PSI subtest performance, (X2 (3) = 5.79, p = .122). Among those with uneven PSI performance, Coding/Symbol Search difference scores were not significantly associated with motor performance group (F(3,55) = 1.26, p = .297).

These findings suggest that while patients with uneven WISC-V Coding and Symbol Search scores may also display motor task deficits, these deficits are not significantly associated with uneven performances overall. Additionally, of the participants with uneven PSI subtest scores, the majority did not exhibit normative weaknesses on motor tasks. Therefore, clinicians may be overcorrecting for a motoric cause of uneven performance and underappreciating the potential unevenness a child demonstrates in processing speed. Future studies should evaluate the role of other neurocognitive factors, such as working memory, in this score discrepancy pattern.

Frequent and remote cognitive assessment may improve sensitivity to subtle cognitive decline associated with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of repeated remote memory assessment in late middle-aged and older adults.

We recruited participants from a longitudinal aging cohort to complete three medial temporal lobe-based memory paradigms (Object-In-Room Recall [ORR], Mnemonic Discrimination for Objects and Scenes [MDT-OS], Complex Scene Recognition [CSR]) using the neotiv application at repeated intervals over one year. We conducted initial telephone calls to perform screening, consent, and download instructions. Participants were assigned 24 remote sessions on a smartphone or tablet and were alerted via push notification when an assignment was ready to complete. Participants were randomly assigned to: (1) complete memory tests every other week or (2) complete memory tests for multiple days within one week every other month. Each remote session lasts approximately 10 minutes and includes one memory paradigm and brief usability/acceptability questionnaires followed by a delayed retrieval session 90 minutes later. Feasibility metrics examined included participation, retention, compliance, and usability/acceptability.

Of 150 participants recruited, 113 consented and were enrolled into the study (participation rate = 75%). Current retention rate is 75%, with 85/113 currently active (n=73) or completed (n=12). Of the 85 active or completed participants, the mean age is 68.7 (range = 4882), 64% are women, 70% used a smartphone (30% tablet), 84 are cognitively unimpaired and 1 has mild cognitive impairment. The primary threat to retention was participants consenting into the study but never registering in the app or completing their first scheduled assignment. After enrollment, 130 telephone calls were made by study staff to facilitate registration into the app or to remind participants to complete tasks. 74-80% of participants completed delayed retrieval tasks within 30 minutes of push notification, but average retrieval time was 125137 minutes post-learning trials. Regarding acceptability/usability, 94% agreed the application was easy to use, 56% enjoyed completing the mobile memory tests (36% felt neutral), 40% prefer remote mobile memory tests to standard in-person paper and pencil tests, and 50% understood the test instructions. 87% felt the frequency of tests assigned was “just right” (13% “too often”) and 90% felt the test length was “just right” (7% too short, 3% too long). Participants who completed all 24 sessions to date (n=12) all endorsed being “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the platform and visit schedule, as well as recommended continued use of this type of cognitive testing.

Remote memory assessment using smartphones and tablets is feasible and acceptable for cognitively unimpaired late middle-aged and older adults. Follow-up by study staff was needed to ensure adequate retention. Comprehension of instructions and compliance with completing delayed retrieval tasks within the expected timeframe was lower than expected. These feedback will be incorporated into an updated version of the app to improve compliance and retention. Longitudinal data collection is ongoing and results will be updated with a larger sample. Results will be compared across frequency schedule groups.

Hypertension is a common disorder that has been inconsistently associated with worse cognition in older adults. Antihypertensive medications offer treatment for high blood pressure but previous studies on the association between blood pressure, antihypertensive use, and cognitive performance in older adults have yielded inconsistent findings. Individuals without high blood pressure may also take antihypertensive medications for other medical conditions, including migraines. It is unclear whether antihypertensive medications have any effect on cognitive performance in older adults, and whether the differences, if any, are similar in hypertensives and normotensives.

4,969 participants from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center (NACC) database were included in this study (Mage=72.4 years, SD=7.3 years). Cognitive assessment included Letter Fluency, Category Fluency (animals and vegetables), Trail Making Test A & B, Digit Ordering (forward and backward), and MoCA total score. Participants were included if they had a clinician diagnosis of hypertension or normotension and recorded history of whether they take any antihypertensive medication. Participants with a history of stroke were excluded. Cognitive differences between medication groups were investigated in hypertensive participants and normotensive participants using Bayesian Mann-Whitney tests.

Bayesian Mann-Whitney tests in hypertensive individuals showed no cognitive differences between those taking antihypertensive medications and those not taking antihypertensives (all BF10s < 3). Bayesian Mann-Whitney tests in normotensive individuals showed individuals taking antihypertensive medications performed worse on Trail Making Test B compared to individuals not taking antihypertensives (123.6 seconds vs 108.8 seconds; BF10 = 35.1), with a small effect size (d=-.156).

These results suggest that antihypertensive use in older adults with normal blood pressure may be associated with worse executive functioning. Antihypertensive use in normotensive older adults may lower blood pressure and reduce cerebral perfusion, resulting in worse cognitive functioning. Future studies should investigate long-term antihypertensive use and associated cognitive changes in both hypertensive and normotensive individuals.

Continuous performance tests (CPT) are often considered the gold standard for the diagnosis attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), particularly when parent and teacher rating scales are inconclusive. Prior work has indicated that CPT can also help differentiate between ADHD subtypes. However, the ability of CPT to differentiate ADHD subtype has not been examined among youth with comorbid ADHD and anxiety (ADHD+A). This is particularly concerning as the extant literature suggests that anxiety symptoms may exacerbate deficits associated with ADHD (e.g.. , working memory, attention) and attenuate others (e.g., inhibition); thus, anxiety may influence expected patterns on the CPT. This study therefore seeks to examine the role of ADHD subtype on the relationship between ADHD+A and performance on a CPT among youth with ADHD+A.

Participants included 54 children ranging from 6 to 20 years old (Mage=11.83, 54% female) who were diagnosed with ADHD+A via neuropsychological evaluation. In terms of ADHD subtype, 51.9% (n=28) were diagnosed with ADHD combined or ADHD primarily hyperactive and 48.1% (n=26) were diagnosed with ADHD primarily inattentive. Approximately 46.30% (N=25) of participants were medication naive. Analyses were conducted using data from the Conners Kiddie Continuous Performance Test -Second Edition (KCPT-2), Conners Continuous Performance - Second Edition (CPT-2) and the Conners Continuous Performance - Third Edition (CPT-3), which are part of the same family of performance-based attention measures. Independent samples t-tests were conducted to examine performance differences in aspects of attention (e.g., inattentiveness, sustained attention) and hyperactivity (e.g., impulsivity, inhibition).

ADHD subtype was not significantly related to measures of inattentiveness. This includes the number of targets missed (omissions; (t(39)=-.532, p=.59)) and variability in response time (variability; (t(39)=-0.30, p=.77)). In terms of sustained attention, ADHD subtype was not related to variability in response speed across blocks (Hit SEBC/HRT Block Change; (t(39)=-0.26, p=.79)). Importantly, these results were consistent regardless of ADHD medication status. ADHD subtype was also not significantly related to impulsivity. This includes responses to nontargets (commissions; (t(39)=-1.05, p=.30)), random or anticipatory responding (perseverations; (t(39)=-0.19, p=.85)), and mean response speed of correct responses (HR; (t(39)=-0.72, p=.48)).

The extant literature suggests that CPT can help clinicians differentiate between ADHD subtypes. However, the results of this study indicate that there are no performance differences on the CPT among youth with comorbid ADHD and anxiety. There are several limitations to consider. First, this study had a relatively small sample size, which also limited the ability to examine ADHD primarily hyperactive/impulsive as a distinct subtype. Additionally, this study did not examine the effect of individual anxiety disorders (i.e., generalized anxiety disorder, specific phobias). Finally, these findings may not generalize to other standardized measures of attention or more ecologically valid measures. Despite these limitations, this study is an important step in understanding the relationship between ADHD+A and performance on attention measures. Clinicians should be cautious in using results from CPT to distinguish between ADHD subtype among children with comorbid anxiety.

Despite the importance of timing of nerve surgery after peripheral nerve injury, optimal timing of intervention has not been clearly delineated. The goal of this study is to explore factors that may have a significant impact on clinical outcomes of severe peripheral nerve injury that requires reconstruction with nerve transfer or graft.

Adult patients who underwent peripheral nerve transfer or grafting in Alberta were reviewed. Clustered multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of time to surgery, type of nerve repair, and patient characteristics on strength outcomes. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis model was used to examine factors correlated with increased time to surgery.

Of the 163 patients identified, the median time to surgery was 212 days. For every week of delay, the adjusted odds of achieving Medical Research Council strength grade ≥ 3 decreases by 3%. An increase in preinjury comorbidities was associated with longer overall time to surgery (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.95). Referrals made by surgeons were associated with a shorter time to surgery compared to general practitioners (aHR 1.87, 95% CI 1.14–3.06). In patients treated with nerve transfer, the adjusted odds of achieving antigravity strength was 388% compared to nerve grafting; while the adjusted odds decreased by 65% if the injury sustained had a pre-ganglionic injury component.

Mitigating delays in surgical intervention is crucial to optimizing outcomes. The nature of initial nerve injury and surgical reconstructive techniques are additional important factors that impact postoperative outcomes.

Word list-learning tasks are commonly used to evaluate auditory-verbal learning and memory. However, different frequencies of word usage, subtle meaning nuances, unique word phonology, and different preexisting associations among words make translation across languages difficult. We administered lists of consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) nonword trigrams to independent American and Italian young adult samples. We evaluated whether an auditory list-learning task using CVC nonword trigrams instead of words could be applied cross-culturally to evaluate similar learning and associative memory processes.

Seventy-five native English-speaking (USA) and 104 native Italian-speaking (Italy) university students were administered 15-item lists of CVC trigrams using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test paradigm with five study-test trials, an interference trial, and short- and long-term delayed recall. Bayesian t tests and mixed-design ANOVAs contrasted the primary learning indexes across the two samples and biological sex.

Performance was comparable between nationalities on all primary memory indices except the interference trial (List B), where the Italian group recalled approximately one item more than the American sample. For both nationalities, recall increased across the five learning trials and declined significantly on the postinterference trial, demonstrating susceptibility to retroactive interference. No effects of sex, age, vocabulary, or depressive symptoms were observed.

Using lists of unfamiliar nonword CVC trigrams, Italian and American younger adults showed a similar performance pattern across immediate and delayed recall trials. Whereas word list-learning performance is typically affected by cultural, demographic, mood, and cognitive factors, this trigram list-learning task does not show such effects, demonstrating its utility for cross-cultural memory assessment.