Patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exhibit smaller regional brain volumes in commonly reported regions including the amygdala and hippocampus, regions associated with fear and memory processing. In the current study, we have conducted a voxel-based morphometry (VBM) meta-analysis using whole-brain statistical maps with neuroimaging data from the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD working group.

T1-weighted structural neuroimaging scans from 36 cohorts (PTSD n = 1309; controls n = 2198) were processed using a standardized VBM pipeline (ENIGMA-VBM tool). We meta-analyzed the resulting statistical maps for voxel-wise differences in gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes between PTSD patients and controls, performed subgroup analyses considering the trauma exposure of the controls, and examined associations between regional brain volumes and clinical variables including PTSD (CAPS-4/5, PCL-5) and depression severity (BDI-II, PHQ-9).

PTSD patients exhibited smaller GM volumes across the frontal and temporal lobes, and cerebellum, with the most significant effect in the left cerebellum (Hedges’ g = 0.22, pcorrected = .001), and smaller cerebellar WM volume (peak Hedges’ g = 0.14, pcorrected = .008). We observed similar regional differences when comparing patients to trauma-exposed controls, suggesting these structural abnormalities may be specific to PTSD. Regression analyses revealed PTSD severity was negatively associated with GM volumes within the cerebellum (pcorrected = .003), while depression severity was negatively associated with GM volumes within the cerebellum and superior frontal gyrus in patients (pcorrected = .001).

PTSD patients exhibited widespread, regional differences in brain volumes where greater regional deficits appeared to reflect more severe symptoms. Our findings add to the growing literature implicating the cerebellum in PTSD psychopathology.

Port-a-caths are implanted intravascular chest ports that enable venous access. With more port placements performed by interventional radiologists, it is important to discern differences in infection and complication rates between double- and single-lumen ports.

We retrospectively reviewed 1,385 port placements over 2 years at the University of Miami. Patients were grouped by single- or double-lumen ports. Data on duration of catheter stay, bloodstream infections, malfunctions, and other complications (fibrin sheath, thrombosis, catheter malposition) were collected. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify variables predicting port infection.

The mean patient age was 58.8 years; the mean BMI was 26.9 kg/m2; and 61.5% of these patients were female. Our search revealed 791 double-lumen ports (57.1%) and 594 single-lumen ports (42.9%). The median follow-up was 668 days (range, 2–1,297). Double-lumen ports were associated with significantly higher rates of bacteremia (2.78% vs 0.84%; P = .02), port malfunction (8.3% vs 2.0%; P < .001), fibrin sheath formation (2.2% vs 0.5%; P < .02), catheter tip malposition (1.0% vs 0; P = .01), and catheter-associated thrombosis (1.4% vs 0; P = .003). Multivariate Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for other variables, showed that double-lumen chest ports had 2.98 times (95% confidence interval, 1.12–7.94) the hazard rate of single-lumen ports for developing bloodstream infection (P = .029).

Double-lumen chest ports are associated with increased risk for bloodstream infection, malfunction, fibrin sheath formation, catheter tip malposition, and catheter-associated thrombosis. Interventional radiologists may consider placing single-lumen ports if clinically feasible; however, future studies are needed to determine clinical significance. The study limitations included the retrospective study design and the potential loss of patient follow-up.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is an important public health problem, due to its high incidence and the failure of at least 20% of patients to successfully recover from injury. Cognitive symptoms, in particular, are an important area of research in mTBI, due to their association with return to work and referral to neuropsychological services. Understanding the predictors of cognitive symptoms may help to improve outcomes after mTBI. This study explored female sex, psychological distress, coping style and illness perceptions as potential predictors of cognitive symptoms following adult civilian mTBI.

Sixty-nine premorbidly healthy adults with mTBI (mean age = 36.7, SD = 14.7, range = 18-60; 15 females) were recruited from trauma wards at two public hospitals in Australia and assessed 6-12 weeks following injury. Cognitive complaint was measured using a comprehensive 30-item scale (CCAMCHI) assessing mTBI-specific symptoms in the domains of processing speed, attention, memory and executive function. Participants additionally completed the following measures: Brief-COPE, Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised, Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5. The latter three measures were combined to create an index of psychological distress.

Bivariate nonparametric correlational analyses indicated that female sex (r[67] = .26, 95% CI [.14, .55], p = .03) and psychological distress (r[66] = .54, 95% CI [.40, .72], p < .001) were each significantly associated with cognitive symptom reporting following mTBI. Additionally, while none of the three coping style factors were associated with cognitive symptom reporting, seven of the eight dimensions of illness perceptions were associated with symptom reporting (|r| = .25 - .58, p < 0.05). In a linear regression model assessing the combined effects of each variable, female sex, greater psychological distress, and overall negative illness perceptions were each significant independent predictors of increased cognitive complaint (adj. R2 = .47, F[4,63] = 15.59, p < .001).

These findings implicate female sex, psychological distress, and illness perceptions as key factors associated with cognitive symptom reporting after mTBI. This research suggests that these factors may be useful in clinical practice when considering early identification of individuals at risk of poor recovery. Specifically, this research implicates females, individuals with high psychological distress, and individuals with negative illness perceptions as important to subgroups to consider for potential intervention after mTBI. Additionally, as psychological distress and illness perceptions are both potentially modifiable, this research suggests that these factors may be useful targets for intervention.