We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The interaction of helminth infections with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been a major area of research in the past few years. This paper, therefore, focuses on the systematic review of the effects of helminthic infections on metabolism and immune regulation related to T2D, with mechanisms through which both direct and indirect effects are mediated. Specifically, the possible therapeutic role of helminths in T2D management, probably mediated through the modulation of host metabolic pathways and immune responses, is of special interest. This paper discusses the current possibilities for translating helminth therapy from basic laboratory research to clinical application, as well as existing and future challenges. Although preliminary studies suggest the potential for helminth therapy for T2D patients, their safety and efficacy still need to be confirmed by larger-scale clinical studies.
Patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exhibit smaller regional brain volumes in commonly reported regions including the amygdala and hippocampus, regions associated with fear and memory processing. In the current study, we have conducted a voxel-based morphometry (VBM) meta-analysis using whole-brain statistical maps with neuroimaging data from the ENIGMA-PGC PTSD working group.
Methods
T1-weighted structural neuroimaging scans from 36 cohorts (PTSD n = 1309; controls n = 2198) were processed using a standardized VBM pipeline (ENIGMA-VBM tool). We meta-analyzed the resulting statistical maps for voxel-wise differences in gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes between PTSD patients and controls, performed subgroup analyses considering the trauma exposure of the controls, and examined associations between regional brain volumes and clinical variables including PTSD (CAPS-4/5, PCL-5) and depression severity (BDI-II, PHQ-9).
Results
PTSD patients exhibited smaller GM volumes across the frontal and temporal lobes, and cerebellum, with the most significant effect in the left cerebellum (Hedges’ g = 0.22, pcorrected = .001), and smaller cerebellar WM volume (peak Hedges’ g = 0.14, pcorrected = .008). We observed similar regional differences when comparing patients to trauma-exposed controls, suggesting these structural abnormalities may be specific to PTSD. Regression analyses revealed PTSD severity was negatively associated with GM volumes within the cerebellum (pcorrected = .003), while depression severity was negatively associated with GM volumes within the cerebellum and superior frontal gyrus in patients (pcorrected = .001).
Conclusions
PTSD patients exhibited widespread, regional differences in brain volumes where greater regional deficits appeared to reflect more severe symptoms. Our findings add to the growing literature implicating the cerebellum in PTSD psychopathology.
Background: TERT promoter mutation (TPM) is an established biomarker in meningiomas associated with aberrant TERT expression and reduced progression-free survival (PFS). TERT expression, however, has also been observed even in tumours with wildtype TERT promoters (TP-WT). This study aimed to examine TERT expression and clinical outcomes in meningiomas. Methods: TERT expression, TPM status, and TERT promoter methylation of a multi-institutional cohort of meningiomas (n=1241) was assessed through nulk RNA sequencing (n=604), Sanger sequencing of the promoter (n=1095), and methylation profiling (n=1218). 380 Toronto meningiomas were used for discovery, and 861 external institution samples were compiled as a validation cohort. Results: Both TPMs and TERTpromoter methylation were associated with increased TERT expression and may represent independent mechanisms of TERT reactivation. TERT expression was detected in 30.4% of meningiomas that lacked TPMs, was associated with higher WHO grades, and corresponded to shorter PFS, independent of grade and even among TP-WT tumours. TERT expression was associated with a shorter PFS equivalent to those of TERT-negative meningiomas of one higher grade. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the prognostic significance of TERT expression in meningiomas, even in the absence of TPMs. Its presence may identify patients who may progress earlier and should be considered in risk stratification models.
Background: Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors. Radiotherapy (RT) serves as an adjunct following surgical resection; however, response varies. RTOG-0539 is a prospective, phase 2, trial that stratified patients risk groups based on clinical and pathological criteria, providing key benchmarks for RT outcomes. This is the first study that aims to characterize the molecular landscape of an RT clinical trial in meningiomas. Methods: Tissue from 100 patients was analyzed using DNA methylation, RNA sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Copy number variations and mutational profiles were assessed to determine associations with meningioma aggressiveness. Tumors were molecularly classified and pathway analyses were conducted to identify biological processes associated with RT response. Results: High-risk meningiomas exhibited cell cycle dysregulation and hypermetabolic pathway upregulation. 1p loss and 1q gain were more frequent in aggressive meningiomas, and NF2 and non-NF2 mutations co-occurred in some high-risk tumors. Molecular findings led to the reclassification of several cases, highlighting the limitations of histopathologic grading alone. Conclusions: This is the first study to comprehensively characterize the molecular landscape of any RT trial in meningioma, integrating multi-omic data to refine treatment stratification. Findings align with ongoing genomically driven meningioma clinical trials and underscore the need for prospective tissue banking to enhance biomarker-driven treatment strategies.
Background: The WHO grade of meningioma was updated in 2021 to include homozygous deletions of CDKN2A/B and TERT promotor mutations. Previous work including the recent cIMPACT-NOW statement have discussed the potential value of including chromosomal copy number alterations to help refine the current grading system. Methods: Chromosomal copy number profiles were inferred from from 1964 meningiomas using DNA methylation. Regularized Cox regresssion was used to identify CNAs independenly associated with post-surgical and post-RT PFS. Outcomes were stratified by WHO grade and novel CNAs to assess their potential value in WHO critiera. Results: Patients with WHO grade 1 tumours and chromosome 1p loss had similar outcomes to those with WHO grade 2 tumours (median PFS 5.83 [95% CI 4.36-Inf] vs 4.48 [4.09-5.18] years). Those with chromosome 1p loss and 1q gain had similar outcomes to those with WHO grade 3 cases regardless of initial grade (median PFS 2.23 [1.28-Inf] years WHO grade 1, 1.90 [1.23-2.25] years WHO grade 2, compared to 2.27 [1.68-3.05] years in WHO grade 3 cases overall). Conclusions: We advocate for chromosome 1p loss being added as a criterion for a CNS WHO grade of 2 meningioma and addition of 1q gain as a criterion for a CNS WHO grade of 3.
Background: We previously developed a DNA methylation-based risk predictor for meningioma, which has been used locally in a prospective fashion. As a follow-up, we validate this model using a large prospective cohort and introduce a streamlined next-generation model compatible with newer methylation arrays. Methods: The performance of our next-generation predictor was compared with our original model and standard-of-care 2021 WHO grade using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves. A nomogram was generated by incorporating our methylation predictor with WHO grade and extent of resection. Results: A total of 1347 meningioma cases were utilized in the study, including 469 prospective cases from 3 institutions and a retrospective cohort of 100 WHO grade 2 cases for model validation. Both the original and next-generation models significantly outperformed 2021 WHO grade in predicting postoperative recurrence. Dichotomizing into grade-specific risk subgroups was predictive of outcome within both WHO grades 1 and 2 tumours (log-rank p<0.05). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk cases specifically, reinforcing its informative role in clinical decision making. Conclusions: This next-generation DNA methylation-based meningioma outcome predictor significantly outperforms 2021 WHO grading in predicting time to recurrence. This will help improve prognostication and inform patient selection for RT.
Background: Meningiomas exhibit considerable heterogeneity. We previously identified four distinct molecular groups (immunogenic, NF2-wildtype, hypermetabolic, proliferative) which address much of this heterogeneity. Despite their utility, the stochasticity of clustering methods and the requirement of multi-omics data limits the potential for classifying cases in the clinical setting. Methods: Using an international cohort of 1698 meningiomas, we constructed and validated a machine learning-based molecular classifier using DNA methylation alone. Original and newly-predicted molecular groups were compared using DNA methylation, RNA sequencing, whole exome sequencing, and clinical outcomes. Results: Group-specific outcomes in the validation cohort were nearly identical to those originally described, with median PFS of 7.4 (4.9-Inf) years in hypermetabolic tumors and 2.5 (2.3-5.3) years in proliferative tumors (not reached in the other groups). Predicted NF2-wildtype cases had no NF2 mutations, and 51.4% had others mutations previously described in this group. RNA pathway analysis revealed upregulation of immune-related pathways in the immunogenic group, metabolic pathways in the hypermetabolic group and cell-cycle programs in the proliferative group. Bulk deconvolution similarly revealed enrichment of macrophages in immunogenic tumours and neoplastic cells in hypermetabolic/proliferative tumours. Conclusions: Our DNA methylation-based classifier faithfully recapitulates the biology and outcomes of the original molecular groups allowing for their widespread clinical implementation.
Background: The combination of PARP inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been proposed as a potentially synergistic combinatorial treatment in IDH mutant glioma, targeting dysregulated homologous recombination repair pathways. This study analyzed the cell-free DNA methylome of patients in a phase 2 trial using the PARP inhibitor Olaparib and the PD-1 inhibitor Durvalumab. Methods: Patients with recurrent high-grade IDH-mutant gliomas were enrolled in a phase II open-label study (NCT03991832). Serum was collected at baseline and monthly and cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) was performed. Binomial GLMnet models were developed and model performance was assessed using validation set data. Results: 29 patients were enrolled between 2020–2023. Patients received olaparib 300mg twice daily and durvalumab 1500mg IV every 4 weeks. The overall response rate was 10% via RANO criteria. 144 plasma samples were profiled with cfMeDIP-seq along with 30 healthy controls. The enriched circulating tumour DNA methylome during response periods exhibited a highly specific signature, accurately discriminating response versus failure (AUC 0.98 ± 0.03). Additionally, samples that were taken while on treatment were able to be discriminated from samples off therapy (AUC 0.74 ± 0.11). Conclusions: The cell-free plasma DNA methylome exhibits highly specific signatures that enable accurate prediction of response to therapy.
We report on an experience with impostor research participants, people who misrepresent themselves, and identify characteristics that can be used by investigators to screen out such participants. We compare the responses of impostor and valid participants, showing that impostors meaningfully change qualitative study findings with implications for policy interventions or follow-on research informed by the study. It is important for investigators to be alert to the potential for impostor participants and plan their research accordingly.
Patients with cancer frequently experience insomnia that significantly impacts their quality of life, worsens existing symptoms, and potentially hinders treatment outcomes and recovery. Here, we report on 3 cancer patients whose insomnia was improved with low-dose olanzapine.
Methods
A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for 3 cancer patients experiencing insomnia treated with olanzapine at Johns Hopkins Hospital. The data collection included the type of cancer diagnosis, the level of insomnia severity experienced by individuals, and treatment results and outcome.
Results
Olanzapine improved sleep in all 3 patients and decreased nausea/vomiting and anxiety in patients 2 and 3.
Significance of results
A low dose of olanzapine has potential to treat insomnia in cancer patients. The ideal dosing regimens and potential risks are unclear, especially for long-term use. More research and clinical trials are needed to evaluate off-label use of olanzapine for insomnia, including its efficacy and risks, and to optimize the dosage to reduce its side effects in cancer patients. Oncology providers should consider olanzapine as a potential treatment for insomnia, especially given its off-label uses and potential benefits.
To compare the sound localisation abilities of bimodal cochlear implant and bilateral cochlear implant users.
Methods
A horizontal sound source discrimination task was conducted with 44 and 20 bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users, respectively. Paired and two-sample t-tests were performed for paired and unpaired data, respectively.
Results
The root mean square error scores of the bimodal cochlear implant and bilateral cochlear implant users were 75.77 ± 10.49° and 54.39 ± 19.82°, respectively. The bilateral cochlear implant users’ root mean square error score was significantly better than that of the bimodal cochlear implant users (t = 5.65, p < 0.001). The root mean square error scores of bimodal cochlear implant users with good and poor low-frequency hearing were 75.45 ± 11.07° and 76.10 ± 10.14°, respectively, with no significant intergroup difference (t = 0.20, p = 0.84).
Conclusion
Bilateral cochlear implantation may be more helpful for sound localisation in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The better low-frequency hearing threshold of the non-implanted ears did not result in better sound localisation ability in bimodal cochlear implant users.
Artificial intelligence is dramatically reshaping scientific research and is coming to play an essential role in scientific and technological development by enhancing and accelerating discovery across multiple fields. This book dives into the interplay between artificial intelligence and the quantum sciences; the outcome of a collaborative effort from world-leading experts. After presenting the key concepts and foundations of machine learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence, its applications in quantum chemistry and physics are presented in an accessible way, enabling readers to engage with emerging literature on machine learning in science. By examining its state-of-the-art applications, readers will discover how machine learning is being applied within their own field and appreciate its broader impact on science and technology. This book is accessible to undergraduates and more advanced readers from physics, chemistry, engineering, and computer science. Online resources include Jupyter notebooks to expand and develop upon key topics introduced in the book.
This study explored mental workload recognition methods for carrier-based aircraft pilots utilising multiple sensor physiological signal fusion and portable devices. A simulation carrier-based aircraft flight experiment was designed, and subjective mental workload scores and electroencephalogram (EEG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals from six pilot cadets were collected using NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and portable devices. The subjective scores of the pilots in three flight phases were used to label the data into three mental workload levels. Features from the physiological signals were extracted, and the interrelations between mental workload and physiological indicators were evaluated. Machine learning and deep learning algorithms were used to classify the pilots’ mental workload. The performances of the single-modal method and multimodal fusion methods were investigated. The results showed that the multimodal fusion methods outperformed the single-modal methods, achieving higher accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score. Among all the classifiers, the random forest classifier with feature-level fusion obtained the best results, with an accuracy of 97.69%, precision of 98.08%, recall of 96.98% and F1 score of 97.44%. The findings of this study demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method, offering insights into mental workload management and the enhancement of flight safety for carrier-based aircraft pilots.
The theory of kernels offers a rich mathematical framework for the archetypical tasks of classification and regression. Its core insight consists of the representer theorem that asserts that an unknown target function underlying a dataset can be represented by a finite sum of evaluations of a singular function, the so-called kernel function. Together with the infamous kernel trick that provides a practical way of incorporating such a kernel function into a machine learning method, a plethora of algorithms can be made more versatile. This chapter first introduces the mathematical foundations required for understanding the distinguished role of the kernel function and its consequence in terms of the representer theorem. Afterwards, we show how selected popular algorithms, including Gaussian processes, can be promoted to their kernel variant. In addition, several ideas on how to construct suitable kernel functions are provided, before demonstrating the power of kernel methods in the context of quantum (chemistry) problems.
In this chapter, we change our viewpoint and focus on how physics can influence machine learning research. In the first part, we review how tools of statistical physics can help to understand key concepts in machine learning such as capacity, generalization, and the dynamics of the learning process. In the second part, we explore yet another direction and try to understand how quantum mechanics and quantum technologies could be used to solve data-driven task. We provide an overview of the field going from quantum machine learning algorithms that can be run on ideal quantum computers to kernel-based and variational approaches that can be run on current noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices.
In this chapter, we introduce the field of reinforcement learning and some of its most prominent applications in quantum physics and computing. First, we provide an intuitive description of the main concepts, which we then formalize mathematically. We introduce some of the most widely used reinforcement learning algorithms. Starting with temporal-difference algorithms and Q-learning, followed by policy gradient methods and REINFORCE, and the interplay of both approaches in actor-critic algorithms. Furthermore, we introduce the projective simulation algorithm, which deviates from the aforementioned prototypical approaches and has multiple applications in the field of physics. Then, we showcase some prominent reinforcement learning applications, featuring some examples in games; quantum feedback control; quantum computing, error correction and information; and the design of quantum experiments. Finally, we discuss some potential applications and limitations of reinforcement learning in the field of quantum physics.
This chapter discusses more specialized examples on how machine learning can be used to solve problems in quantum sciences. We start by explaining the concept of differentiable programming and its use cases in quantum sciences. Next, we describe deep generative models, which have proven to be an extremely appealing tool for sampling from unknown target distributions in domains ranging from high-energy physics to quantum chemistry. Finally, we describe selected machine learning applications for experimental setups such as ultracold systems or quantum dots. In particular, we show how machine learning can help in tedious and repetitive experimental tasks in quantum devices or in validating quantum simulators with Hamiltonian learning.