Older adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) benefit more from treatment augmentation than switching. It is useful to identify moderators that influence these treatment strategies for personalised medicine.

Our objective was to test whether age, executive dysfunction, comorbid medical burden, comorbid anxiety or the number of previous adequate antidepressant trials could moderate the superiority of augmentation over switching. A significant moderator would influence the differential effect of augmentation versus switching on treatment outcomes.

We performed a preplanned moderation analysis of data from the Optimizing Outcomes of Treatment-Resistant Depression in Older Adults (OPTIMUM) randomised controlled trial (N = 742). Participants were 60 years old or older with TRD. Participants were either (a) randomised to antidepressant augmentation with aripiprazole (2.5–15 mg), bupropion (150–450 mg) or lithium (target serum drug level 0.6 mmol/L) or (b) switched to bupropion (150–450 mg) or nortriptyline (target serum drug level 80–120 ng/mL). Treatment duration was 10 weeks. The two main outcomes of this analysis were (a) symptom improvement, defined as change in Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores from baseline to week 10 and (b) remission, defined as MADRS score of 10 or less at week 10.

Of the 742 participants, 480 were randomised to augmentation and 262 to switching. The number of adequate previous antidepressant trials was a significant moderator of depression symptom improvement (b = −1.6, t = −2.1, P = 0.033, 95% CI [−3.0, −0.1], where b is the coefficient of the relationship (i.e. effect size), and t is the t-statistic for that coefficient associated with the P-value). The effect was similar across all augmentation strategies. No other putative moderators were significant.

Augmenting was superior to switching antidepressants only in older patients with fewer than three previous antidepressant trials. This suggests that other intervention strategies should be considered following three or more trials.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been associated with advanced epigenetic age cross-sectionally, but the association between these variables over time is unclear. This study conducted meta-analyses to test whether new-onset PTSD diagnosis and changes in PTSD symptom severity over time were associated with changes in two metrics of epigenetic aging over two time points.

We conducted meta-analyses of the association between change in PTSD diagnosis and symptom severity and change in epigenetic age acceleration/deceleration (age-adjusted DNA methylation age residuals as per the Horvath and GrimAge metrics) using data from 7 military and civilian cohorts participating in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium PTSD Epigenetics Workgroup (total N = 1,367).

Meta-analysis revealed that the interaction between Time 1 (T1) Horvath age residuals and new-onset PTSD over time was significantly associated with Horvath age residuals at T2 (meta β = 0.16, meta p = 0.02, p-adj = 0.03). The interaction between T1 Horvath age residuals and changes in PTSD symptom severity over time was significantly related to Horvath age residuals at T2 (meta β = 0.24, meta p = 0.05). No associations were observed for GrimAge residuals.

Results indicated that individuals who developed new-onset PTSD or showed increased PTSD symptom severity over time evidenced greater epigenetic age acceleration at follow-up than would be expected based on baseline age acceleration. This suggests that PTSD may accelerate biological aging over time and highlights the need for intervention studies to determine if PTSD treatment has a beneficial effect on the aging methylome.

Although atypical antipsychotics have lowered the prevalence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), they still contribute to the overall side-effect burden of approved antipsychotics. Drugs with novel mechanisms without D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity have shown promise in treating schizophrenia without the side effects of currently available treatments. KarXT (xanomeline–trospium chloride) represents a possible alternative that targets muscarinic receptors. KarXT demonstrated efficacy compared with placebo in 3 out of 3 short-term acute studies and has not been associated with many of the side effects of D2 dopamine receptor antagonists. Here, we further characterize EPS rates with KarXT in these trials.

EMERGENT-1 (NCT03697252), EMERGENT-2 (NCT04659161), and EMERGENT-3 (NCT04738123) were 5-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, inpatient trials in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis. Data from the safety populations, defined as all participants who received ³1 dose of trial medication, were pooled. For this analysis, we used a broader definition of EPS-related adverse events (AEs) to encompass any new onset of dystonia, dyskinesia, akathisia, or extrapyramidal disorder reported any time after the first dose of medication. Additionally, EPS were assessed by examining change from baseline to week 5 on the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS).

A total of 683 participants (KarXT, n=340; placebo, n=343) were included in the analyses. The rate of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) associated with EPS was 3.2% in the KarXT group vs 0.9% in the placebo group. The most commonly reported TEAE was akathisia (KarXT, 2.4%; placebo 0.9%); half of possible akathisia cases in the KarXT group (4/8 TEAEs) were from a single US site, considered by the investigator to be unrelated to trial drug, and resolved without treatment. Overall rates of akathisia TEAEs deemed related to trial drug were low (KarXT, 0.6%; placebo 0.3%). Dystonia, dyskinesia, and extrapyramidal disorder TEAEs were reported by only a single subject each (0.3%) in the KarXT arm. All reported TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. KarXT was associated with no clinically meaningful mean±SD changes from baseline to week 5 on the SAS (-0.1±0.6), BARS (-0.1±0.9), or AIMS (0.0±0.7).

The incidence of EPS-related TEAEs with KarXT was low in comparison to those observed in similar trials of antipsychotics (D2 dopamine receptor antagonists), although head-to-head studies have not been completed. Moreover, KarXT was not associated with increased scores on EPS scales (SAS, BARS, AIMS) across 5 weeks of treatment. These results, combined with the robust efficacy of KarXT in trials to date, suggest that KarXT’s novel mechanism of action may provide therapeutic benefit in the absence of EPS frequently associated with currently available antipsychotics.

Karuna Therapeutics

In prior studies, the dual M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline demonstrated antipsychotic activity in people with schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease, but its further clinical development was limited primarily by gastrointestinal side effects. KarXT combines xanomeline and the peripherally restricted muscarinic receptor antagonist trospium chloride. KarXT is designed to preserve xanomeline’s beneficial central nervous system effects while mitigating adverse events (AEs) due to peripheral muscarinic receptor activation. The efficacy and safety of KarXT in schizophrenia was demonstrated in the 5-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EMERGENT-1 (NCT03697252), EMERGENT-2 (NCT04659161), and EMERGENT-3 (NCT04738123) trials.

The EMERGENT trials enrolled people with a recent worsening of positive symptoms warranting hospitalization, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score ≥80, and Clinical Global Impression–Severity score ≥4. Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to KarXT or placebo. KarXT dosing (xanomeline/trospium) started at 50 mg/20 mg twice daily (BID) and increased to a maximum of 125 mg/30 mg BID. Safety was assessed by monitoring for spontaneous AEs after administration of the first dose of trial drug until the time of discharge on day 35. Data from the EMERGENT trials were pooled, and all safety analyses were conducted in the safety population, defined as all participants who received ≥1 dose of trial drug.

A total of 683 participants (KarXT, n=340; placebo, n=343) were included in the pooled safety analyses. Across the EMERGENT trials, 51.8% of people in the KarXT group compared with 29.4% in the placebo group reported ≥1 treatment-related AE. The most common treatment-relatedAEs occurring in ≥5% of participants receiving KarXT and at a rate at least twice that observed in the placebo group were nausea (17.1% vs 3.2%), constipation (15.0% vs 5.2%), dyspepsia (11.5% vs 2.3%), vomiting (10.9% vs 0.9%), and dry mouth (5.0% vs 1.5%). The most common treatment-related AEs in the KarXT group were all mild or moderate in severity.

In pooled analyses from the EMERGENT trials, KarXT was generally well tolerated in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis. These findings, together with the efficacy results showing a clinically meaningful reduction in the symptoms of schizophrenia, support the potential of KarXT to be the first in a new class of antipsychotic medications based on muscarinic receptor agonism and a well-tolerated alternative to currently available antipsychotics.

Karuna Therapeutics

Prior studies demonstrated the antipsychotic activity of the dual M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline in people with schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease, but its further clinical development was limited primarily by gastrointestinal side effects. KarXT combines xanomeline and the peripherally restricted muscarinic receptor antagonist trospium chloride. KarXT is designed to preserve xanomeline’s beneficial central nervous system effects while mitigating side effects due to peripheral muscarinic receptor activation. The efficacy and safety of KarXT in schizophrenia were demonstrated in the 5-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EMERGENT-1 (NCT03697252), EMERGENT-2 (NCT04659161), and EMERGENT-3 (NCT04738123) trials.

The EMERGENT trials randomized people with a recent worsening of positive symptoms warranting hospitalization, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥80, and Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) score ≥4. KarXT dosing (xanomeline/trospium) started at 50 mg/20 mg twice daily (BID) and increased to a maximum of 125 mg/30 mg BID. In each trial, the primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS total score. Other efficacy measures included change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS positive subscale, PANSS negative subscale, PANSS Marder negative factor, and CGI-S scores. Data from the EMERGENT trials were pooled, and efficacy analyses were conducted in the modified intent-to-treat population, defined as all randomized participants who received ≥1 trial drug dose and had a baseline and ≥1 postbaseline PANSS assessment.

The pooled analyses included 640 participants (KarXT, n=314; placebo, n=326). Across trials, KarXT was associated with a significantly greater reduction in PANSS total score at week 5 compared with placebo (KarXT, -19.4; placebo, -9.6 [least squares mean (LSM) difference, -9.9; 95% CI, -12.4 to -7.3; P<0.0001; Cohen’s d, 0.65]). At week 5, KarXT was also associated with a significantly greater reduction than placebo in PANSS positive subscale (KarXT, -6.3; placebo, -3.1 [LSM difference, -3.2; 95% CI, -4.1 to -2.4; P<0.0001; Cohen’s d, 0.67]), PANSS negative subscale (KarXT, -3.0; placebo, -1.3 [LSM difference, -1.7; 95% CI, -2.4 to -1.0; P<0.0001; Cohen’s d, 0.40]), PANSS Marder negative factor (KarXT, -3.8; placebo, -1.8 [LSM difference, -2.0; 95% CI, -2.8 to -1.2; P<0.0001; Cohen’s d, 0.42]), and CGI-S scores (KarXT, -1.1; placebo, -0.5 [LSM difference, -0.6; 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.4; P<0.0001; Cohen’s d, 0.63]).

In pooled analyses from the EMERGENT trials, KarXT demonstrated statistically significant improvements across efficacy measures with consistent and robust effect sizes. These findings support the potential of KarXT to be first in a new class of medications to treat schizophrenia based on muscarinic receptor agonism and without any direct dopamine D2 receptor blocking activity.

Karuna Therapeutics

Fifteen years ago, we published an article in Social Science and Medicine seeking to resolve the contentious debate between advocates of two very different frameworks for understanding and addressing the mental health needs of conflict-affected populations. The two approaches, which we labelled trauma-focused and psychosocial, reflect deeply held beliefs about the causes and nature of distress in war-affected communities. Drawing on the burgeoning literature on armed conflict and mental health, the reports of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) staff in the field, and on research on the psychology and psychophysiology of stress, we proposed an integrative model that drew on the strengths of both frameworks and underscored their essential complementarity. Our model includes two primary pathways by which armed conflict impacts mental health: directly, through exposure to war-related violence and loss, and indirectly, through the harsh conditions of everyday life caused or exacerbated by armed conflict. The mediated model we proposed draws attention to the effects of stressors both past (prior exposure to war-related violence and loss) and present (ongoing conflict, daily stressors), at all levels of the social ecology; for that reason, we have termed it an ecological model for understanding the mental health needs of conflict-affected populations.

In the ensuing 15 years, the model has been rigorously tested in diverse populations and has found robust support. In this paper, we first summarize the development and key tenets of the model and briefly review recent empirical support for it. We then discuss the implications of an ecological framework for interventions aimed at strengthening mental health in conflict-affected populations.

We present preliminary evidence suggesting there has been a gradual shift towards more ecological (i.e., multilevel, multimodal) programming in MHPSS interventions, along the lines suggested by our model as well as other conceptually related frameworks, particularly public health.

We reflect on several gaps in the model, most notably the absence of adverse childhood experiences. We suggest the importance of examining early adversity as both a direct influence on mental health and as a potential moderator of the impact of potentially traumatic war-related experiences of violence and loss.

Paediatric patients with heart failure requiring ventricular assist devices are at heightened risk of neurologic injury and psychosocial adjustment challenges, resulting in a need for neurodevelopmental and psychosocial support following device placement. Through a descriptive survey developed in collaboration by the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network and the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative, the present study aimed to characterise current neurodevelopmental and psychosocial care practices for paediatric patients with ventricular assist devices.

Members of both learning networks developed a 25-item electronic survey assessing neurodevelopmental and psychosocial care practices specific to paediatric ventricular assist device patients. The survey was sent to Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network site primary investigators and co-primary investigators via email.

Of the 63 eligible sites contacted, responses were received from 24 unique North and South American cardiology centres. Access to neurodevelopmental providers, referral practices, and family neurodevelopmental education varied across sites. Inpatient neurodevelopmental care consults were available at many centres, as were inpatient family support services. Over half of heart centres had outpatient neurodevelopmental testing and individual psychotherapy services available to patients with ventricular assist devices, though few centres had outpatient group psychotherapy (12.5%) or parent support groups (16.7%) available. Barriers to inpatient and outpatient neurodevelopmental care included limited access to neurodevelopmental providers and parent/provider focus on the child’s medical status.

Paediatric patients with ventricular assist devices often have access to neurodevelopmental providers in the inpatient setting, though supports vary by centre. Strengthening family neurodevelopmental education, referral processes, and family-centred psychosocial services may improve current neurodevelopmental/psychosocial care for paediatric ventricular assist device patients.

Although psychological interventions can be used to improve chronic pain management, underserved individuals (i.e., racially minoritized and socioeconomically disadvantaged) may be less likely to engage in such services. The purpose of this study was to examine whether offering a psychological intervention for chronic pain in a primary care clinic could be a method in which to successfully engage underserved patients.

There were 220 patients with chronic pain in a primary care clinic located in a socioeconomically and racially diverse city who were approached to discuss enrolment in a pilot randomized controlled trial of a five-session psychological intervention for chronic pain. Patients were introduced to the study by their primary care provider using the warm handoff model. We compared whether there were sociodemographic differences between those who enrolled in the study and those who declined to enrol.

There were no differences between those who enrolled and those who declined enrolment with regard to race, age, insurance type, and household income. However, females were more likely to enrol in the study compared to males.

Recruiting patients to participate in a trial of a psychological intervention for chronic pain in a primary care clinic appeared to be effective for engaging Black patients, patients with lower income, and those with government insurance. Thus, offering a psychological intervention for chronic pain in a primary care clinic may encourage engagement among racially minoritized individuals and those with lower socioeconomic status.

Despite advances in treatment and outcomes for paediatric heart failure, both physical and psychosocial comorbidities remain notable among this patient population. We aimed to qualitatively describe the psychosocial experiences of adolescent and young adults with heart failure and their caregivers’ perceptions, with specific focus on personal challenges, worries, coping skills, and resilience.

Structured, in-depth interviews were performed with 16 adolescent and young adults with heart failure and 14 of their caregivers. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was performed, and themes were generated. Transcripts were coded by independent reviewers.

Ten (63%) adolescent and young adults with heart failure identified as male and six (37.5%) patients self-identified with a racial or ethnic minority group. Adolescent and young adults with heart failure generally perceived their overall illness experience more positively and less burdensome than their caregivers. Some adolescent and young adults noted specific worries related to surgeries, admissions, major complications, death, and prognostic/treatment uncertainty, while caregivers perceived their adolescent and young adult’s greatest worries to be around major complications and death. Adolescent and young adults and their caregivers were able to define and reflect on adolescent and young adult experiences of resilience, with many adolescent and young adults expressing a sense of optimism and gratitude as it relates to their medical journey.

This study is the first of its kind to qualitatively describe the psychosocial experiences of a racially and socioeconomically diverse sample of adolescent and young adults with heart failure, as well as their caregivers’ perceptions of patient experiences. Findings underscore the importance of identifying distress and fostering resilient processes and outcomes in young people with advanced heart disease.