Brazil’s public health system serves most of the population, but 25 percent of citizens rely on private health insurance. The National Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance and Plans (ANS) regulates private medicine reimbursements, which diverge from the public sector threshold. In 2022, the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) set a willingness-to-pay benchmark of BRL40,000 (USD8,215) per quality-adjusted life-year. The ANS has no such benchmark, highlighting a pivotal gap in economic evaluations for private health care.

This quantitative study investigated the Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for reimbursed medicines in Brazil’s private health sector, comparing them with CONITEC’s benchmarks and international thresholds. Data were extracted from industry reimbursement submissions to the ANS and analyzed for statistical disparity and policy implications.

Preliminary findings found an ICER peak of BRL619,900 (USD127,220) per quality-adjusted life-year for talazoparib, which is used to treat certain advanced breast cancers. This contrasted sharply with CONITEC’s established threshold, indicating a critical need to evaluate ANS policies.

Early results indicate that the ICERs for some medicines surpass CONITEC’s willingness-to-pay limit, suggesting that the ANS should consider establishing a defined cost-effectiveness threshold. This is imperative to harmonize with global standards and maintain sustainable health financing.

Despite medical advancements, endocarditis still results in high mortality rates. Surgery, while often essential, elevates the risk of hyperinflammation, sepsis, and cytokine release. The use of a cytokine filter to prevent this remains controversial. This study reviewed existing literature to assess the efficacy of cytokine filters and to support its integration into supplementary health services.

An exhaustive search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, and CytoSorbents Corporation databases was conducted to identify relevant meta-analyses and systematic reviews. The study focused on randomized controlled trials and case series studies assessing the efficacy of cytokine filtration. Key variables considered were the duration of antibiotic treatment, severity of endocarditis, and surgical treatment rationale. These factors were crucial for evaluating clinical outcomes and patient survival after surgery.

The systematic reviews yielded mixed outcomes. Two found no benefits for hemoadsorption, while one found that it reduced mortality rates and intensive care unit stays based on observational studies. Randomized controlled trials, however, showed no significant impact for cytokine filters on mortality rates or postoperative hemodynamic parameters. In contrast, case series studies reported potential benefits, but these results were confounded by biases in patient allocation and failure to account for critical variables like antibiotic treatment duration, case severity, and surgical rationale. These discrepancies highlight the complexity of evaluating the effectiveness of cytokine filtration in surgical settings.

Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on the role of cytokine filters in cardiac surgery for endocarditis reported contradictory findings. Only case series studies suggested benefits from cytokine filters, necessitating further high quality research before recommending their widespread use. Understanding the implications of these results is essential, underscoring the need for more rigorous studies to resolve these inconsistencies.

Informed healthcare policies in Brazil rely on robust health technology assessment (HTA), especially for conditions like non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present an efficiency frontier analysis to evaluate NSCLC treatments that correlates annual treatment costs with clinical outcomes, offering a systematic approach to enhance decision-making in the Brazilian healthcare context.

This quantitative study analyzed NSCLC drug costs within the Brazilian healthcare system and the clinical efficacy data of pivotal studies. The data were analyzed using Python and R software. The dataset comprised drug costs and hazard ratios for overall survival. After data preparation, which involved normalization and outlier management, we constructed an efficiency frontier by ranking drugs based on cost and effectiveness. A linear regression model was then developed to extrapolate this frontier, deriving a formula that predicts treatment costs for specified improvements in overall survival.

The analysis delineated an efficiency frontier and revealed cost-effective NSCLC treatments in Brazil. The following linear regression equation was derived: overall survival = (1.033551 − 0.000003) × treatment cost (USD). This allows for the estimation of appropriate treatment costs for new therapies based on their expected clinical outcomes. This initial model provides a foundation for estimating the economic impact of new treatments.

This preliminary efficiency frontier analysis offers a novel perspective for evaluating NSCLC treatment strategies in Brazil to support sustainable healthcare policy decisions. The model is subject to limitations due to the absence of a systematic literature review. However, it represents an initial step towards a more comprehensive HTA framework. Further research should refine the model by including systematic data collection and analysis.

In Brazil, equitable access to medications is critical. There are significant pricing disparities between the National Health System and private health care, which are influenced by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) and Law 14.307. This study investigated these disparities, with aim of proposing strategies for equitable access and sustainability in health care.

This analysis compared prices between the public and private sectors for trastuzumab and adalimumab. Public sector prices were obtained from the Health Prices Database (HPD) and private sector prices were obtained from the Unimed National Table of Materials and Medications (TNUMM), as of May 2023. The study evaluated the extent of pricing discrepancies, considering Drug Market Regulation Chamber ceiling prices and industry discounts.

The cost of the trastuzumab biosimilar, KANJINTI® (Amgen Inc.), was BRL15.79 (USD3.24) per mg in the private sector, compared with BRL4.50 (USD0.92) per mg in the public sector (a 250% difference). The original version of adalimumab, HUMIRA® (AbbVie), was priced at BRL5,450.38 (USD1,120.53) in the TNUMM versus BRL2,445.46 (USD502.33) in the HPD (a 123% difference). The adalimumab biosimilar, HYRIMOZ® (Sandoz Inc.), was priced at BRL7,723.99 (USD1,586.87) in the TNUMM compared with BRL2,449.19 (USD503.05) in the HPD (a 215% price discrepancy).

The study highlights significant disparities in drug pricing between Brazil’s public and private healthcare sectors. These disparities affect the financial sustainability of private health entities and elevate costs for consumers, potentially increasing reliance on the National Health System. Policy revisions, price parity strategies, and further studies are vital for a sustainable healthcare system.

Frontline healthcare workers (FHCWs) exposed to COVID-19 patients are at an increased risk of developing psychological burden. This study aims to determine the prevalence of mental health symptoms and associated factors among Mexican FHCWs attending COVID-19 patients.

FHCWs, including attending physicians, residents/fellows, and nurses providing care to COVID-19 patients at a private hospital in Monterrey, Mexico, were invited to answer an online survey between August 28, and November 30, 2020. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and insomnia were evaluated with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7, Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with each outcome.

131 FHCWs, 43.5% attending physicians, 19.8% residents/fellows, and 36.6% nurses were included. The overall prevalence of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and insomnia was 36%, 21%, 23%, and 24% respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that residents/fellows and nurses reported more depression and insomnia than attending physicians. Although not significant, residents/fellows were more likely to experience all symptoms than nurses.

Mexican FHCWs, especially nurses and residents/fellows, experienced a significant psychological burden while attending to COVID-19 patients. Tailored interventions providing support to FHCWs during future outbreaks are required.

We summarize some of the past year's most important findings within climate change-related research. New research has improved our understanding of Earth's sensitivity to carbon dioxide, finds that permafrost thaw could release more carbon emissions than expected and that the uptake of carbon in tropical ecosystems is weakening. Adverse impacts on human society include increasing water shortages and impacts on mental health. Options for solutions emerge from rethinking economic models, rights-based litigation, strengthened governance systems and a new social contract. The disruption caused by COVID-19 could be seized as an opportunity for positive change, directing economic stimulus towards sustainable investments.

A synthesis is made of ten fields within climate science where there have been significant advances since mid-2019, through an expert elicitation process with broad disciplinary scope. Findings include: (1) a better understanding of equilibrium climate sensitivity; (2) abrupt thaw as an accelerator of carbon release from permafrost; (3) changes to global and regional land carbon sinks; (4) impacts of climate change on water crises, including equity perspectives; (5) adverse effects on mental health from climate change; (6) immediate effects on climate of the COVID-19 pandemic and requirements for recovery packages to deliver on the Paris Agreement; (7) suggested long-term changes to governance and a social contract to address climate change, learning from the current pandemic, (8) updated positive cost–benefit ratio and new perspectives on the potential for green growth in the short- and long-term perspective; (9) urban electrification as a strategy to move towards low-carbon energy systems and (10) rights-based litigation as an increasingly important method to address climate change, with recent clarifications on the legal standing and representation of future generations.

Stronger permafrost thaw, COVID-19 effects and growing mental health impacts among highlights of latest climate science.

To evaluate an abbreviated NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) protocol that can be administered remotely without any in-person assessments, and explore the agreement between prorated scores from the abbreviated protocol and standard scores from the full protocol.

Participant-level age-corrected NIHTB-CB data were extracted from six studies in individuals with a history of stroke, mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), treatment-resistant psychosis, and healthy controls, with testing administered under standard conditions. Prorated fluid and total cognition scores were estimated using regression equations that excluded the three fluid cognition NIHTB-CB instruments which cannot be administered remotely. Paired t tests and intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used to compare the standard and prorated scores.

Data were available for 245 participants. For fluid cognition, overall prorated scores were higher than standard scores (mean difference = +4.5, SD = 14.3; p < 0.001; ICC = 0.86). For total cognition, overall prorated scores were higher than standard scores (mean difference = +2.7, SD = 8.3; p < 0.001; ICC = 0.88). These differences were significant in the stroke and mTBI groups, but not in the healthy control or psychosis groups.

Prorated scores from an abbreviated NIHTB-CB protocol are not a valid replacement for the scores from the standard protocol. Alternative approaches to administering the full protocol, or corrections to scoring of the abbreviated protocol, require further study and validation.

The decision to adopt forced medication in psychiatric care is particularly relevant from a clinical and ethical viewpoint. The European Commission has funded the EUNOMIA study in order to develop European recommendations for good clinical practice on coercive measures, including forced medication.

The recommendations on forced medication have been developed in 11 countries with the involvement of national clinical leaders, key-professionals and stakeholders’ representatives. The national recommendations have been subsequently summarized into a European shared document.

Several cross-national differences exist in the use of forced medication. These differences are mainly due to legal and policy making aspects, rather than to clinical situations. In fact, countries agreed that forced medication can be allowed only if the following criteria are present: 1) a therapeutic intervention is urgently needed; 2) the voluntary intake of medications is consistently rejected; 3) the patient is not aware of his/her condition. Patients’ dignity, privacy and safety shall be preserved at all times.

The results of our study show the need of developing guidelines on the use of forced medication in psychiatric practice, that should be considered as the last resort and only when other therapeutic option have failed.

Firefighters represent an important population for understanding the consequences of exposure to potentially traumatic stressors.

The researchers were interested in the effects of pre-employment disaster exposure on firefighter recruits’ depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms during the first three years of fire service and hypothesized that: (1) disaster-exposed firefighters would have greater depression and PTSD symptoms than non-exposed overall; and (2) depression and PTSD symptoms would worsen over years in fire service in exposed firefighters, but not in their unexposed counterparts.

In a baseline interview, 35 male firefighter recruits from seven US cities reported lifetime exposure to natural disaster. These disaster-exposed male firefighter recruits were matched on age, city, and education with non-exposed recruits.

A generalized linear mixed model revealed a significant exposure×time interaction (ecoef =1.04; P<.001), such that depression symptoms increased with time for those with pre-employment disaster exposure only. This pattern persisted after controlling for social support from colleagues (ecoefficient=1.05; P<.001), social support from families (ecoefficient=1.04; P=.001), and on-the-job trauma exposure (coefficient=0.06; ecoefficient=1.11; P<.001). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms did not vary significantly between exposure groups at baseline (P=.61).

Depression symptoms increased with time for those with pre-employment disaster exposure only, even after controlling for social support. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms did not vary between exposure groups.

PenningtonML , CarpenterTP , SynettSJ , TorresVA , TeagueJ , MorissetteSB , KnightJ , KamholzBW , KeaneTM , ZimeringRT , GulliverSB . The Influence of Exposure to Natural Disasters on Depression and PTSD Symptoms among Firefighters. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):102–108.