Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-04T04:17:06.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Camouflage-breaking mathematical operators and countershading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Ariel Tankus  and
Yehezkel Yeshurun
Edited by
Martin Stevens  and
Sami Merilaita
Ariel Tankus
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University, Israel
Yehezkel Yeshurun
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University, Israel
Martin Stevens
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Sami Merilaita
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Get access

Summary

Visual camouflage is used by animals as well as humans in order to conceal or obscure their visual signature. In the field of computer vision, work related to camouflage can be roughly divided into two: camouflage assessment and design (e.g. Copeland & Trivedi 1997; Gretzmacher et al. 1998), and camouflage breaking. Despite the ongoing research, only little has been said in the computer vision literature on visual camouflage breaking (Marouani et al. 1995; Guilan & Shunqing 1997; McKee et al. 1997; Ternovskiy & Jannson 1997; Huimin et al. 1999).

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Camouflage
Mechanisms and Function
 , pp. 73 - 86
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Behrens, R. R. 1978. On visual art and camouflage. Leonardo, 11, 203–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, R. R. 1988. The theories of Abbott H. Thayer: father of camouflage. Leonardo, 21, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. W. & Chan, K. H. S. 2007. Swimming in the upside down catfish Synodontis nigriventris: it matters which way is up. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 2979–2989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boynton, M. F. 1952. Abbott Thayer and natural history. Osiris, 10, 542–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, S., Ciszek, D., Berg, N. E. & Shefferly, N. 2001. The ontogeny and distribution of countershading in colonies of the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Journal of Zoology, 253, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressloff, P. C. & Cowan, J. D. 2003. A spherical model for orientation and spatial-frequency tuning in a cortical hypercolumn. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 358, 1643–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, A. C. & Trivedi, M. M. 1997. Models and metrics for signature strength evaluation of camouflaged targets. SPIE, 3070, 194–199.Google Scholar
Edmunds, M. & Dewhirst, R. A. 1994. The survival value of countershading with wild birds as predators. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 51, 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, G. P., Messenger, J. B. & Budelmann, B. U. 1994. Gravity and light influence the countershading reflexes of the cuttlefishSepia officinalis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 191, 247–256.Google ScholarPubMed
Gregorin, R., Goncalves, E., Lim, B. K. & Engstrom, M. D. 2006. New species of disk-winged bat Thyroptera and range extension for T. discifera. Journal of Mammalogy, 87(2), 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gretzmacher, F. M., Ruppert, G. S. & Nyberg, S. 1998. Camouflage assessment considering human perception data. SPIE, 3375, 58–67.Google Scholar
Guilan, S. & Shunqing, T. 1997. Method for pectral pattern recognition of color camouflage. Optical Engineering, 36, 1779–1781.Google Scholar
Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. 1974. Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: a parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor. Journal of Comparative Neurology A, 158, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latz, M. I. 1995. Physiological mechanisms in the control of bioluminescent countershading in a midwater shrimp. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 26, 207–218.
Levine, M. D. 1985. Vision in Man and Machine. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lindsay, S. M., Frank, T. M., Kent, J., Partridge, J. C. & Latz, M. I. 1999. Spectral sensitivity of vision and bioluminescence in the midwater shrimpSergestes similis. Biological Bulletin, 197, 348–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marouani, S., Huertas, A. & Medioni, G. 1995. Model-based aircraft recognition in perspective aerial imagery. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Vision, pp. 371–376.
McKee, S. P., Watamaniuk, S. N. J., Harris, J. M., Smallman, H. S. & Taylor, D. G. 1997. Is stereopsis effective in breaking camouflage? Vision Research, 37, 2047–2055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osorio, D. & Srinivasan, M. V. 1991. Camouflage by edge enhancement in animal coloration patterns and its implications for visual mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 244, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portmann, A. 1959. Animal Camouflage. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Poulton, E. B. & Thayer, A. H. 1902. The meaning of the white under sides of animals. Nature, 65, 596–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisfeld, D., Wolfson, H. & Yeshurun, Y. 1995. Context free attentional operators: the generalized symmetry transform. International Journal of Computer Vision, 14, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, H. M., Speed, M. P., Ruxton, G. D.et al. 2007. Countershading enhances cryptic protection: an experiment with wild birds and artificial prey. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1249–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, H. M., Cuthill, I. C., Harvey, I. F., Speed, M. P. & Ruxton, G. D. 2008. Can't tell the caterpillars from the trees: countershading enhances survival in a woodland. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 275, 2539–2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruxton, G. D., Speed, M. P. & Kelly, D. J. 2004. What, if anything, is the adaptive function of countershading? Animal Behaviour, 68, 445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speed, M. P., Kelly, D. J., Davidson, A. M. & Ruxton, G. D. 2005. Countershading enhances crypsis with some bird species but not others. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffer, J. R. Jr, Hale, E. A. & Seltzer, R. 1999. Hunting strategies of a Lake Malawi cichlid with reverse countershading. Copeia, 4, 1108–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankus, A. and Yeshurun, Y. 1998. Detection of regions of interest and camouflage breaking by direct convexity estimation. IEEE Workshop on Visual Surveillance, January 1998, pp. 42–48.Google Scholar
Tankus, A. & Yeshurun, Y. 2001. Convexity-based visual camouflage breaking. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 82, 208–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankus, A., Yeshurun, Y. & Intrator, N. 1997. Face detection by direct convexity estimation. Pattern Recognition Letters, 18, 913–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankus, A., Yeshurun, Y. & Intrator, N. 1999. Face detection and camouflage breaking by direct convexity estimation. In Human and Machine Perception 2: Emergence, Attention and Creativity, eds. Cantoni, V., Gesu, V.Di, Setti, A. & Tegolo, D.Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ternovskiy, I. V. & Jannson, T. 1997. Mapping-singularities-based motion estimation. SPIE, 3173, 317–321.Google Scholar
Thayer, A. H. 1896a. The law which underlies protective coloration. The Auk, 13, 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, A. H. 1896b. Further remarks on the law which underlies protective coloration. The Auk, 13, 318–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, A. H. 1909. An arraignment of the theories of mimicry and warning colors. Popular Science Monthly, New York, 550–570.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×