Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T18:27:06.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Towards a Cognitively Realistic Model of Meaningful Sociolinguistic Variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Anna M. Babel
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amodio, David M. and Devine., Patricia G. 2006. Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(4):652–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asch, Solomon E. 1946. Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41:258–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auer, Peter, Barden, Birgit, and Grosskopf, Beate. 1998. Subjective and objective parameters determining “salience” in long-term dialect accommodation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(2):163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Molly. 2010. Dialect convergence and divergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society 39(4):437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcetis, Emily E. and Dale, Rick. 2005. An exploration of social modulation of syntactic priming, in Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, pp. 184–9.Google Scholar
Ball, Peter, Giles, Howard, Byrne, Jane L., and Berechree, Philip. 1984. Situational constraints on the evaluative significance of speech accommodation: Some Australian data. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46:115–29.Google Scholar
Bar, Moshe. 2007. The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 11(7):280–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Bargh, John A. 2006. What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 36:147–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargh, John A., Green, Michelle, and Fitzsimons, Gráinne. 2008. The selfish goal: Unintended consequences of intended goal pursuits. Social Cognition 26(5):534–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, Roy F. and Heatherton, Todd F.. 1996. Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry 7(1):115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., Masicampo, E. J., and Vohs, Kathleen D. 2011. Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology 62:331–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckman, Mary E. and Edwards, Jan. 2000. The ontogeny of phonological categories and the primacy of lexical learning in linguistic development. Child Development 71(1):240–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bender, Emily. 2001. Syntactic variation and linguistic competence: The case of AAVE copula absence. PhD dissertation. Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
Blackmer, Elizabeth R. and Mitton, Janet L. 1991. Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech. Cognition 39:173–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Blom, Jan-Petter and Gumperz, John. 1972. Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code-switching in Norway, in Gumperz, John and Hymes, Dell H. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, pp. 407–34. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn J. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18:355–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Rick D. and Bassili, John N.. 2002. Spontaneous trait associations and the case of the superstitious banana. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38:8792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulard, Inès and Carr, Philip. 2013. Variability, unconscious accent adaptation and sense of identity: The case of RP influences on speakers of Standard Scottish English. Language Sciences 39:151–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982. Language and Symbolic Power. Raymond, Gino and Adamson, Matthew (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campanella, Salvatore and Belin, Pascal. 2007. Integrating face and voice in person perception. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 11(12):535–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1):3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2008. I’ll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37(5):637–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. The effect of speaker information on attitudes toward (ING). Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(2):214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2011. The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22(3):423–41.Google Scholar
Cargile, Aaron Castelan. 1997. Attitudes towards Chinese-accented speech: An investigation in two contexts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16:434–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cargile, Aaron Castelan and Giles, Howard. 1998. Language attitudes toward varieties of English: An American-Japanese context. Journal of Applied Communication Research 26:338–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlston, Donal E. and Mae, Lynda. 2007. Posing with the flag: Trait-specific effects of symbols on person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:241–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, Tanya L. and Bargh, John A. 1996. Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(3):464–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, William A., Van Bavel, Jay J., Arbuckle, Nathan L., Packer, Dominic J., and Waggoner, Ashley S. 2012. Rapid social perception is flexible: Approach and avoidance motivational states shape P100 responses to other-race faces. Frontiers in Neuroscience 6, Article 140.Google ScholarPubMed
Dahan, Delphine, Drucker, Sarah J., and Scarborough, Rebecca A. 2008. Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? Cognition 108:710–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, T. W. 2003. Universal grammar and semiotic constraints, in Christiansen, M. H. and Kirby, S. (eds), Language Evolution, pp. 111–39. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Gelder, Beatrice, Pourtois, Gilles, and Weiskrantz, Lawrence. 2002. Fear recognition in the voice is modulated by unconsciously recognized facial expressions but not by unconsciously recognized affective pictures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99(6):4121–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Gelder, Beatrice and Vroomen, Jean. 2000. The perception of emotions by ear and by eye. Cognition and Emotion 14(3):289311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Patricia G., Sedikides, Constantine, and Fuhrman, Robert W. 1989. Goals in social information processing: The case of anticipated interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(5):680–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Adele. 2013. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology 64:135–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draaisma, Douwe. 2000. Metaphors of Memory: A History of Ideas about the Mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drager, Katie. 2009. A sociophonetic ethnography of Selwyn Girls’ High. PhD dissertation. University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
Drager, Katie, Hay, Jennifer, and Walker, Abby. 2010. Pronounced rivalries: Attitudes and speech production. Te Reo 53:2753.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59:255–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, Melissa J. 2008. On becoming ready to pursue a goal you don’t know you have: Effects of nonconscious goals on evaluative readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(6):1268–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, Susan T. and Neuberg, Steven L. 1990. A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 21:174.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgas, Joseph P. and Bower, Gordon H. 1987. Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(1):5360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgas, Joseph P. and Moylan, Stephanie. 1988. After the movies: Transient mood and social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13(4):467–77.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jonathan B. and Ambady, Nalini. 2011. A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review 118(2):247–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galinsky, Adam D. and Moskowitz, Gordon B. 2007. Further ironies of suppression: Stereotype and counterstereotype accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:833–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, Bertram and Bodenhausen, Galen V. 2011. The Associative–Propositional Evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 44:59127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard and Powesland, Peter. 1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105(2):251–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govorun, Olesya and Keith Payne, B. 2006. Ego-depletion and prejudice: Separating automatic and controlled components. Social Cognition 24(2):111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 1991. Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3:122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. and Cutler, Cecelia. 2011. Speech style and authenticity: Quantitative evidence for the performance of identity. Language Variation and Change 23:139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassin, Ran R., Uleman, James S., and Bargh, John A. (eds.). 2005. The New Unconscious. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer and Drager, Katie. 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48(4):865–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1986[1967]. Models of the interaction of language and social life, in Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, pp. 3571. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ito, Tiffany A. and Bartholow, Bruce D. 2009. The neural correlates of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(12):524–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaeger, T. Florian and Snider, Neal. 2013. Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 127(1):5783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and poetics, in Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in Language, pp. 350377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34:485–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jussim, Lee, Fleming, Christopher J., Coleman, Lerita, and Kohberger, Cortney. 1996. The nature of stereotypes: II. a multiple-process model of evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26(4):283312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamachi, Miyuki, Hill, Harold, Lander, Karen, and Vatikiotis-Bateson, Eric. 2003. “Putting the face to the voice:” Matching identity across modality. Current Biology 13:1709–14.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia. 2013. Repair, in Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 229256. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klein, William M. and Kunda, Ziva. 1992. Motivated person perception: Constructing justifications for desired beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28:145–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraljic, Tanya, Samuel, Arthur G., and Brennan, Susan E. 2008. First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science 19(4):332–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristiansen, Tore. 2009. The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41:167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1993. The unobservability of structure and its linguistic consequences. Paper presented at NWAV 22, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej, and Nagy, Naomi. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4):431–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., and Fillenbaum, S. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1):4451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, Willem B. 1983. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14:41104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levon, Erez and Fox, Sue. 2014. Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ing and th-fronting in Britain. Unpublished manuscript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip. 2006. Toward an Evolutionary Biology of Language. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Macrae, C. Neil and Martin, Douglas. 2007. A boy primed Sue: Feature-based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology 37:793805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Brenda, Coricin, Suzanne, and Teuber, H.-L. 1968. Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: 14-year follow-up study of H.M. Neuropsychologia 6:215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Emma. 2011. Interaction between social category and social practice: Explaining was/were variation. Language Variation and Change 22:347–71.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):6285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooteboom, Sieb G. 2005. Lexical bias revisited: Detecting, rejecting and repairing speech errors in inner speech. Speech Communication 47:4358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, Lynne C. and Queen, Jennifer S. 2008. Communicating emotion: Linking affective prosody and word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 34(4):1017–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender, in Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 335–58. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Operario, Don and Fiske, Susan T. 2004. Stereotypes: Content, structures, processes, and context, in Brewer, Marilynn B. and Hewstone, Miles (eds.), Social Cognition, pp. 120–41. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Park, Sang Hee, Glaser, Jack, and Knowles, Eric D. 2008. Implicit motivation to control prejudice moderates the effect of cognitive depletion on unintended discrimination. Social Cognition 26(4):401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Arvilla C. 1980. Factors controlling the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children, in Labov, William (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space, pp. 143–78. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Payne, B. Keith. 2001. Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81:181–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. Keith. 2005. Conceptualizing control in social cognition: How executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(4):488503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B. Keith and Stewart, Brandon D. 2007. Automatic and controlled components of social cognition: A process dissociation approach, in Bargh, John A. (ed.), Social Psychology and the Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1901. Sign, in Baldwin, J. M. (ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. 2, p. 527. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, Maegaard, Marie, Møller, Janus S., and Kristiansen, Tore. 2014. Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43(1): 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. and Garrod, Simon. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2):169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. and Garrod, Simon. 2013. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(4):329–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, Martin J. and Garrod, Simon. 2014. Self-, other-, and joint monitoring using forward models. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8(132).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast, in Bybee, Joan and Hopper, Paul (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, pp. 137–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2011. The California vowel shift and gay identity. American Speech 86(1):3251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ráckz, Peter. 2013. Salience in Sociolinguistics: A Quantitative Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1986. The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Language and Communication 6(3):215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. and McNair-Knox, Faye. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study, in Biber, David and Finegan, Edward (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, pp. 235–76. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail, and Sacks, Harvey. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2):361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showers, Carolin and Cantor, Nancy. 1985. Social cognition: A look at motivated strategies. Annual Review of Psychology 36:275305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description, in Basso, Keith and Selby, Henry (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology, pp. 1155. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23:193229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Eliot R. and DeCoster, Jamie. 2000. Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(2):108–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Larry R. 2004. Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 82:171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staum Casasanto, Laura. 2008. Does social information influence sentence processing? in 30th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenage, Sarah V., Hugill, Andrew R., and Lewis, Hugh G. 2012. Integrating voice recognition into models of person perception. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24(4):409–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, Elizabeth A. 1999. Uncovering the roles of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):8699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uleman, James S., Hon, Alex, Roman, Robert J., and Moskowitz, Gordon B. 1996. On-line evidence for spontaneous trait inferences at encoding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(4):377–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Bavel, Jay J., Xiao, Yi Jenny, and Cunningham, William A. 2012. Evaluation is a dynamic process: Moving beyond dual system models. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6(6):438–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, Jos J. A. 2010. The brain is a prediction machine that cares about good and bad – any implications for neuropragmatics? Italian Journal of Linguistics 22(1):181208.Google Scholar
Van Berkum, Jos J. A., van den Brink, Danielle, Tesink, Cathelijne M. J. Y., Kos, Miriam, and Hagoort, Peter. 2008. The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(4):580–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Meerendonk, Nan, Kolk, Herman H. J., Chwilla, Dorothee J., and Vissers, Constance Th.W.M. 2009. Monitoring in language perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5):1211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hippel, William and Gonsalkorale, Karen. 2005. “That is bloody revolting!”: Inhibitory control of thoughts better left unsaid. Psychological Science 16(7):497500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, Dylan D. and Heatherton, Todd F. 2015. Self-regulation and its failure: The seven deadly threats to self-regulation, in Mikulincer, Mario, Shaver, Phillip R., Borgida, Eugene, and Bargh, John A. (eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 1: Attitudes and Social Cognition, pp. 805–42. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2013. Individual differences in social competence and attention to detail affect the sociolinguistic monitor. Paper presented at UKLVC 9.Google Scholar
Weatherholtz, Kodi, Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, and Florian Jaeger, T. 2014. Syntactic alignment and social perception. Language Variation and Change 26(3):387420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L., Abrego-Collier, Carissa, and Sonderegger, Morgan. 2013. Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and “autistic” traits. PLoS ONE 8(9).Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Qing. 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34:431–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×