Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:55:36.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social support assessment

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Brian Lakey
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Jay L. Cohen
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we review different approaches to assessing social support, as well as research evidence indicating the psychological and environmental characteristics that these measures reflect. A comprehensive review of all of the major social support measures is beyond the focus of this chapter, and we refer readers to recent comprehensive reviews (e.g. Brissette et al., 2000; Wills & Shinar, 2000). In this chapter, we briefly describe different types of social support measures, and review research bearing on their validity. We focus on the most widely used types of measures, although we also briefly describe under-utilized and more recently developed approaches.

Types of social support measures

There are at least three different types of social support constructs and measures; perceived support, enacted support and social integration/network characteristics (Barrera, 1986) (see ‘Social support and health’). Each type is most often assessed by self-report, whereby research participants complete questionnaires about participants' perceived availability of support (perceived support), the amount of specific supportive actions received (enacted support), or the number of different types of relationships in which people participate (social integration). Measures of these different types of support are only modestly related to each other, and relate to mental health, physical health and other constructs in different ways (Barrera, 1986).

Description of types of social support measures

Measures of perceived support

Measures of perceived support (also termed ‘functional support’, see chapter on ‘Social support and health’) ask respondents to make subjective judgments about the availability of support, or for some measures, about the quality of the support typically received.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbey, A., Andrews, F. M. & Halman, L. J. (1995). Provision and receipt of social support and disregard: what is the impact on the marital life quality of fertile and infertile couples?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 455–69.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T. C. & Israel, B. (1986). Veridicality of social support: a comparison of principal and network members' responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 432–37.Google Scholar
Barerra, M. Jr. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413–45.Google Scholar
Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N. & Ramsey, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–47.Google Scholar
Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A. & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–61.Google Scholar
Branje, S. J. T., Aken, M. A. G. & Lieshout, C.F.M. (2002). Relational support in families with adolescents, Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 351–62.Google Scholar
Branje, S. J. T., Lieshout, C. F. M. & Aken, M.A.G. (2004). Relations between big five personality characteristics and perceived support in adolescents' families, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 615–28.Google Scholar
Brissette, I., Cohen, S. & Seeman, T. E. (2000). Measuring social integration and social networks. In Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G. & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.). Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 53–85). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J. L., Lakey, B., Tiell, K. & Neely, L. C. (in press). Recipient-provider agreement on enacted support, perceived support and provider personality. Psychological Assessment.
Cohen, S. (1991). Social supports and physical health: symptoms, health behaviors, and infectious diseases. In Greene, E. M A. L.. Cummings, & Karraker, K. H. (Eds.). Life-span developmental psychology: perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 213–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S. & Gwaltnery, J. M. (1997). Social ties and suspectibility to the common cold. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1940–4.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. & Hoberman, H. M. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 99–125.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T. & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In Sarason, I. G. & Sarason, B. R. (Eds.). Social support: theory research and application (pp. 73–94). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Cohen, S., Sherrod, D. R. & Clark, M. S. (1986). Social skills and the stress-protective role of social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 963–73.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–57.Google Scholar
Colby, P. M. & Emmons, R. A. (1997). Openness to emotion as a predictor of perceived, requested, and observer reports of social support. In Pierce, G. R., Lakey, B., Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (Eds.). Sourcebook of social support and personality (pp. 3–18). New York: Plenum Press.
Coriell, M. & Cohen, S. (1995). Concordance in the face of a stressful event: when do members of a dyad agree that one person supported the other?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 289–99.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalizability of scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.
Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. E. (1989). Ratings of social support by adolescents and adult informants: degree of correspondence and prediction of depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 723–30.Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. E., Hessling, R. M. & Suhr, J. A. (1997). The influence of husband and wife personality on marital social support interactions. Personal Relationships, 4, 379–93.Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. E. & Russell, D. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 37–67.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H., Morris, M. M. & Kraus, L. A. (1998). Relationship-specific and global perceptions of social support: associations with well-being and attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 468–81.Google Scholar
Finch, J. F., Barrera, M. Jr., Okun, M. A.et al. (1997). The factor structure of received social support: dimensionality and the prediction of depression and life satisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 323–42.Google Scholar
Finch, J. F., Okun, M. A., Pool, G. J. & Ruehlman, L. S. (1999). Comparison of the influence of conflictual and supportive social interactions on psychological distress. Journal of Personality, 67, 581–621.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. E. J., Iida, M., Bolger, N. & Shrout, P. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–45.Google Scholar
Haber, M. G., Cohen, J. L. & Lucas, T. (February, 2003). The relationship between support behaviors and support perceptions: a meta-analytic review. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.
Joiner, T. E., Jr. (1997). Shyness and low social support as interactive diatheses, with loneliness as mediator: testing an interpersonal-personality view of vulnerability to depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 386–94.Google Scholar
Kaul, M. & Lakey, B. (2003). Where is the support in perceived support? The role of generic relationship satisfaction and enacted support in perceived support's relation to low distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 59–78.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: a social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
Lakey, B., Adams, K., Neely, L.et al. (2002). Perceived support and low emotional distress: the role of enacted support, dyad similarity and provider personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1546–55.Google Scholar
Lakey, B. & Cassady, P. B. (1990). Cognitive processes in perceived social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 337–43.Google Scholar
Lakey, B., McCabe, K. M., Fisicaro, S. A. & Drew, J. B. (1996). Environmental and personal determinants of support perceptions: three generalizability studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1270–80.Google Scholar
Lakey, B., Tardiff, T. & Drew, J. B. (1994). Interpersonal stress: assessment and relations to social support, personality and psychological distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 42–62.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. J. & Lakey, B. (2001). How people make support judgments: individual differences in the traits used to infer supportiveness in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1070–9.Google Scholar
McCaskill, J. & Lakey, B. (2000). Perceived support, social undermining, and emotion: idiosyncratic and shared perspectives of adolescents and their families. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 820–32.Google Scholar
Okun, M. A. & Lockwood, C. M. (2003). Does level of assessment moderate the relation between social support and social negativity?: a meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 15–35.Google Scholar
Pressman, S., Cohen, S., Miller, G. E.et al. (2005). Loneliness, social network size, and immune response to influenza vaccination in college freshmen. Health Psychology, 24, 297–306.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T. & Franks, P. (1994).The role of intimacy and social support in health outcomes: two processes or one?Personal Relationships, 1, 185–97.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. S. & Perrin, N. A. (2004). Mismatches in social support and psychosocial adjustment to breast cancer. Health Psychology, 23, 425–30.Google Scholar
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G. & Gurung, R. A. R. (2001). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: a key to the role of social support. In Sarason, B.R. & Duck, S. (Eds.). Personal relationships: implications for clinical and community psychology (pp. 15–41). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., Hacker, T. A. & Basham, R. B. (1985). Concomitants of social support: social skills, physical attractiveness and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 469–80.Google Scholar
Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: a recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23, 153–8.Google Scholar
Tonga, E. M. W., Bishopa, G. D., Dionga, S. M.et al. (2004). Social support and personality among male police officers in Singapore. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 109–23.Google Scholar
Uchino, B. N. (2004). Social support and physical health outcomes: understanding the health consequences of our relationships. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Vinokur, A., Schul, Y. & Caplan, R. D. (1987). Determinants of perceived social support: interpersonal transactions, personal outlook, and transient affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1137–45.Google Scholar
Wills, T. A. & Ainette, M. G. (2005). Social Support and Health. In Ayers, S., Baum, A., McManus, C.. et al. (Eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health, & Medicine (2nd edn.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wills, T. A. & Shinar, O. (2000). Measuring perceived and received social support. In Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G. & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.). Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 86–135). New York: Oxford University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×