To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter explores the parallel efforts of the CCP and the KWP to train loyal party cadres. This was a critical taks for both parties. It shows how Sino-North Korean friendship was a powerful tool for training the emotions of the party bureaucracy.
The lens is adjusted so that over the next three chapters ICCAJ’s developing views on antisemitism and the Jewish problem are juxtaposed on a shared landscape of UCCLW-WCCIF responses to unfolding Nazi persecution of Jews. Beginning with the ascension of Hitler in January 1933, three events shaped the parameters of response. First, the threat of ecumenical division was reignited in March over Germany’s handling of its Jewish problem, lodging as a permanent feature informing decisions about what could and could not be said about Germany. Second, the introduction of Nazi Aryan legislation began to be viewed as an attack against Christianity, moving the perceived anti-Christian aspects of Nazi antisemitism to the forefront of transnational ecumenical concerns. Third, the September adoption of the Aryan Paragraph by the Prussian Synod and the subsequent outbreak of the Confessing church internal struggle against the Deutsche Christen faction began to be ecumenically explained as a representative fight on behalf of the Church Universal. As this path was being sedulously cut by UCCLW leaders, ICCAJ’s goals remained focused on efforts to educate Protestant audiences about the Jewish problem, convince them of the need for conversionary cure and disseminate theory about the causes of antisemitism. Both before and after enactment of the 1935 Nuremberg Laws and the corresponding increase in Nazi propaganda on ‘Judaisation’, ICCAJ pointed with frequency to a ‘renaissance of Jewishness’, Jewish racial identity with nationalism and increasing atheistic Jews as ‘undeniable entrenchment of Jewry in opposition to Christianity’.
This essay problematizes the place of “culture” in Africa-China studies whereby culture is often sidelined as the devalued supplement to political-economic data. Instead, cultural narratives and processes are inseparable from how knowledge and Africa-China relationality are made. We consider how multi-directional reflexivity about the production of a knowledge object (“Africa-China/China-Africa”) intervenes in both outdated forms of Cold War-inflected area studies and emergent hawkish nationalist scholarship. This essay considers Africa-China as method, an approach based in transregional theorizing and relational analysis that attends to the politics of knowledge production and resists instrumentalization of scholarly findings by imperialist or ethnonationalist agendas.
Chapter 2 serves as an introduction to Wahhabism and Mahdism, which were the ideologies of two respective kinds of revival movements, the former doctrine-oriented and the latter person-oriented. Both, however, stood in opposition to the caliphal discourse. After providing a brief history of the Wahhabi and Sudanese Mahdi movements and a comparison of them, I evaluate their perceptions of “infidel Turks”, whom they deemed to be their main enemy, as a means of shedding light on their religious mission to fight the Ottoman state. By doing so, I also seek to show why the Ottomans saw those ideas as threats. Wahhabism and Mahdism entailed rebellion, and as a means of demonstrating the dangers they posed for the Ottomans, I discuss how the two revival movements tapped into global networks via the tools of steam and print.
Canonization proceedings underwent dramatic changes during the early modern period in response to scathing external criticism and a growing internal demand for new saints. This chapter explores how these stringent new rules shored up papal authority and redefined Catholic practices of veneration, by complicating the path to sainthood for centuries to come.
As claims of German collective guilt for World War II spewed from both sides of the Atlantic in early 1945, WCCIF principals were occupied with circumventing the war guilt divisions of World War I, and ICCAJ was immersed in the work of reconstructing Jewish missions on the Continent. Chapter 5 examines in detail how each argued for co-responsibility and universal guilt of Christianity for failing to prevent the war, and how each was related to expansion of pre-war goals. It reconstructs from archival sources the highly orchestrated strategies of WCCIF to secure ‘a formal entente’ of reconciliation between the German Protestant church and churches of countries that suffered due to Germany – which came to be known as the Stuttgart Declaration of Guilt. On a coordinate plane of lobbying, arguments for postwar expansion of Jewish missions were linked to Christianity’s failure to prevent Nazi extermination of European Jews. ICCAJ lobbied robustly that the failure of the Christian world to raise its voice sufficiently during the Nazi onslaught gave new cause and reason for reparatory expansion of Jewish evangelisation. Within these frameworks of understanding, postwar mission planning was contoured to fit the 1948 constitutional founding of the World Council of Churches, with the mutual goal of evangelising surviving Jewry in WCC constituency countries.
This article critically examines the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) ruling on the preliminary objections in Sudan v. United Arab Emirates, focusing on the implications of the UAE’s reservation to Article IX of the Genocide Convention. It evaluates the Court’s interpretation of the scope and effect of such reservations, contrasting it with precedents set in Bosnia v. Serbia and The Gambia v. Myanmar. Drawing on the ICJ’s jurisprudence, principles of state responsibility, and international criminal law, the article highlights significant tensions and ambiguities in the Court’s approach to admissibility, complicity, and provisional measures. The study incorporates insights from the International Criminal Court and UN Human Rights Council resolutions to contextualise the legal and factual matrix. Ultimately, it argues for a more coherent doctrinal framework to address the impact of reservations on treaty obligations and jurisdictional competence in genocide-related disputes.
Devotional objects, such as rosaries, medals, and relics, have always stood at the heart of the Catholic veneration of saints. Using two Bavarian rosaries as a case study, this chapter examines how such material objects allowed individual believers to tailor their faith in tactile ways, linking their devotions to wider trends within global Catholicism.