Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-5dd2w Total loading time: 0.274 Render date: 2022-05-23T21:33:04.493Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Time, flow, and space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

Craig Callender*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093. ccallender@ucsd.eduwww.craigcallender.com

Abstract

Does a temporal dual process theory explain the illusive flow of time? I point out one shortcoming of such a theory and propose an alternative that does not require either dual cognitive processes or demand such a stark asymmetry between space and time in the brain.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, A. (2013) Decoding Space and Time in the Brain, Scientific American MIND. Available at https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/decoding-space-and-time-in-the-brain/.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (2017) What makes time special? Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198797302.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, J. E. (1908) The unreality of time. Mind 17(4):457–74. doi:10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. (2011) The flow of time. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time, ed. Callender, C., pp. 276311. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199298204.003.0010.Google Scholar
Sloman, S. A. (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119(1):322. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review 90(4):293315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, D. (2006) So it goes. The Amherst lecture in philosophy. http://www.amherstlecture.org/velleman2006/.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Time, flow, and space
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Time, flow, and space
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Time, flow, and space
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *