QuickSelect (also known as Find), introduced by Hoare ((1961) Commun. ACM 4 321–322.), is a randomized algorithm for selecting a specified order statistic from an input sequence of $n$ objects, or rather their identifying labels usually known as keys. The keys can be numeric or symbol strings, or indeed any labels drawn from a given linearly ordered set. We discuss various ways in which the cost of comparing two keys can be measured, and we can measure the efficiency of the algorithm by the total cost of such comparisons.

We define and discuss a closely related algorithm known as QuickVal and a natural probabilistic model for the input to this algorithm; QuickVal searches (almost surely unsuccessfully) for a specified population quantile $\alpha \in [0, 1]$ in an input sample of size $n$. Call the total cost of comparisons for this algorithm $S_n$. We discuss a natural way to define the random variables $S_1, S_2, \ldots$ on a common probability space. For a general class of cost functions, Fill and Nakama ((2013) Adv. Appl. Probab. 45 425–450.) proved under mild assumptions that the scaled cost $S_n / n$ of QuickVal converges in $L^p$ and almost surely to a limit random variable $S$. For a general cost function, we consider what we term the QuickVal residual:

\begin{equation*} \rho _n \,{:\!=}\, \frac {S_n}n - S. \end{equation*}

The residual is of natural interest, especially in light of the previous analogous work on the sorting algorithm QuickSort (Bindjeme and Fill (2012) 23rd International Meeting on Probabilistic, Combinatorial, and Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis of Algorithms (AofA'12), Discrete Mathematics, and Theoretical Computer Science Proceedings, AQ, Association: Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Nancy, pp. 339–348; Neininger (2015) Random Struct. Algorithms 46 346–361; Fuchs (2015) Random Struct. Algorithms 46 677–687; Grübel and Kabluchko (2016) Ann. Appl. Probab. 26 3659–3698; Sulzbach (2017) Random Struct. Algorithms 50 493–508). In the case $\alpha = 0$ of QuickMin with unit cost per key-comparison, we are able to calculate–àla Bindjeme and Fill for QuickSort (Bindjeme and Fill (2012) 23rd International Meeting on Probabilistic, Combinatorial, and Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis of Algorithms (AofA'12), Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science Proceedings, AQ, Association: Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Nancy, pp. 339–348.)–the exact (and asymptotic) $L^2$-norm of the residual. We take the result as motivation for the scaling factor $\sqrt {n}$ for the QuickVal residual for general population quantiles and for general cost. We then prove in general (under mild conditions on the cost function) that $\sqrt {n}\,\rho _n$ converges in law to a scale mixture of centered Gaussians, and we also prove convergence of moments.

The hard-core model has as its configurations the independent sets of some graph instance $G$. The probability distribution on independent sets is controlled by a ‘fugacity’ $\lambda \gt 0$, with higher $\lambda$ leading to denser configurations. We investigate the mixing time of Glauber (single-site) dynamics for the hard-core model on restricted classes of bounded-degree graphs in which a particular graph $H$ is excluded as an induced subgraph. If $H$ is a subdivided claw then, for all $\lambda$, the mixing time is $O(n\log n)$, where $n$ is the order of $G$. This extends a result of Chen and Gu for claw-free graphs. When $H$ is a path, the set of possible instances is finite. For all other $H$, the mixing time is exponential in $n$ for sufficiently large $\lambda$, depending on $H$ and the maximum degree of $G$.

We present an explicit subset $A\subseteq \mathbb{N} = \{0,1,\ldots \}$ such that $A + A = \mathbb{N}$ and for all $\varepsilon \gt 0$,

\begin{equation*}\lim _{N\to \infty }\frac {\big |\big \{(n_1,n_2): n_1 + n_2 = N, (n_1,n_2)\in A^2\big \}\big |}{N^{\varepsilon }} = 0.\end{equation*}

This answers a question of Erdős.

The Erdős–Simonovits stability theorem is one of the most widely used theorems in extremal graph theory. We obtain an Erdős–Simonovits type stability theorem in multi-partite graphs. Different from the Erdős–Simonovits stability theorem, our stability theorem in multi-partite graphs says that if the number of edges of an $H$-free graph $G$ is close to the extremal graphs for $H$, then $G$ has a well-defined structure but may be far away from the extremal graphs for $H$. As applications, we strengthen a theorem of Bollobás, Erdős, and Straus and solve a conjecture in a stronger form posed by Han and Zhao concerning the maximum number of edges in multi-partite graphs which does not contain vertex-disjoint copies of a clique.

We consider the hypergraph Turán problem of determining $ex(n, S^d)$, the maximum number of facets in a $d$-dimensional simplicial complex on $n$ vertices that does not contain a simplicial $d$-sphere (a homeomorph of $S^d$) as a subcomplex. We show that if there is an affirmative answer to a question of Gromov about sphere enumeration in high dimensions, then $ex(n, S^d) \geq \Omega (n^{d + 1 - (d + 1)/(2^{d + 1} - 2)})$. Furthermore, this lower bound holds unconditionally for 2-LC (locally constructible) spheres, which includes all shellable spheres and therefore all polytopes. We also prove an upper bound on $ex(n, S^d)$ of $O(n^{d + 1 - 1/2^{d - 1}})$ using a simple induction argument. We conjecture that the upper bound can be improved to match the conditional lower bound.

Let $\Sigma$ be an alphabet and $\mu$ be a distribution on $\Sigma ^k$ for some $k \geqslant 2$. Let $\alpha \gt 0$ be the minimum probability of a tuple in the support of $\mu$ (denoted $\mathsf{supp}(\mu )$). We treat the parameters $\Sigma , k, \mu , \alpha$ as fixed and constant. We say that the distribution $\mu$ has a linear embedding if there exist an Abelian group $G$ (with the identity element $0_G$) and mappings $\sigma _i : \Sigma \rightarrow G$, $1 \leqslant i \leqslant k$, such that at least one of the mappings is non-constant and for every $(a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_k)\in \mathsf{supp}(\mu )$, $\sum _{i=1}^k \sigma _i(a_i) = 0_G$. In [Bhangale-Khot-Minzer, STOC 2022], the authors asked the following analytical question. Let $f_i: \Sigma ^n\rightarrow [\!-1,1]$ be bounded functions, such that at least one of the functions $f_i$ essentially has degree at least $d$, meaning that the Fourier mass of $f_i$ on terms of degree less than $d$ is at most $\delta$. If $\mu$ has no linear embedding (over any Abelian group), then is it necessarily the case that

\begin{equation*}\left | \mathop {\mathbb{E}}_{({\textbf {x}}_1, {\textbf {x}}_2, \ldots , {\textbf {x}}_k)\sim \mu ^{\otimes n}}[f_1({\textbf {x}}_1)f_2({\textbf {x}}_2)\cdots f_k({\textbf {x}}_k)] \right | = o_{d, \delta }(1),\end{equation*}

$\to 0$

$d \to \infty$

$\delta \to 0$

In this paper, we answer this analytical question fully and in the affirmative for $k=3$. We also show the following two applications of the result.

1. 1. The first application is related to hardness of approximation. Using the reduction from [5], we show that for every $3$-ary predicate $P:\Sigma ^3 \to \{0,1\}$ such that $P$ has no linear embedding, an SDP (semi-definite programming) integrality gap instance of a $P$-Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) instance with gap $(1,s)$ can be translated into a dictatorship test with completeness $1$ and soundness $s+o(1)$, under certain additional conditions on the instance.

2. 2. The second application is related to additive combinatorics. We show that if the distribution $\mu$ on $\Sigma ^3$ has no linear embedding, marginals of $\mu$ are uniform on $\Sigma$, and $(a,a,a)\in \texttt{supp}(\mu )$ for every $a\in \Sigma$, then every large enough subset of $\Sigma ^n$ contains a triple $({\textbf {x}}_1, {\textbf {x}}_2,{\textbf {x}}_3)$ from $\mu ^{\otimes n}$ (and in fact a significant density of such triples).

The Erdős-Sós Conjecture states that every graph with average degree exceeding $k-1$ contains every tree with $k$ edges as a subgraph. We prove that there are $\delta \gt 0$ and $k_0\in \mathbb N$ such that the conjecture holds for every tree $T$ with $k \ge k_0$ edges and every graph $G$ with $|V(G)| \le (1+\delta )|V(T)|$.