This article proposes sequential randomized tests to locate the presence of jumps on the paths of efficient asset prices in a continuous-time model. The randomized statistics are generated by artificially adding randomness to the robust approximations of the locally averaged returns of the efficient price. In the case of finite activity jumps, we derive the asymptotic distribution of the maximum of all the local statistics unaffected by jumps, which makes it feasible to control the limiting probability of the global type I error and demonstrate the power of the test. We also present the theoretical results to illustrate the behaviors of the test statistics in the presence of infinite activity jumps. Simulation studies indicate the favorable performance of the proposed test in finite samples, and we also apply the test to the stock price data of Apple and Microsoft.

Marco Lippi was born in Rome in 1943. An indefatigable and inspiring pedagogue, he has been teaching mathematics, economics, the history of economic thought, and econometrics to generations of students at the Universities of Perugia, Rome (La Sapienza, Tor Vergata, and LUISS), Modena, the Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna in Pisa, and the European Center for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES) in Brussels. As a fellow of the Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance (EIEF), he still teaches, with the indomitable enthusiasm that has become legendary among his students and colleagues, Master and Ph.D. courses offered by this renowned Roman institution.

We consider instrumental variables (IV) estimation of a possibly infinite order dynamic panel autoregressive (AR) process with individual effects. The estimation is based on the sieve AR approximation, with its lag order increasing with sample size. Transforming the variable to eliminate individual effects generates an endogeneity problem, particularly when the time series is only moderately long. IV approaches are useful to obtain well-behaved estimators in panels with large cross sections. We establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the IV estimators, including the Anderson-Hsiao, generalized method of moments, and double filter IV (DFIV) estimators. The theoretical results are obtained under homoskedasticity using double asymptotics under which both the cross-sectional sample size and the length of the time series tend to infinity. The finite-sample performance of the estimators is examined using Monte Carlo simulation. Our preferred estimator is the DFIV estimator, as it exhibits excellent performance in terms of bias and coverage probability, despite its finite-sample distribution being relatively dispersed.

This article studies uniform inference on a function $g(\cdot )$ and its functionals in a nonparametric panel data model with fixed effects. The nonparametric panel model relaxes restrictions on time-series behavior by allowing for arbitrary types of stationary or nonstationary dependence (e.g., stationary mixingale, mildly stationary, or local-to-unity process). After removing the fixed effects via transformations, a sieve estimator is proposed, accompanied by Yurinskii’s coupling principle of Gaussian processes and uniform confidence bands (UCBs) that rely on the sieve score bootstrap method to test for linear functionals of $g(\cdot )$. Under the asymptotic framework of an increasing cross-sectional dimension and either a fixed or diverging time dimension, we prove that the bootstrapping Kolmogorov–Smirnov (sup-type) test has asymptotic uniform size controls. This article shows that our uniform inference procedure can be extended to the two-way fixed-effects nonparametric panel model with stationary mixingale regressors. Extensive simulations confirm that our sieve estimators and their UCBs work well in finite samples. The present article further applies the above methods to empirical settings and finds some interesting results in nonlinear patterns of consumption concerning income shocks and asset holdings.

In high-dimensional (HD) sparse linear regression, parameter selection and estimation are addressed using a constraint $l_0$ on the direction of the parameter vector. We begin by establishing a general result that identifies this direction through the leading generalized eigenspace of specific measurable matrices. Using this result, we propose a novel approach to the selection of the best subsets by solving an empirical generalized eigenvalue problem to estimate the direction of the HD parameter. We then introduce a new estimator based on the RIFLE algorithm, providing a non-asymptotic bound for the estimation risk, minimax convergence, and a central limit theorem. Simulations demonstrate the superiority of our method over existing $l_0$-constrained estimators.

This article proposes and studies two Huber-type estimation approaches, namely, the Huber instrumental variable (IV) estimation and the Huber generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation, for a spatial autoregressive model. We establish the consistency, asymptotic distributions, finite sample breakdown points, and influence functions of these estimators. Simulation studies show that compared to the corresponding traditional estimators (the two-stage least squares estimator, the best IV estimator, and the GMM estimator), our estimators are more robust when the unknown disturbances are long-tailed, and our estimators only lose a little efficiency when the disturbances are short-tailed. Moreover, the Huber GMM estimator also outperforms several robust estimators in the literature. Finally, we apply our estimation method to investigate the impact of the urban heat island effect on housing prices. A package is published on GitHub for practitioners to use in their empirical studies.

A general asymptotic theory is established for sample cross moments of nonstationary time series, allowing for long-range dependence and local unit roots. The theory provides a substantial extension of earlier results on nonparametric regression that include near-cointegrated nonparametric regression as well as spurious nonparametric regression. Many new models are covered by the limit theory, among which are functional coefficient regressions in which both regressors and the functional covariate are nonstationary. Simulations show finite sample performance matching well with the asymptotic theory and having broad relevance to applications, while revealing how dual nonstationarity in regressors and covariates raises sensitivity to bandwidth choice and the impact of dimensionality in nonparametric regression. An empirical example is provided involving climate data regression to assess Earth’s climate sensitivity to CO$_2$, where nonstationarity is a prominent feature of both the regressors and covariates in the model. To our knowledge, this application is the first nonparametric empirical analysis to assess potential nonlinear impacts of CO$_2$ on Earth’s climate while allowing for nonstationarity in both the regressors and covariates.

We develop a methodology for conducting inference on extreme quantiles of unobserved individual heterogeneity (e.g., heterogeneous coefficients and treatment effects) in panel data and meta-analysis settings. Inference is challenging in such settings: only noisy estimates of heterogeneity are available, and central limit approximations perform poorly in the tails. We derive a necessary and sufficient condition under which noisy estimates are informative about extreme quantiles, along with sufficient rate and moment conditions. Under these conditions, we establish an extreme value theorem and an intermediate order theorem for noisy estimates. These results yield simple optimization-free confidence intervals (CIs) for extreme quantiles. Simulations show that our CIs have favorable coverage and that the rate conditions matter for the validity of inference. We illustrate the method with an application to firm productivity differences across areas of varying population density. By analyzing the left tails of the productivity distributions, we find no evidence of stronger firm selection in more densely populated areas.

Pretesting for exogeneity has become routine in many empirical applications involving instrumental variables (IVs) to decide whether the ordinary least squares or IV-based method is appropriate. Guggenberger (2010a, Econometric Theory, 26, 369–382) shows that the second-stage test – based on the outcome of a Durbin-Wu-Hausman-type pretest in the first stage – exhibits extreme size distortion, with asymptotic size equal to 1 when the standard critical values are used. In this paper, we first show that both conditional and unconditional on the data, standard wild bootstrap procedures are invalid for two-stage testing. Second, we propose an identification-robust two-stage test statistic that switches between OLS-based and weak-IV-robust statistics. Third, we develop a size-adjusted wild bootstrap approach for our two-stage test that integrates specific wild bootstrap critical values with an appropriate size-adjustment method. We establish uniform validity of this procedure under conditional heteroskedasticity or clustering in the sense that the resulting tests achieve correct asymptotic size, regardless of whether the identification is strong or weak. Our procedure is especially valuable for empirical researchers facing potential weak identification. In such settings, its power advantage is notable: whereas weak-IV-robust methods maintain correct size but often suffer from relatively low power, our approach achieves better performance.

This article studies the principal component analysis (PCA) estimation of weak factor models with sparse loadings. We uncover an intrinsic near-sparsity preservation property for the PCA estimators of loadings, which comes from the approximately (block) upper triangular structure of the rotation matrix. It suggests an asymmetric relationship among factors: the sparsity of the rotated loadings for a stronger factor can be contaminated by the loadings from weaker ones, but the sparsity of the rotated loadings of a weaker factor is almost unaffected by the loadings of stronger ones. Then, we propose a simple alternative to the existing penalized approaches to sparsify the loading estimators by screening out the small PCA loading estimators directly, and construct consistent estimators for factor strengths. The proposed estimators perform well in finite samples, as shown by a set of Monte Carlo simulations.

In a recent paper, Juodis and Reese (2022, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 40, 1191–1203) (JR) show that the application of the CD test proposed by Pesaran (2004, General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels, CWPE 0435, Cambridge) to residuals from panels with latent factors results in over-rejection. They propose a randomized test statistic to correct for over-rejection, and add a screening component to achieve power. This article considers the same problem but from a different perspective and shows that the standard CD test remains valid if the latent factors are weak. A bias-corrected version, CD$^{\ast}$, is proposed which is shown to be asymptotically standard normal under the null of error cross-sectional independence which has power against network-type alternatives. This result is shown to hold for pure latent factor models as well as for panel regression models with latent factors. The case where the errors are serially correlated is also considered. Small sample properties of the CD$^{\ast}$ test are investigated by Monte Carlo experiments and are shown to have satisfactory small sample properties. In an empirical application, using the CD$^{\ast}$ test, it is shown that there remains spatial error dependence in a panel data model for real house price changes across 377 Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States, even after the effects of latent factors are filtered out.

Panel data often contain stayers and slow movers. The literature proposes an estimator for the average partial effects (APEs) for this setting without a formal theory. The literature is also silent about inference in the presence of stayers and many slow movers. We contribute to this state of the art. First, we develop an asymptotic theory to guarantee that such an estimator is consistent in the presence of stayers and slow movers. Second, we propose its standard error. Third, we relax the existing assumption to allow for “many” slow movers. Fourth, we generalize the existing estimator. Fifth, we establish that this generalized estimator can achieve larger extents of bias reduction and hence faster convergence rates. Simulation studies demonstrate that the conventional 95% confidence interval covers the true value of the APE with 37%–93% frequencies whereas our proposed one achieves 93%–96% coverage frequencies. Using the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we find that estimates of the marginal propensity to consume based on our generalized estimator remarkably differ in values from those of the existing estimators. Moreover, the generalized estimator achieves more than three times as small standard errors as those of the existing robust estimator.

A first-order Gaussian autoregressive model is considered. The exact finite-sample joint density of the minimal sufficient statistic is derived, for any value of the autoregressive parameter. This allows us to derive explicitly the exact density of the autocorrelation coefficient and its Studentized t-ratio, whose densities were available only in the asymptotic case and not for all values of the parameter and the statistic. This article also demonstrates how to solve a general problem in statistical distribution theory (well beyond the specific case of autoregressive models), that of inverting confluent characteristic functions in multiple variables.

This article presents novel methods and theories for estimation and inference about parameters in statistical models using machine learning for nuisance parameter estimation when data are dyadic. We propose a dyadic cross-fitting method to remove over-fitting biases under arbitrary dyadic dependence. Together with the use of Neyman orthogonal scores, this novel cross-fitting method enables root-n consistent estimation and inference robustly against dyadic dependence. We demonstrate its versatility by applying it to high-dimensional network formation models and reexamine the determinants of free trade agreements.

This article provides a general asymptotic theory for mildly explosive autoregression. We confirm that Cauchy limit theory remains invariant across a broad range of error processes, including general linear processes with martingale difference innovations, stationary causal processes, and nonlinear autoregressive time series, such as threshold autoregressive and bilinear models. Our results unify the Cauchy limit theory for long memory, short memory, and anti-persistent innovations within a single framework. Notably, we demonstrate that in the presence of anti-persistent innovations, the Cauchy limit theory may be violated when the regression coefficient approaches the local-to-unity range. Additionally, we explore extensions to models with varying drift, which is of significant interest in its own right.

This article develops a new test to detect changes in generalized autoregressive conditionally heteroscedastic (GARCH(1,1)) processes without imposing a stationary assumption. Specifically, the procedure tests the null hypothesis of a GARCH process with constant parameters, either in (strictly) stationary or explosive regimes, against the alternative hypothesis of parameter changes. We derive the limiting distribution of the test statistics and establish their asymptotic consistency. Monte Carlo simulations show that the proposed test has good size control and high power. We demonstrate a prototype application on a small group of stocks and report a further extensive application to more than ten thousand U.S. stocks.

This article proposes a local projection (LP) residual bootstrap method to construct confidence intervals for impulse response coefficients of AR(1) models. Our bootstrap method is based on the LP approach and involves a residual bootstrap procedure applied to AR(1) models. We present theoretical results for our bootstrap method and proposed confidence intervals. First, we prove the uniform consistency of the LP-residual bootstrap over a large class of AR(1) models that allow for a unit root, conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form, and martingale difference shocks. Then, we prove the asymptotic validity of our confidence intervals over the same class of AR(1) models. Finally, we show that the LP-residual bootstrap provides asymptotic refinements for confidence intervals on a restricted class of AR(1) models relative to those required for the uniform consistency of our bootstrap.

We propose a one-to-many matching estimator of the average treatment effect based on propensity scores estimated by isotonic regression. This approach is predicated on the assumption of monotonicity in the propensity score function, a condition that can be justified in many economic applications. We show that the nature of the isotonic estimator can help us to fix many problems of existing matching methods, including efficiency, choice of the number of matches, choice of tuning parameters, robustness to propensity score misspecification, and bootstrap validity. As a by-product, a uniformly consistent isotonic estimator is developed for our proposed matching method.

Detecting multiple structural breaks at unknown dates is a central challenge in time-series econometrics. Step-indicator saturation (SIS) addresses this challenge during model selection, and we develop its asymptotic theory for tuning parameter choice. We study its frequency gauge—the false detection rate—and show it is consistent and asymptotically normal. Simulations suggest that a smaller gauge minimizes bias in post-selection regression estimates. For the small gauge situation, we develop a complementary Poisson theory. We compare the local power of SIS to detect shifts with that of Andrews’ break test. We find that SIS excels when breaks are near the sample end or closely spaced. An application to U.K. labor productivity reveals a growth slowdown after the 2008 financial crisis.