The class of all $\ast $-continuous Kleene algebras, whose description includes an infinitary condition on the iteration operator, plays an important role in computer science. The complexity of reasoning in such algebras—ranging from the equational theory to the Horn one, with restricted fragments of the latter in between—was analyzed by Kozen (2002). This paper deals with similar problems for $\ast $-continuous residuated Kleene lattices, also called $\ast $-continuous action lattices, where the product operation is augmented by residuals. We prove that, in the presence of residuals, the fragment of the corresponding Horn theory with $\ast $-free hypotheses has the same complexity as the $\omega ^\omega $ iteration of the halting problem, and hence is properly hyperarithmetical. We also prove that if only commutativity conditions are allowed as hypotheses, then the complexity drops down to $\Pi ^0_1$ (i.e., the complement of the halting problem), which is the same as that for $\ast $-continuous Kleene algebras. In fact, we get stronger upper bound results: the fragments under consideration are translated into suitable fragments of infinitary action logic with exponentiation, and our upper bounds are obtained for the latter ones.

In this work, we investigate various combinatorial properties of Borel ideals on countable sets. We extend a theorem presented in [13] and identify an $F_\sigma $ tall ideal in which player II has a winning strategy in the Cut and Choose Game, thereby addressing a question posed by J. Zapletal. Additionally, we explore the Ramsey properties of ideals, demonstrating that the random graph ideal is critical for the Ramsey property when considering more than two colors. The previously known result for two colors is extended to any finite number of colors. Furthermore, we comment on the Solecki ideal and identify an $F_\sigma $ tall K-uniform ideal that is not equivalent to $\mathcal {ED}_{\text {fin}}$, thereby addressing a question from M. Hrušák’s work [10].

In this paper, we show that the existence of certain first-countable compact-like extensions is equivalent to the equality between corresponding cardinal characteristics of the continuum. For instance, $\mathfrak b=\mathfrak s=\mathfrak c$ if and only if every regular first-countable space of weight $< \mathfrak c$ can be densely embedded into a regular first-countable countably compact space.

Let $\operatorname {TFAb}_r$ be the class of torsion-free abelian groups of rank r, and let $\operatorname {FD}_r$ be the class of fields of characteristic $0$ and transcendence degree r. We compare these classes using various notions. Considering the Scott complexity of the structures in the classes and the complexity of the isomorphism relations on the classes, the classes seem very similar. Hjorth and Thomas showed that the $\operatorname {TFAb}_r$ are strictly increasing under Borel reducibility. This is not so for the classes $\operatorname {FD}_r$. Thomas and Velickovic showed that for sufficiently large r, the classes $\operatorname {FD}_r$ are equivalent under Borel reducibility. We try to compare the groups with the fields, using Borel reducibility, and also using some effective variants. We give functorial Turing computable embeddings of $\operatorname {TFAb}_r$ in $\operatorname {FD}_r$, and of $\operatorname {FD}_r$ in $\operatorname {FD}_{r+1}$. We show that under computable countable reducibility, $\operatorname {TFAb}_1$ lies on top among the classes we are considering. In fact, under computable countable reducibility, isomorphism on $\operatorname {TFAb}_1$ lies on top among equivalence relations that are effective $\Sigma _3$.

This paper studies which truth-values are most likely to be taken on finite models by arbitrary sentences of a many-valued predicate logic. The classical zero-one law (independently proved by Fagin and Glebskiĭ et al.) states that every sentence in a purely relational language is almost surely false or almost surely true, meaning that the probability that the formula is true in a randomly chosen finite structures of cardinal n is asymptotically $0$ or $1$ as n grows to infinity. We obtain generalizations of this result for any logic with values in a finite lattice-ordered algebra, and for some infinitely valued logics, including Łukasiewicz logic. The finitely valued case is reduced to the classical one through a uniform translation and Oberschelp’s generalization of the zero-one law. Moreover, it is shown that the complexity of determining the almost sure value of a given sentence is PSPACE-complete (generalizing Grandjean’s result for the classical case), and for some logics we describe completely the set of truth-values that can be taken by sentences almost surely.

We study versions of the tree pigeonhole principle, $\mathsf {TT}^1$, in the context of Weihrauch-style computable analysis. The principle has previously been the subject of extensive research in reverse mathematics, an outstanding question of which investigation is whether $\mathsf {TT}^1$ is $\Pi ^1_1$-conservative over the ordinary pigeonhole principle, $\mathsf {RT}^1$. Using the recently introduced notion of the first-order part of an instance-solution problem, we formulate the analog of this question for Weihrauch reducibility, and give an affirmative answer. In combination with other results, we use this to show that unlike $\mathsf {RT}^1$, the problem $\mathsf {TT}^1$ is not Weihrauch requivalent to any first-order problem. Our proofs develop new combinatorial machinery for constructing and understanding solutions to instances of $\mathsf {TT}^1$.

We characterize the epimorphisms in homotopy type theory (HoTT) as the fiberwise acyclic maps and develop a type-theoretic treatment of acyclic maps and types in the context of synthetic homotopy theory as developed in univalent foundations. We present examples and applications in group theory, such as the acyclicity of the Higman group, through the identification of groups with 0-connected, pointed 1-types. Many of our results are formalized as part of the agda-unimath library.

A central topic in mathematical logic is the classification of theorems from mathematics in hierarchies according to their logical strength. Ideally, the place of a theorem in a hierarchy does not depend on the representation (aka coding) used. In this paper, we show that the standard representation of compact metric spaces in second-order arithmetic has a profound effect. To this end, we study basic theorems for such spaces like a continuous function has a supremum and a countable set has measure zero. We show that these and similar third-order statements imply at least Feferman’s highly non-constructive projection principle, and even full second-order arithmetic or countable choice in some cases. When formulated with representations (aka codes), the associated second-order theorems are provable in rather weak fragments of second-order arithmetic. Thus, we arrive at the slogan that

$$ \begin{align*} {coding\ compact\ metric\ spaces\ in\ the\ language\ of\ second\text{-}order\ arithmetic\ can\ be\ as\ hard }\\ {as\ second\text{-}order\ arithmetic\ or\ countable\ choice}. \end{align*} $$

We believe every mathematician should be aware of this slogan, as central foundational topics in mathematics make use of the standard second-order representation of compact metric spaces. In the process of collecting evidence for the above slogan, we establish a number of equivalences involving Feferman’s projection principle and countable choice. We also study generalisations to fourth-order arithmetic and beyond with similar-but-stronger results.

We investigate natural variations of behaviourally correct learning and explanatory learning—two learning paradigms studied in algorithmic learning theory—that allow us to “learn” equivalence relations on Polish spaces. We give a characterization of the learnable equivalence relations in terms of their Borel complexity and show that the behaviourally correct and explanatory learnable equivalence relations coincide both in uniform and non-uniform versions of learnability and provide a characterization of the learnable equivalence relations in terms of their Borel complexity. We also show that the set of uniformly learnable equivalence relations is $\boldsymbol {\Pi }^1_1$-complete in the codes and study the learnability of several equivalence relations arising naturally in logic as a case study.

Given a Polish group G, let $E(G)$ be the right coset equivalence relation $G^\omega /c(G)$, where $c(G)$ is the group of all convergent sequences in G. We first established two results:

1. (1) Let $G,H$ be two Polish groups. If H is TSI but G is not, then $E(G)\not \le _BE(H)$.

2. (2) Let G be a Polish group. Then the following are equivalent: (a) G is TSI non-archimedean; (b)$E(G)\leq _B E_0^\omega $; and (c) $E(G)\leq _B {\mathbb {R}}^\omega /c_0$. In particular, $E(G)\sim _B E_0^\omega $ iff G is TSI uncountable non-archimedean.

A critical theorem presented in this article is as follows: Let G be a TSI Polish group, and let H be a closed subgroup of the product of a sequence of TSI strongly NSS Polish groups. If $E(G)\le _BE(H)$, then there exists a continuous homomorphism $S:G_0\rightarrow H$ such that $\ker (S)$ is non-archimedean, where $G_0$ is the connected component of the identity of G. The converse holds if G is connected, $S(G)$ is closed in H, and the interval $[0,1]$ can be embedded into H.

As its applications, we prove several Rigid theorems for TSI Lie groups, locally compact Polish groups, separable Banach spaces, and separable Fréchet spaces, respectively.

We analyze a countable support product of a free Suslin tree which turns it into a highly rigid Kurepa tree with no Aronszajn subtree. In the process, we introduce a new rigidity property for trees, which says roughly speaking that any non-trivial strictly increasing function from a section of the tree into itself maps into a cofinal branch.

We show that in the Silver model the inequality $\mathrm {cov}(\mathfrak {C} _2) < \mathrm {cov}(\mathfrak {P}_2)$ holds true, where $\mathfrak {C}_2$ and $\mathfrak {P}_2$ are the two-dimensional Mycielski ideals.

In [2], Pillay introduced definable Galois cohomology, a model-theoretic generalization of Galois cohomology. Let M be an atomic and strongly $\omega $-homogeneous structure over a set of parameters A. Let B be a normal extension of A in M. We show that a short exact sequence of automorphism groups $1 \to \operatorname {\mathrm {Aut}}(M/B) \to \operatorname {\mathrm {Aut}}(M/A) \to \operatorname {\mathrm {Aut}}(B/A) \to 1$ induces a short exact sequence in definable Galois cohomology. We also discuss compatibilities with [3]. Our result complements the long exact sequence in definable Galois cohomology developed in [4].

This is a continuation of the paper [J. Symb. Log. 87 (2022), 1065–1092]. For an ideal $\mathcal {I}$ on $\omega $ we denote $\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}=\{f\in \omega ^{\omega }: f^{-1}[\{n\}]\in \mathcal {I} \text { for every } n\in \omega \}$ and write $f\leq _{\mathcal {I}} g$ if $\{n\in \omega :f(n)>g(n)\}\in \mathcal {I}$, where $f,g\in \omega ^{\omega }$.

We study the cardinal numbers $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))$ describing the smallest sizes of subsets of $\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}$ that are unbounded from below with respect to $\leq _{\mathcal {I}}$.

In particular, we examine the relationships of $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))$ with the dominating number $\mathfrak {d}$. We show that, consistently, $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))>\mathfrak {d}$ for some ideal $\mathcal {I}$, however $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))\leq \mathfrak {d}$ for all analytic ideals $\mathcal {I}$. Moreover, we give example of a Borel ideal with $\mathfrak {b}(\geq _{\mathcal {I}}\cap (\mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}} \times \mathcal {D}_{\mathcal {I}}))=\operatorname {\mathrm {add}}(\mathcal {M})$.

A left-variable word over an alphabet A is a word over $A \cup \{\star \}$ whose first letter is the distinguished symbol $\star $ standing for a placeholder. The ordered variable word theorem ($\mathsf {OVW}$), also known as Carlson–Simpson’s theorem, is a tree partition theorem, stating that for every finite alphabet A and every finite coloring of the words over A, there exists a word $c_0$ and an infinite sequence of left-variable words $w_1, w_2, \dots $ such that $\{ c_0 \cdot w_1[a_1] \cdot \dots \cdot w_k[a_k] : k \in \mathbb {N}, a_1, \dots , a_k \in A \}$ is monochromatic.

In this article, we prove that $\mathsf {OVW}$ is $\Pi ^0_4$-conservative over $\mathsf {RCA}_0 + \mathsf {B}\Sigma ^0_2$. This implies in particular that $\mathsf {OVW}$ does not imply $\mathsf {ACA}_0$ over $\mathsf {RCA}_0$. This is the first principle for which the only known separation from $\mathsf {ACA}_0$ involves non-standard models.

We consider equational theories based on axioms for recursively defining functions, with rules for equality and substitution, but no form of induction—we denote such equational theories as PETS for pure equational theories with substitution. An example is Cook’s system PV without its rule for induction. We show that the Bounded Arithmetic theory $\mathrm {S}^{1}_2$ proves the consistency of PETS. Our approach employs model-theoretic constructions for PETS based on approximate values resembling notions from domain theory in Bounded Arithmetic, which may be of independent interest.

In $\mathsf {ZF}$ (i.e., Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory minus the axiom of choice ($\mathsf {AC}$)), we investigate the open problem of the deductive strength of the principle

which was introduced by Herzberg, Kanovei, Katz, and Lyubetsky [(2018), Journal of Symbolic Logic, 83(1), 385–391]. Typical results are:

1. (1) “$\aleph _{1}\leq 2^{\aleph _{0}}$” is strictly weaker than $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

2. (2) “There exists a free ultrafilter on $\omega $” does not imply “$\aleph _{1}\leq 2^{\aleph _{0}}$” in $\mathsf {ZF}$, and thus (by (1)) neither does it imply $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ in $\mathsf {ZF}$. This fills the gap in information in Howard and Rubin [Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 1998], as well as in Herzberg et al. (2018).

3. (3) Martin’s Axiom ($\mathsf {MA}$) implies “no free ultrafilter on $\omega $ has a well-orderable base of cardinality $<2^{\aleph _{0}}$”, and the latter principle is not implied by $\aleph _{0}$-Martin’s Axiom ($\mathsf {MA}(\aleph _{0})$) in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

4. (4) $\mathsf {MA} + \mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ implies $\mathsf {AC}(\mathbb {R})$ (the axiom of choice for non-empty sets of reals), which in turn implies $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$. Furthermore, $\mathsf {MA}$ and $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ are mutually independent in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

5. (5) For any infinite linearly orderable set X, each of “every filter base on X can be well ordered” and “every filter on X has a well-orderable base” is equivalent to “$\wp (X)$ can be well ordered”. This yields novel characterizations of the principle “every linearly ordered set can be well ordered” in $\mathsf {ZFA}$ (i.e., Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with atoms), and of $\mathsf {AC}$ in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

6. (6) “Every filter on $\mathbb {R}$ has a well-orderable base” implies “every filter on $\omega $ has a well-orderable base”, which in turn implies $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$, and none of these implications are reversible in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

7. (7) “Every filter on $\omega $ can be extended to an ultrafilter with a well-orderable base” is equivalent to $\mathsf {AC}(\mathbb {R}),$ and thus is strictly stronger than $\mathsf {UF_{wob}}(\omega )$ in $\mathsf {ZF}$.

8. (8) “Every filter on $\omega $ can be extended to an ultrafilter” implies “there exists a free ultrafilter on $\omega $ which has no well-orderable base of cardinality ${<2^{\aleph _{0}}}$”. The former principle does not imply “there exists a free ultrafilter on $\omega $ which has no well-orderable base” in $\mathsf {ZF}$, and the latter principle is true in the Basic Cohen Model.

In this article, we propose a new classification of $\Sigma ^0_2$ formulas under the realizability interpretation of many-one reducibility (i.e., Levin reducibility). For example, $\mathsf {Fin}$, the decision of being eventually zero for sequences, is many-one/Levin complete among $\Sigma ^0_2$ formulas of the form $\exists n\forall m\geq n.\varphi (m,x)$, where $\varphi $ is decidable. The decision of boundedness for sequences $\mathsf {BddSeq}$ and for width of posets $\mathsf {FinWidth}$ are many-one/Levin complete among $\Sigma ^0_2$ formulas of the form $\exists n\forall m\geq n\forall k.\varphi (m,k,x)$, where $\varphi $ is decidable. However, unlike the classical many-one reducibility, none of the above is $\Sigma ^0_2$-complete. The decision of non-density of linear orders $\mathsf {NonDense}$ is truly $\Sigma ^0_2$-complete.

Lyubetsky and Kanovei showed in [8] that there is a second-order arithmetic model of $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}$, (comprehension for all second-order formulas without parameters), in which $\Sigma ^1_2$-$\mathrm {CA}$ (comprehension for all $\Sigma ^1_2$-formulas with parameters) holds, but $\Sigma ^1_4$-$\mathrm {CA}$ fails. They asked whether there is a model of $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}+\Sigma ^1_2$-$\mathrm {CA}$ with the optimal failure of $\Sigma ^1_3$-$\mathrm {CA}$. We answer the question positively by constructing such a model in a forcing extension by a tree iteration of Jensen’s forcing. Let $\mathrm {Coll}^{-p}$ be the parameter-free collection scheme for second-order formulas and let $\mathrm {AC}^{-p}$ be the parameter-free choice scheme. We show that there is a model of $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}+\mathrm { AC}^{-p}+\Sigma ^1_2$-$\mathrm {CA}$ with a failure of $\Sigma ^1_4$-$\mathrm {CA}$. We also show that there is a model of $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}+\mathrm {Coll}^{-p}+\Sigma ^1_2$-$\mathrm {CA}$ with a failure of $\Sigma ^1_4$-$\mathrm {CA}$ and a failure of $\mathrm {AC}^{-p}$, so that, in particular, the schemes $\mathrm {Coll}^{-p}$ and $\mathrm {AC}^{-p}$ are not equivalent over $\mathrm {Z}_2^{-p}$.

We show that the evasion number $\mathfrak {e}$ can be added to Cichoń’s maximum with a distinct value. More specifically, it is consistent that $\aleph _1<\operatorname {\mathrm {add}}(\mathcal {N})<\operatorname {\mathrm {cov}}(\mathcal {N})<\mathfrak {b}<\mathfrak {e}<\operatorname {\mathrm {non}}(\mathcal {M})<\operatorname {\mathrm {cov}}(\mathcal {M})<\mathfrak {d}<\operatorname {\mathrm {non}}(\mathcal {N})<\operatorname {\mathrm {cof}}(\mathcal {N})<2^{\aleph _0}$ holds.