Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T15:44:03.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to the commentaries: A radical revision of experimental social psychology is still needed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Joseph Cesario*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. cesario@msu.edu www.cesariolab.com

Abstract

Are the landscapes of real-world decisions adequately represented in our laboratory tasks? Are the goals and expertise of experimental participants the same as real-world decision-makers? Are we neglecting crucial forces that lead to group outcomes? Are the contingencies necessary for producing experimental demonstrations of bias present in the real world? In the target article, I argued that the answers to these questions are needed to understand whether and how laboratory research can inform real-world group disparities. Most of the commentaries defending experimental social psychology neglected to directly address these main arguments. The commentaries defending implicit bias only revealed the inadequacy of this concept for explaining group disparities. The major conclusions from the target article remain intact, suggesting that experimental social psychology must undergo major changes to contribute to our understanding of group disparities.

Information

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable