Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T13:45:57.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

External validity of social psychological experiments is a concern, but these models are useful

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Youri L. Mora Open the ORCID record for Youri L. Mora [Opens in a new window] ,
Olivier Klein Open the ORCID record for Olivier Klein [Opens in a new window] ,
Christophe Leys Open the ORCID record for Christophe Leys [Opens in a new window]  and
Annique Smeding Open the ORCID record for Annique Smeding [Opens in a new window]
Youri L. Mora
Affiliation:
Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, CP 122, 50-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium. Youri.mora@ulb.be Olivier.klein@ulb.be Christophe.leys@ulb.be https://cescup.ulb.be/member/youri-mora/ https://cescup.ulb.be/member/olivier-klein/ https://cescup.ulb.be/member/christophe-leys/
Olivier Klein
Affiliation:
Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, CP 122, 50-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium. Youri.mora@ulb.be Olivier.klein@ulb.be Christophe.leys@ulb.be https://cescup.ulb.be/member/youri-mora/ https://cescup.ulb.be/member/olivier-klein/ https://cescup.ulb.be/member/christophe-leys/
Christophe Leys
Affiliation:
Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, CP 122, 50-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium. Youri.mora@ulb.be Olivier.klein@ulb.be Christophe.leys@ulb.be https://cescup.ulb.be/member/youri-mora/ https://cescup.ulb.be/member/olivier-klein/ https://cescup.ulb.be/member/christophe-leys/
Annique Smeding
Affiliation:
Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, LIP/PC2S, 73011 Chambéry cedex, France. Annique.Smeding@univ-smb.fr http://smeding.free.fr/index.php/Main/HomePage
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We agree that external validity of social psychological experiments is a concern, we disagree these models are useless. Experiments, reconsidered from a situated cognition perspective and non-linearly combined with other methods (qualitative and simulations) allow grasping decision dynamics beyond bias outcomes. Dynamic (vs. discrete) insights regarding these processes are key to understand missing forces and bias in real-world social groups.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e84
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Box, G. E. P. (1979). Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. Robustness in Statistics, 201–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-438150-6.50018-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. B. (2014). Abrupt category shifts during real-time person perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21:85–92. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0470-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, J., Pauker, K., & Sanchez, D. (2016). A perceptual pathway to bias. Psychological Science 27(4):502–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615627418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krpan, D. (2017). Behavioral priming 2.0: Enter a dynamical systems perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 8:1204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutzner, F., & Fiedler, K. (2017). Stereotypes as pseudocontingencies. European Review of Social Psychology 28(1):1–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1260238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivollier, G., Quinton, J.-C., Gonthier, C., & Smeding, A. (2020). Looking with the (computer) mouse: How to unveil problem-solving strategies in matrix reasoning without eye-tracking. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01484-3.Google ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women's performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles 66(3-4):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smaldino, P. E. (2017). Models are stupid, and we need more of them. In Vallacher, R. R., Read, S. J., & Nowak, A. (Eds.), Computational social psychology (1st ed., pp. 311–331). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173726-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeding, A., Quinton, J.-C., Lauer, K., Barca, L., & Pezzulo, G. (2016). Tracking and simulating dynamics of implicit stereotypes: A situated social cognition perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 111(6):817–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2007). Situated social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(3):132–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00490.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar