Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pztms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T02:57:47.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental studies of bias: Imperfect but neither useless nor unique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Callie H. Burt
Affiliation:
Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University; Center for Research on Interpersonal Violence, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA cburt@gsu.edu, www.callieburt.org
Brian B. Boutwell
Affiliation:
Department of Criminal Justice and Legal Studies, University of Mississippi, School of Applied Sciences; Criminal Justice and Legal Studies, University of Mississippi Medical Center, University, MS 38677-1848, USA. bbboutwe@olemiss.edu, https://legalstudies.olemiss.edu/people/brian-boutwell/

Abstract

Cesario provides a compelling critique of the use of experimental social psychology to explain real-world group disparities. We concur with his targeted critique and extend “the problem of missing information” to another common measures of bias. We disagree with Cesario's broader argument that the entire enterprise be abandoned, suggesting instead targeted utilization. Finally, we question whether the critique is appropriately directed at experimental social psychologists.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable