No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
How should we understand “bias” as a thick concept in recruitment discrimination studies?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 May 2022
Abstract
Cesario criticizes the experimental design of studies of bias by claiming that acting on stereotypes in the experimental situation might not be an “error” from a Bayesian perspective. However, social psychologists might have an ethical reason to label the observed decision-maker biases as “erroneous.” Decision-making can be considered as “biased” and “erroneous,” because it reflects illegal and morally condemnable discrimination.
Information
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Altman, A. (2020). Discrimination. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: Vol. Winter 2020 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/discrimination/.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2004). Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce. Hypatia, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In Ashenfelter, O. & Rees, A. (Eds.), Discrimination in labor markets (pp. 3–33). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 694–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heymann, J., Bose, B., Waisath, W., Raub, A., & McCormack, M. (2020). Legislative approaches to nondiscrimination at work: A comparative analysis across 13 groups in 193 countries. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 40(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-10-2019-0259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivunen, T., Ylöstalo, H., & Otonkorpi-Lehtoranta, K. (2015). Informal practices of inequality in recruitment in Finland. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5(3), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.Google Scholar
Target article
What can experimental studies of bias tell us about real-world group disparities?
Related commentaries (29)
A skeptical reflection: Contextualizing police shooting decisions with skin-tone
Accuracy in social judgment does not exclude the potential for bias
Beyond stereotypes: Prejudice as an important missing force explaining group disparities
Centering the relationship between structural racism and individual bias
Cesario's framework for understanding group disparities is radically incomplete
Controlled lab experiments are one of many useful scientific methods to investigate bias
Culturally fluent real-world disparities can blind us to bias: Experiments using a cultural lens can help
Developmental research assessing bias would benefit from naturalistic observation data
Experimental studies of bias: Imperfect but neither useless nor unique
Experiments make a good breakfast, but a poor supper
External validity of social psychological experiments is a concern, but these models are useful
Fighting over who dictates the nature of prejudice
How should we understand “bias” as a thick concept in recruitment discrimination studies?
Missing context from experimental studies amplifies, rather than negates, racial bias in the real world
Missing perspective: Marginalized groups in the social psychological study of social disparities
Practical consequences of flawed social psychological research on bias
Social bias insights concern judgments rather than real-world decisions
Surely not all experimental studies of bias need abandoning?
Taking social psychology out of context
The call for ecological validity is right but missing perceptual idiosyncrasies is wrong
The importance of ecological validity, ultimate causation, and natural categories
The internal validity obsession
The logic of challenging research into bias and social disparity
The missing consequences: A fourth flaw of experiments
The only thing that can stop bad causal inference is good causal inference
The unbearable limitations of solo science: Team science as a path for more rigorous and relevant research
Two thousand years after Archimedes, psychologist finds three topics that will simply not yield to the experimental method
Understanding causal mechanisms in the study of group bias
What can the implicit social cognition literature teach us about implicit social cognition?
Author response
Reply to the commentaries: A radical revision of experimental social psychology is still needed