Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-24T03:01:39.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A skeptical reflection: Contextualizing police shooting decisions with skin-tone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

David M. Blake Open the ORCID record for David M. Blake [Opens in a new window]
David M. Blake*
Affiliation:
Blake Consulting & Training Group, Brentwood, CA 94513, USA. Dave@Blake-Consulting.com; https://blake-consulting.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary expands the discussion of Cesario's Missing Forces Flaw by identifying and discussing variables that influence police shooting decisions but are often absent from bias-based research. Additionally, the closing identifies novel recommendations for future contextually related research.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e70
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aveni, T. (2008). A critical analysis of police shootings under ambiguous circumstances. The MMRMA Deadly Force Project. Retrieved from: http://www.theppsc.org/Research/V3.MMRMA_Deadly_Force_Project.pdf.Google Scholar
Correll, J., Hudson, S. M., Guillermo, S., & Ma, D. S. (2014). The police officer's dilemma: A decade of research on racial bias in the decision to shoot. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(5), 201–213. doi:10.1111/spc3.12099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., & Isaza, G. T. (2020). Moving beyond “Best practice”: Experiences in police reform and a call for evidence to reduce officer-involved shootings. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219889328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fachner, G., & Carter, S. (2015). An assessment of deadly force in the Philadelphia police department. Collaborative reform initiative. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
FitzGerald, C., Martin, A., Berner, D., & Hurst, S. (2019). Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real-world contexts: A systematic review. BMC Psychology, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi:10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 522–559. doi:10.1037/pspa0000160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fridell, L. A. (2016). Explaining the disparity in results across studies assessing racial disparity in police use of force: A research note. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(3), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-016-9378-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989).Google Scholar
Hine, K. A., Porter, L. E., Westera, N. J., Alpert, G. P., & Allen, A. (2019). What were they thinking? Factors influencing police recruits’ decisions about force. Policing and Society, 29(6), 673–691. https://doi:10.21428/1163c5ca.8dfe6a91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, M. E., & Jennings, W. G. (2018). Racial disparities in police use-of-force: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: An International Journal, 41(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-09-2017-0112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L., James, S. M., & Vila, B. J. (2016). The reverse racism effect. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(2), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L., James, S., & Vila, B. (2018). Testing the impact of citizen characteristics and demeanor on police officer behavior in potentially violent encounters. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 41(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-11-2016-0159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, D. A. (2012). Back to basics: Some thoughts on the importance of organized skepticism in criminology and public policy. Criminology and Public Policy. 11(4), 637–640. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00843.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, D. A., & Slocum, L. A. (2017). Critical assessment of an analysis of a journalistic compendium of citizens killed by police gunfire. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 349–362. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, P., & Amin, A. (2021). Investigating fatal police shootings using the human factors analysis and classification framework (HFACS). Police Practice and Research, 22(7), 1777–1791. doi: 10.1080/15614263.2021.1878893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuys, A., Savelsbergh, G. J., & Oudejans, R. R. (2012). Shoot or don't shoot? Why police officers are more inclined to shoot when they are anxious. Emotion, 12(4), 827–833. doi:10.1037/a0025699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieuwenhuys, A., Savelsbergh, G. J., & Oudejans, R. R. (2015). Persistence of threat-induced errors in police officers' shooting decisions. Applied Ergonomics, 48, 263–272. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nix, J., Campbell, B. A., Byers, E. H., & Alpert, G. P. (2017). A bird's eye view of civilians killed by police in 2015. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 309–340. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotello, C. M., Kelly, L. J., & Heit, E. (2018). The shape of ROC curves in shooter tasks: Implications for best practices in analysis. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 32. https://doi:10.1525/collabra.171Google Scholar
Shane, J., & Swenson, Z. (2020). Unarmed and dangerous: Patterns of threats by citizens during deadly force encounters with police (1st ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, M., Engel, R.S., & Cherkauskas, J.C. (2019). A multi-method investigation of officer decision-making and force used or avoided in arrest situations: Tulsa, Oklahoma police department administrative data analysis report. Retrieved from https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/Research%20Center/FINAL%20Tulsa%20Data%20Analysis%20Report-Use%20of%20Force%20Decision-making%20(1).pdf.Google Scholar
Suss, J., & Ward, P. (2018). Revealing perceptual-cognitive expertise in law enforcement: An iterative approach using verbal-report, temporal-occlusion, and option-generation methods. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0493-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, A. P., Phillips, S. W., Worrall, J. L., & Bishopp, S. A. (2018). What factors influence an officer's decision to shoot? The promise and limitations of using public data. Justice Research and Policy, 18(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525107118759900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, J. L., Bishopp, S. A., & Terrill, W. (2020). The effect of suspect race on police officers' decisions to draw their weapons. Justice Quarterly. https://doi:10.1080/07418825.2020.1760331.Google Scholar