Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T10:31:06.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making life and mind as clear as possible, but not clearer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

Alex Gomez-Marin Open the ORCID record for Alex Gomez-Marin [Opens in a new window]
Alex Gomez-Marin*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Neurociencias (CSIC-UMH), 03550 San Juan Alicante, Spain agomezmarin@gmail.com https://behavior-of-organisms.org/@behaviOrganisms
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neuroscience needs theory. Ideas without data are blind, and yet mechanisms without concepts are empty. Friston's free energy principle paradigmatically illustrates the power and pitfalls of current theoretical biology. Mighty metaphors, turned into mathematical models, can become mindless metaphysics. Then, seeking to understand everything in principle, we may explain nothing in practice. Life can't live in a map.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e196
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andrews, M. (2021). The math is not the territory: Navigating the free energy principle. Biology & Philosophy, 36, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, H. (1896). Matière et mémoire: Essai sur la relation du corps à l'esprit.Google Scholar
Bernard, C. (1878). Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communes aux animaux et aux végétaux. Baillière.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitbol, M., & Gallagher, S. (2018). The free energy principle and autopoiesis. Physics of Life Reviews, 24, 24–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canguilhem, G. (1952). La connaissance de la vie. Vrin.Google Scholar
Ciaunica, A., Constant, A., Preissl, H, & Fotopoulou, K. (2021). The first prior: From co-embodiment to co-homeostasis in early life. Consciousness and Cognition, 91, 103117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of Species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K. J. (2010). The free energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomez-Marin, A. (2019). A clash of Umwelts: Anthropomorphism in behavioral neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, E229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGilchrist, I. (2021). The matter with things: Our brains, our delusions, and the unmaking of the world. Perspectiva.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. (2010). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
von Helmholtz, H. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen optik. Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1926). The education of an Englishman. The Atlantic Monthly, 138, 192–198.Google Scholar
Woit, P. (2006). Not even wrong: The failure of string theory and the continuing challenge to unify the laws of physics. Basic Books.Google Scholar